Iatrogenic vascular complications of non-vascular percutaneous abdominal procedures.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to compile and present all of the reported vascular complications that resulted from common non-vascular abdominal procedures in the literature. Non-vascular procedures include, though are not limited to, percutaneous abscess/fluid collection drainage (PAD), percutaneous nephrostomy (PN), paracentesis, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC)/percutaneous biliary drainage (PBD), percutaneous biliary stone removal, and percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy (PG)/percutaneous radiologic gastrojejunostomy (PG-J). By gathering this information, radiologists performing these procedures can be aware of the associated vascular injuries, as well as take steps to minimize risks. METHODS: A literature review was conducted using the PubMed database to catalog relevant articles, published in the year 2000 onward, in which an iatrogenic vascular complication occurred from the following non-vascular abdominal procedures: PAD, PN, paracentesis, PTC/PBD, percutaneous biliary stone removal, and PG/PG-J. Biopsy and tumor ablation were deferred from this article. RESULTS: 214 studies met criteria for analysis. 28 patients died as a result of vascular complications from the analyzed non-vascular abdominal procedures. Vascular complications from paracentesis were responsible for 19 patient deaths, followed by four deaths from PTC/PBD, three from biliary stone removal, and two from PG. CONCLUSION: Despite non-vascular percutaneous abdominal procedures being minimally invasive, vascular complications still can arise and be quite serious, even resulting in death. Through the presentation of vascular complications associated with these procedures, interventionalists can improve patient care by understanding the steps that can be taken to minimize these risks and to reduce complication rates.

Part 2: Current Concepts in Radiologic Imaging & Intervention in Acute Biliary Tract Diseases.

Acute cholangitis is encountered commonly in critically ill, often elderly, patients. The most common causes of cholangitis include choledocholithiasis, biliary strictures, and infection from previous endoscopic, percutaneous, or surgical intervention of the biliary tract. Rare causes of acute cholangitis in the United States include sclerosing cholangitis and recurrent pyogenic cholangitis, the latter predominantly occurring in immigrants of Asian descent. Multidisciplinary management of these conditions is essential, with intensivists, surgeons, diagnostic radiologists, interventional radiologists, gastroenterologists, endoscopists, and infectious disease physicians typically involved in the care of these patients. In this paper intended for intensivists predominantly, we will review the imaging findings and radiologic interventional management of critically ill patients with acute cholangitis, primary and secondary sclerosing cholangitis, and recurrent pyogenic cholangitis.

Part 1: Current Concepts in Radiologic Imaging and Intervention in Acute Cholecystitis.

Acute calculous cholecystitis and acute acalculous cholecystitis are encountered commonly among critically ill, often elderly, patients. Multidisciplinary management of these conditions is essential, with intensivists, surgeons, diagnostic radiologists, interventional radiologists, infectious disease physicians, gastroenterologists, and endoscopists able to contribute to patient care. In this article intended predominantly for intensivists, we will review the imaging findings and radiologic treatment of critically ill patients with acute calculous cholecystitis and acute acalculous cholecystitis.

Ideas and Opportunities for Radiologists--Career and Professional Advising and Medical Education.

This article is about two highly diverse radiologists, who fortuitously came together by working as Career and Professional Advisors in the Student Affairs Department of a U.S. medical school. This job opportunity offered each radiologist, albeit for markedly different reasons, a means to transition from full-time Radiology to the opportune world of medical school education. The focus of this paper will be on Career and Professional Advising, while also highlighting the many opportunities for radiologists in current medical school education.

Transitioning from interventional radiology: ideas for the inevitable.

BACKGROUND: Interventional Radiology (IR) is a highly rewarding specialty, both for its salutary effects for patients, as will as the satisfaction it provides for the operating radiologists. Nonetheless, arduous work and long hours have led to numerous reports of burnout amongst interventional radiologists (IRs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six long-term academic radiologists in leadership positions briefly chronicle their becoming IRs, their type of transitioning from IR, and the pros and cons of those respective transitions. RESULTS: The specific transitions include reduced time in IR, switching to diagnostic radiology, becoming involved in medical school education, ceasing IR leadership, and retirement. Pros and cons of the various transition strategies are highlighted. CONCLUSION: As the taxing work and long hours are so ubiquitous for IRs, and as burnout is so common, transitioning from IR is highly likely eventually for IRs. The varied transition experiences highlighted in this report hopefully will be helpful for current and aspiring IRs.

Academic radiology department subspeciality organization & fellowship offerings: A hodgepodge.

INTRODUCTION: As opportunities for radiologists to subspecialize have increased, many avenues to organize Radiology department subspecialties exist. This study seeks to determine how academic U.S. Radiology departments structure themselves with respect to subspecialty divisions/sections, as there are no current standards for how Radiology departments are subdivided. Additionally, the extent of Radiology fellowships offered are assessed. The websites of academic U.S. Radiology departments, a highly influential source of information, were analyzed to perform this study. MATERIALS & METHODS: Radiology department websites of all allopathic U.S. medical schools (n = 148) were assessed for the following: presence/absence of Radiology department subdivisions, division/section labels, number of divisions/sections, division/section titles, presence/absence of Radiology fellowships, number of fellowships, and fellowships titles. RESULTS: 114/148 (77 %) medical schools had Radiology department websites. According to their respective websites, 66/114 (58 %) academic Radiology departments had subspecialty divisions/sections, whereas 48/114 (42 %) had no divisions/sections listed. Of the departments that had divisions/sections, the median number of divisions/sections per department was nine, and ranged from two to 14. Fellowships were offered at 82/114 (72 %) academic Radiology departments that had websites, and the median number was six, ranging from one to 13. CONCLUSION: There is marked heterogeneity of departmental organization across Radiology departments nationwide, likely due to the lack of current standards for how Radiology departments are subdivided into divisions/sections. Of the 77 % of medical schools that have Radiology department websites, only 58 % of departments listed divisions/sections, and 72 % posted fellowship offerings.

Updated Review of Radiologic Imaging and Intervention for Acute Pancreatitis and Its Complications.

This is a current update on radiologic imaging and intervention of acute pancreatitis and its complications. In this review, we define the various complications of acute pancreatitis, discuss the imaging findings, as well as the timing of when these complications occur. The various classification and scoring systems of acute pancreatitis are summarized. Advantages and disadvantages of the 3 primary radiologic imaging modalities are compared. We then discuss radiologic interventions for acute pancreatitis. These include diagnostic aspiration as well as percutaneous catheter drainage of fluid collections, abscesses, pseudocysts, and necrosis. Recommendations for when these interventions should be considered, as well as situations in which they are contraindicated are discussed. Fortunately, acute pancreatitis usually is mild; however, serious complications occur in 20%, and admission of patients to the intensive care unit (ICU) occurs in over 10%. In this paper, we will focus on the imaging and interventional radiologic aspects for the serious complications and patients admitted to the ICU.

Why Medical Students Pursue Radiology: A Current Longitudinal Survey on Motivations and Controversial Issues in Radiology.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Radiology is an increasingly competitive specialty. Various current factors influence medical students' decision to pursue a radiology career, including artificial intelligence (AI), remote reading, and COVID-19. This study seeks to determine the decision-making factors of all alumni from our medical school who matched into a radiology residency, and to gather opinions on emerging radiology topics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey querying decision-making factors and opinions on current radiology topics was distributed to all alumni from our medical school (first graduating class in 2011) who previously matched into a diagnostic or interventional radiology residency program (n = 57). Wilcoxon Rank-Sum and Fisher's Exact tests were used to determine statistical significance. RESULTS: Forty-three of fifty-seven responses were received (75% response rate). The most influential factor that sparked respondents' interest in radiology was a radiology elective (25/43, 58%). Students who will finish radiology training in 2023 or later were more likely to be influenced by a mentor (15/23, 65%) than those who finished radiology training before 2023 (5/20, 25%) (p = 0.04). Respondents reported a 1.6/5 concern about AI negatively impacting their future career in radiology. There was 1.7/5 concern about performing radiology procedures on patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Respondents predicted that remote reading would have a 3.2/5 positive impact on helping them achieve their preferred lifestyle. Job satisfaction among attending radiologists is rated at 4.3/5. CONCLUSION: Radiology electives had the greatest influence in piquing students' interest in radiology, while mentorship is assuming increasing influence. AI is perceived as a relatively minimal threat to negatively impact radiologists' jobs. Respondents had little concern about performing radiology procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Remote reading is viewed as having a moderately positive impact on lifestyle. Responding radiologists enjoy notably high job satisfaction.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in pediatric endocrinology.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is integrating itself throughout the medical community. AI's ability to analyze complex patterns and interpret large amounts of data will have considerable impact on all areas of medicine, including pediatric endocrinology. In this paper, we review and update the current studies of AI in pediatric endocrinology. Specific topics that are addressed include: diabetes management, bone growth, metabolism, obesity, and puberty. Becoming knowledgeable and comfortable with AI will assist pediatric endocrinologists, the goal of the paper.

The Cases for and against Artificial Intelligence in the Medical School Curriculum.

Although artificial intelligence (AI) has immense potential to shape the future of medicine, its place in undergraduate medical education currently is unclear. Numerous arguments exist both for and against including AI in the medical school curriculum. AI likely will affect all medical specialties, perhaps radiology more so than any other. The purpose of this article is to present a balanced perspective on whether AI should be included officially in the medical school curriculum. After presenting the balanced point-counterpoint arguments, the authors provide a compromise. Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Medical Education, Medical School Curriculum, Medical Students, Radiology, Use of AI in Education © RSNA, 2022.

The clinical day at CARS: philosophy, strategy, and the future.

PURPOSE: For over three decades, the Computer-Assisted Radiology and Surgery (CARS) International Congress and Exhibition has provided a forum for the presentation of innovations in computer applications in radiology, medicine, and surgery. A unique feature of the CARS meetings is the interplay between scientists, engineers, and physicians. Since 2007, a Clinical Day program was introduced to the Congress highlighting the practical applications of new technology within the context of clinical medical and surgical practice. METHODS: The Clinical Day of the CARS Congress allows cross-fertilization of ideas between technologically oriented engineers and clinically oriented physicians; two groups who typically have little interaction. Activities of the Clinical Day include presentations by invited speakers, presentations of Innovative Clinical Investigations, a Panel Discussion and Open Forum, and, most recently, real-time clinical presentations with professionally prepared scholarly videos. Special consideration is given to young researchers and students. There has been an explosion of interest in the Clinical Day with continued and growing interest in Artificial Intelligence, Computer-Assisted Surgery, and new scientific breakthroughs as they become linked to clinical applications. RESULTS: Success of the Clinical Day is emphasized by increased participation and efforts to expand the scope and depth of Clinical Day activities. The Open Forum has proven to be highly effective in identifying important new technologic challenges in medicine and promoting discussion among those whose expertise likely can lead to solutions. CONCLUSIONS: The original goal of the Clinical Day, to provide an effective means to "bridge the gap" between the engineering community and practicing physicians and surgeons, has been realized through the presentation and discussion of real-life, clinical material that utilizes advanced technology. The program has served to inspire young researchers by allowing them to see the end results of their laboratory investigations, thereby gaining a greater appreciation of the importance of their work.

The Role of Obesity in Motor Vehicle Injuries and Fatalities in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: A systematic review done to evaluate obesity as a risk factor for injuries and mortality in motor vehicle accidents (MVAs) in the pediatric population, as there has not been a systematic review done in over 10 years. This study aims to update the literature regarding obesity as a risk factor for injuries in MVAs in the pediatric population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines with strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, resulting in the use of 3 total articles to analyze obesity as a risk factor for overall injury and mortality in the pediatric population. RESULTS: Zaveri et al demonstrated a statistically significant, but weak, decrease in the odds of extremity injury in overweight patients ages 2 to 17 years old (odds ratio [OR] = 0.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.4-1.0, P ≤ 0.05). On the other hand, Pollack et al and Haricharan et al found an increase in extremity injury in the obese population, in ages 9 to 15 years (OR = 2.54, 95% CI = 1.15-5.59, P ≤ 0.05), and 10 to 17 years (Age 10-13: OR = 6.06, 95% CI = 2.23-16.44, P ≤ 0.05, Age 14-17 OR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.04-2.00, P ≤ 0.05), respectively. Haricharan et al also found an increase in thoracic injuries in obese children, ages 2 to 13 and increased risk of head/face/neck injury in obese children ages 2 to 5 (OR = 3.67, 95% CI = 1.03-13.08, P ≤ 0.05), but a decreased risk of head injury in obese children ages 14 to 17 (OR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.18-0.60, P ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There are sparse data that are conflicting, regarding the effect of obesity on extremity injuries in the pediatric population. Obesity is not protective against thoracic, head, or abdominal injuries. However, it was found to be a risk factor for trunk injuries in ages 2 to 13, as well as head/face/neck injuries for ages 2 to 5. Since the literature is so sparse, further research is warranted in these areas.

Current Trends in the Use of Ultrasound Over Chest X-Ray to Identify Pneumothoraces in ICU, Trauma, and ARDS Patients.

Pneumothoraces are a common and potentially fatal complication for critically ill patients in the trauma and intensive care units. Since its use for pneumothorax detection was first reported in 1987, ultrasound has been increasingly used for the detection of thoracic injuries. As ultrasound imaging has improved and operators have potentially become more proficient, it is important to analyze more recent trends in the sensitivities and specificities of ultrasound for the detection of pneumothorax. This literature review and meta-analysis identifies 17 studies that directly compare the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound and anterior-posterior chest x-ray in the identification of pneumothorax among 2955 patients who developed 793 pneumothoraces as detected by gold standard CT scanning. For the 17 articles analyzed, the pooled sensitivity of trans-thoracic ultrasound was 75.07% (64.92%-85.22%), and the pooled specificity was 98.36% (97.45%-99.26%). The pooled sensitivity of CXR was 45.65% (36.04%-55.26%), and pooled specificity was 99.62% (99.00%-100%). While this review demonstrates an improved sensitivity in the detection of pneumothorax with ultrasound over AP chest x-rays, it did not find a significant trend or improvement in the sensitivity or specificity of ultrasound for detecting pneumothorax over time.

Assessing the Cushion Effect: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Role of Obesity in Motor Vehicle Injuries and Fatalities.

PURPOSE: A systematic review and meta-analysis were done to evaluate the effect of obesity in injury and mortality due to motor vehicle accidents. MATERIALS & METHODS: The systematic review consisted of 20 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis was conducted on these studies to analyze obesity as a risk factor for specific injuries, as well as overall injury and mortality compared to non-obese patients. RESULTS: The data revealed that obesity was associated with increased lower extremity injuries (odds ratio [OR] = 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.19-1.69, P ≤ 0.05), neck injuries (OR = 3.38, 95% CI = 1.58-5.19, P ≤ 0.05), and overall mortality (OR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.40-1.61, P ≤ 0.05). When stratified for obesity class with class I as BMI >30.1-34.9, class II BMI 35-39.9, and class III BMI >40, only class II (OR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.15-1.24, P ≤ 0.05) and class III (OR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.30-1.68, P ≤ 0.05) were associated with increased mortality risk. No significant differences were seen with head, upper extremity, thoracic, abdominal, or pelvic injuries. CONCLUSION: Obesity is a risk factor in motor vehicle accidents for fatality and injury, specifically lower extremity and neck injuries.

Finger Flexor Pulley Injuries in Rock Climbers.

Finger flexor pulley system injuries are the most common overuse injury in rock climbers. These injuries occur rarely outside of rock climbing, owing to the sport's unique biomechanical demands on the finger. As rock climbing continues to grow and earn recognition as a mainstream sport, an understanding of how to diagnose and treat these injuries also has become important. Our purpose is to describe current concepts in anatomy, biomechanics, clinical evaluation, imaging, prevention, and treatment strategies relating to finger flexor pulley system injuries. Our literature search was performed on PubMed with MeSH terms and keywords as subject headings to meet the objectives of this review. The "crimp grip" used in rock climbing is the mechanism for these injuries. The A2, A3, and A4 pulleys are at the highest risk of injury, especially when loaded eccentrically. Physical examination may reveal clinical "bowstringing," defined as the volar displacement of the flexor tendons from the phalanges; however, imaging is required for characterization of the underlying injury. Ultrasound is highly sensitive and specific for diagnosis and is recommended as the initial imaging technique of choice. Magnetic resonance imaging is recommended as an additional imaging study if ultrasound is inconclusive. Properly warming up increases the amount of physiologic bowstringing and is thought to prevent injury from occurring. Pulley injuries may be classified as grade I through IV. Conservative treatment, including immobilization, the H-tape method, and the use of a protective pulley splint, is recommended for grade I to III injuries. Surgical repair is reserved for grade IV injuries that are not amenable to conservative treatment.

AI in the Intensive Care Unit: Up-to-Date Review.

AI is the latest technologic trend that likely will have a huge impact in medicine. AI's potential lies in its ability to process large volumes of data and perform complex pattern analyses. The ICU is an area of medicine that is particularly conducive to AI applications. Much AI ICU research currently is focused on improving high volumes of data on high-risk patients and making clinical workflow more efficient. Emerging topics of AI medicine in the ICU include AI sensors, sepsis prediction, AI in the NICU or SICU, and the legal role of AI in medicine. This review will cover the current applications of AI medicine in the ICU, potential pitfalls, and other AI medicine-related topics relevant for the ICU.

Artificial Intelligence: Has Its Time Come for Inclusion in Medical School Education? Maybe Maybe Not.

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to strongly modify or even transform the landscape of medicine. Judicious utilization of AI can further propel progress in medical research, facilitate precision medicine, and optimize clinical workflow-the applications are limitless. Although technology and AI algorithms are evolving rapidly and have important implications for future physicians, there is a dearth of literature available for medical students and their educators to learn about AI. While scientific journals provide information regarding AI, they often are written for and by scientists, engineers, and physicians who are well-versed in technology. Currently, medical students must navigate the technical jargon and decipher AI literature without any foundational exposure. It is difficult for students to understand the implications of AI if they do not have basic knowledge of AI and its current capabilities. A fear about AI is pervasive amongst medical students. There is virtually no literature that provides a fundamental and easily digestible overview of AI for medical students and educators, while also offering suggestions about how to integrate AI into medical school curricula. Our goal is to address the lack of formal AI instruction by presenting an informative primer with curricular suggestions for each medical school year, from a U.S. perspective, tailored to medical students and their educators. We seek to present a balanced approach, as there are pros and cons about incorporating AI in undergraduate medical education.