A Randomized Case-Series Study Comparing the Stability of Implant with Two Different Surfaces Placed in Fresh Extraction Sockets and Immediately Loaded.

Background. Hydrophilic and moderately rough implant surfaces have been proposed to enhance the osseointegration response. Aim. The aim of this study was to compare early changes of stability for two implants with identical macrodesign but with different surface topographies. Materials and Methods. In 11 patients, a total of 22 implants (11 bimodal (minimally rough, control) and 11 proactive (moderately rough and hydrophilic, test), Neoss Ltd., Harrogate, UK) were immediately placed into fresh extraction sockets and immediately loaded. The peak insertion torque (IT) was measured in Ncm at placement. Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) measurements were made at baseline and 2, 4, 6, and 12 weeks after surgery. Results. The two implant types showed similar IT and RFA values at placement (NS). A dip of RFA values after 2 weeks followed by an increase was observed, where the test implant showed a less pronounced decrease and a more rapid recovery than the control implant. The test implants were significantly more stable than the control ones after 12 weeks. Conclusions. The results from the present study indicated that the hydrophilic and rougher test implant was more resistant to immediate loading and showed a significantly higher stability than the smoother control implant after 12 weeks.

A One-year Follow-up Study of a Tapered Hydrophilic Implant Design Using Various Placement Protocols in the Maxilla.

PURPOSE: To study the clinical/radiographic outcomes and stability of a tapered implant design with a hydrophilic surface when placed in the maxilla using various protocols and followed for one year. METHODS: Ninety-seven consecutive patients treated as part of daily routine in two clinics with 163 tapered implants in healed sites, in extraction sockets and together with bone augmentation procedures in the maxilla were evaluated after one year in function. Individual healing periods varying from 0 to 6 months had been used. Insertion torque (IT) and resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measurements were made at baseline. Follow-up RFA registrations were made after 6 and 12 months of loading. The marginal bone levels were measured in intraoral radiographs from baseline and after 12 months. A reference group consisting of 163 consecutive straight maxillary implants was used for the comparison of baseline IT and RFA measurements. RESULTS: Five implants failed before loading, giving an implant survival rate of 96.9% and a prosthesis survival rate of 99.4% after one year. The mean marginal bone loss after one year was 0.5 mm (SD 0.4). The mean IT was statistically significantly higher for tapered than for straight reference implants (41.3 ± 12.0 Ncm vs 33.6 ± 12.5 Ncm, p < 0.001). The tapered implants showed a statistically insignificantly higher mean ISQ value than the straight references implants (73.7 ± 6.4 ISQ vs 72.2 ± 8.0 ISQ, p=0.119). There was no correlation between IT and marginal bone loss. There was a correlation between IT and RFA measurements (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The tapered implant showed a high survival rate and minimal marginal bone loss after one year in function when using various protocols for placement. The tapered implant showed significantly higher insertion torque values than straight reference implants.

Treatment of infrabony periodontal defects with esterified hyaluronic acid: clinical report of 19 consecutive lesions.

This work sought to investigate the clinical efficacy of esterified hyaluronic acid for treating deep periodontal defects. Nineteen defects, 18 infrabony and one mandibular molar furcation, were treated. Defects with probing pocket depths (PPDs) of at least 6 mm were consecutively included in the study. The PPD, gingival recession, and clinical attachment level (CAL) were evaluated at each defect before treatment and 1 year after surgery. A full-thickness flap was raised and the roots were accurately planed; hyaluronic acid in the form of fibers was then packed into the defect to completely fill the space. One year after treatment, the mean PPD was reduced by 5.8 mm (range, 0 to 10 mm), gingival recession had increased by 2.0 mm (range, 0 to 6 mm), and attachment gain was 3.8 mm (range, 0 to 7 mm).

Immediate/early function of Brånemark System TiUnite implants in fresh extraction sockets in maxillae and posterior mandibles: an 18-month prospective clinical study.

BACKGROUND: The advantages of placing implants in fresh extraction sockets and putting them in immediate/early function are many. A predicable protocol opens the possibility of performing a single surgical procedure, giving the patient a temporary prosthesis immediately, and minimizing the shrinkage of hard tissue and soft tissue recession. PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to develop a strict protocol for and to evaluate the feasibility of immediate/ early function on implants placed in fresh extraction sockets located in maxillae and posterior mandibles, including defects around the implants treated according to a regenerative procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients were treated after tooth extraction according to an immediate function protocol and were observed for 18 months. Fifty Mk IV TiUnite (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) implants were installed in partially edentulous areas in maxillae (n = 17) and posterior mandibles (n = 5). Implants were installed directly into the alveoli, and the temporary prostheses were connected immediately after surgery (n = 11) or within 7 days, that is, an "early function" procedure (n = 11). Thirteen implants did not require any type of regenerative procedure, whereas the remaining 37 implants had filling with autogenous bone, 4 of which also had a resorbable membrane. Standardized intraoral radiographs were taken for evaluation of marginal bone level, and 38 of the implants were systematically checked by resonance frequency analysis. RESULTS: All patients were followed for 18 months, and none of the 50 implants failed. However, one implant showed signs of failure after 6 weeks, but once the occlusal load was removed, the implant regained its stability completely, no longer demonstrated symptoms, and could be used successfully for prosthetic rehabilitation. The mean value of the implant stability quotient was 60 at baseline (range 45-75) and 63 after 6 months (range 46-75). The marginal bone resorption was 0.9 mm (SD 1.1 mm; n = 48) 18 months after implant insertion (1 year after final prosthesis). CONCLUSION: The immediate placement of implants into fresh extraction sockets combined with immediate/early function procedures seems to be a safe and reliable procedure when using a strict protocol.

A proposal for the classification of bony defects adjacent to dental implants.

A new classification of bone defects adjacent to dental implants is proposed. The classification highlights the importance of defect anatomy in the progression of the regenerative process. Defects were divided into two main groups: (1) closed defects, characterized by the maintenance of intact surrounding bone walls; and (2) open defects, which lack one or more bone walls. The open defect group was then divided into several subgroups that include the majority of situations encountered in clinical practice. The classification could be a useful tool for planning the correct regenerative procedure for each type of defect.

Early function of splinted implants in maxillas and posterior mandibles, using Brånemark System Tiunite implants: an 18-month prospective clinical multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Immediate or early loading of implants placed in maxillas and posterior mandibles has been a concern as bone density is often low in these areas, making it difficult to establish good initial implant stability. By adapting implant design and insertion protocols, however, high initial implant stability may be achieved in these regions. Further, a modified implant surface texture has been proved to help in maintaining stability during the initial healing period. PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to investigate the clinical performance of oxidized titanium implants (TiUnite, Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) when used for early function in the maxilla and in the posterior mandible, locations where the bone density often is low. A further aim was to evaluate the marginal bone level at oxidized implants and compare it with that of machined-surface implants used in a previous study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients were consecutively included in the study, and 37 edentulous areas in maxillas and posterior mandibles were treated. Bruxism and uncontrolled periodontal disease were exclusion criteria. Temporary prostheses were generally placed within 9 days but not after 16 days from implant placement. A previous study applying the same study design and clinical protocol but using machined-surface implants was used for comparisons. RESULTS: Of the 111 implants installed, 1 failed, giving an overall survival rate of 99.1% after 18 months. The prosthesis survival was 100%. The marginal bone resorption was 0.8 mm (standard deviation [SD], 1.0), as opposed to 1.6 mm (SD, 1.3) in the previous study with machined-surface implants, but was not statistically significantly different (p = .10). CONCLUSION: The present clinical protocol (aiming at high primary stability) and the use of oxidized titanium implants for early functional loading in the maxilla and the posterior mandible resulted in a high implant survival rate and a favorable marginal bone level during a follow-up of 18 months. The difference in marginal bone resorption between the oxidized implants in the present study and the machined implants from a previous investigation with the same study design was not statistically significant.

Early function of splinted implants in maxillas and posterior mandibles using Brånemark system machined-surface implants: an 18-month prospective clinical multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: There are limited clinical data available for immediately or early loaded implants placed in posterior mandibles and maxillas. This is probably because bone density often is low in these areas, making it difficult to establish good initial implant stability. By eliminating countersinking and using slightly tapered implants (Brånemark System , Mk IV, Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden), however, high initial implant stability might be achieved in these regions. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the possibility of early application of implant function in oral locations where the bone density is often low, namely the maxilla and posterior mandible. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients were included consecutively in the study, and 36 edentulous areas in maxillas and posterior mandibles were treated. All patients were nonsmokers in good general health. Bruxism and uncontrolled periodontal disease were exclusion criteria. One hundred twenty-four machined-surface implants were placed using an insertion torque of at least 40 Ncm. Temporary prostheses with narrow occlusal platforms, flat cusps, and light occlusal contacts were generally placed within 1 week and not exceeding 20 days from implant placement. RESULTS: Of the 124 implants installed, 4 failed, 1 in each of four patients, giving an overall survival rate of 96.8% after 18 months. Two implants failed in maxillas and two in mandibles. One implant in a maxilla and one in a mandible were lost in an early stage, and the other two were lost a few months after placement. The prostheses' survival was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that early implant function rehabilitation in maxillas and posterior mandibles is viable using the present clinical protocol. The results are comparable with those of conventional two-stage protocols.