Diagnostic Accuracy of Synovial Lactate, Polymerase Chain Reaction, or Clinical Examination for Suspected Adult Septic Arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Adult septic arthritis can be challenging to differentiate from other causes of acute joint pain. The diagnostic accuracy of synovial lactate and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to quantify the diagnostic accuracy of synovial lactate, PCR, and clinical evaluation for adults with possible septic arthritis in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: We report a prospective sampling of ED patients aged ≥ 18 years with knee symptoms concerning for septic arthritis. Clinicians and research assistants independently performed history and physical examination. Serum and synovial laboratory testing was ordered at the discretion of the clinician. We analyzed frozen synovial fluid specimens for l- and d-lactate and PCR. The criterion standard for septic arthritis was bacterial growth on synovial culture and treated by consultants with operative drainage, prolonged antibiotics, or both. Diagnostic accuracy measures included sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, interval likelihood ratios, and receiver operating characteristic area under the curve. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were included with septic arthritis prevalence of 7%. No finding on history or physical examination accurately ruled in or ruled out septic arthritis. Synovial l- and d-lactate and PCR were inaccurate for the diagnosis of septic arthritis. Synovial white blood cell count and synovial Gram stain most accurately rule in and rule out septic arthritis. CONCLUSIONS: Septic arthritis prevalence in ED adults is lower than reported previously. History and physical examination, synovial lactate, and PCR are inadequate for the diagnosis of septic arthritis. Synovial white blood cell count and Gram stain are the most accurate tests available for septic arthritis.

Blunt Thoracolumbar-Spine Trauma Evaluation in the Emergency Department: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy for History, Physical Examination, and Imaging.

BACKGROUND: Delayed diagnoses of unstable thoracolumbar spine (TL-spine) fractures can result in neurologic deficits and avoidable pain, so it is important for clinicians to reach prompt diagnostic decisions. There are no validated decision aids for determining which trauma patients warrant TL-spine imaging. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to quantify the diagnostic accuracy of the injury mechanism, physical examination, associated injuries, clinical decision aids, and imaging for evaluating blunt TL-spine trauma patients. METHODS: A search strategy for studies including adult blunt TL-spine trauma using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CENTRAL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed. Excluded studies lacked data to construct 2 × 2 tables, were duplicates, were not primary research, did not focus on blunt trauma, examined associated injuries without any utility in identifying TL-spine injuries, only studied cervical-spine fractures, were non-English, had a pediatric setting, or were cadaver/autopsy reports. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Diagnostic predictors were analyzed with a meta-analysis of sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios. RESULTS: In blunt trauma patients in the emergency department, the weighted pretest probability of a TL-spine fracture was 15%. The estimates for detection of TL-spine fractures with plain film were: positive likelihood ratio (+LR) = 25.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.1-152.2; I2 = 94%; p < 0.001) and negative likelihood ratio (-LR) = 0.43 (95% CI 0.32-0.59; I2 = 84%; p < 0.001), and for computed tomography (CT) were: +LR = 81.1 (95% CI 14.1-467.9; I2 = 87%; p < 0.001) and -LR = 0.04 (95% CI 0.02-0.08; I2 = 23%; p = 0.26). CONCLUSIONS: CT is more accurate than plain films for detecting TL-spine fractures. Injury mechanism, physical examination, and associated injuries alone are not accurate to rule-in or rule-out TL-spine fractures.

Bone marrow aspirate concentrate with cancellous allograft versus iliac crest bone graft in the treatment of long bone nonunions.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) with cancellous allograft to iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) in the treatment of long bone nonunions. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A single level I trauma center. PATIENTS: 26 patients with long bone diaphyseal or metaphyseal nonunions with defects >2 mm and treated with open repair and BMAC, compared to 25 patients with long bone diaphyseal or metaphyseal nonunions with defects >2 mm and treated with open repair and ICBG. INTERVENTION: Open repair of long bone nonunion using either autologous ICBG or BMAC with cancellous allograft. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Nonunion healing, radiographically measured by the modified Radiographic Union Score for Tibia (mRUST) score. Secondary outcomes included risk factors associated with failed repair. RESULTS: The union rates for the BMAC and ICBG cohorts were 75% and 78%, respectively (P = .8). Infection was the only risk factor of statistical significance for failure. CONCLUSION: In this study, we found no significant difference in union rate for long bone nonunions treated with ICBG or BMAC with allograft. BMAC and allograft led to 75% successful healing in this series. Given the heterogeneity of the control group and loss to follow-up, further prospective investigation should be conducted to more rigorously compare BMAC to ICBG for nonunion treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective cohort.

Meta-analysis of the Risk of Infections After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction by Graft Type.

BACKGROUND: An infection after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a relatively rare but challenging complication. There are no meta-analyses comparing the incidence of infections after ACL reconstruction with the various available graft choices. PURPOSE: To compare the incidence of infections after ACL reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts compared with hamstring autografts, with a secondary aim of comparing the incidence of infections after reconstruction with autografts compared with allografts. STUDY DESIGN: Meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to identify level 1 and 2 studies that reported the incidence of infections by graft type after ACL reconstruction. Studies that evaluated patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction with an autograft, allograft, or combination of autograft and allograft and reported the number of postoperative infections by graft type utilized were considered for inclusion. Studies were excluded if they included revision ACL reconstruction or did not specify the number of infections by graft type. Study findings were reviewed, and meta-analysis was performed when data were sufficiently homogeneous. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies meeting criteria were identified from the literature review. Meta-analysis revealed a significant difference in the incidence of deep infections between BPTB autografts and hamstring autografts, with the BPTB group displaying a 77% lower incidence of infections compared with the hamstring group (relative risk [RR], 0.23; 95% CI, 0.097-0.54). The incidence of infections was 66% lower with BPTB autografts compared with all other graft types, with a pooled RR of 0.33 (95% CI, 0.15-0.71). There was no significant difference in the incidence of infections after ACL reconstruction with autografts compared with allografts (RR, 1.035; 95% CI, 0.589-1.819). CONCLUSION: The findings of this meta-analysis demonstrate a significantly lower incidence of deep infections after ACL reconstruction with BPTB autografts compared with hamstring autografts but not compared with allografts. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although the overall infection rate after ACL reconstruction is relatively low, the significantly higher rate of infections with hamstring autografts compared with BPTB autografts should be a consideration when discussing graft choices for ACL reconstruction.

Open Tibia Shaft Fractures and Soft-Tissue Coverage: The Effects of Management by an Orthopaedic Microsurgical Team.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the timing of soft-tissue (flap) coverage and occurrence of complications before and after the establishment of an integrated orthopaedic trauma/microsurgical team. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A single level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: Twenty-eight subjects (13 pre- and 15 post-integration) with open tibia shaft fractures (OTA/AO 42A, 42B, and 42C) treated with flap coverage between January 2009 and March 2015. INTERVENTION: Flap coverage for open tibia shaft fractures treated before ("preintegration") and after ("postintegration") implementation of an integrated orthopaedic trauma/microsurgical team. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Time from index injury to flap coverage. RESULTS: The unadjusted median time to coverage was 7 days (95% confidence interval, 5.9-8.1) preintegration, and 6 days (95% confidence interval, 4.6-7.4) postintegration (P = 0.48). For preintegration, 9 (69%) of the patients experienced complications, compared with 7 (47%) postintegration (P = 0.23). CONCLUSIONS: After formation of an integrated orthopaedic trauma/microsurgery team, we observed a 1-day decrease in median days to coverage from index injury. Complications overall were lowered in the postintegration group, although statistically insignificant. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Long-Term Effectiveness of Repeat Corticosteroid Injections for Trigger Finger.

PURPOSE: To quantify the long-term success of repeat injections for trigger fingers and to identify predictors of treatment outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective case series analyzed 292 repeat corticosteroid injections for trigger fingers administered by hand surgeons at a single tertiary center between January 2010 and January 2013. One hundred eighty-seven patients (64%) were female, 139 patients (48%) had multiple trigger fingers, and 63 patients (22%) were diabetic. The primary outcome, treatment failure, was defined as receiving a subsequent injection or surgical treatment. Patients without either documented failure or a return office visit in 2015 or 2016 were surveyed by telephone to determine if they had required subsequent treatment. Kaplan-Meier analyses with log-rank testing assessed the median time to treatment failure and the effect of demographic and disease-specific characteristics on injection success rate and predictors of injection outcome (success vs failure) were assessed with multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Second injections provided long-term treatment success in 39% (111 of 285) of trigger fingers with 86 receiving an additional injection and 108 ultimately undergoing surgical release. Thirty-nine percent (24 of 62) of third injections resulted in long-term success, with 22 receiving an additional injection, and 23 ultimately undergoing surgery. Median times-to-failure for second and third injections were 371 and 407 days, respectively. Success curves did not differ significantly according to any patient or disease factor. Logistic regression identified that advancing patient age and injection for trigger thumb were associated with success of second injections. CONCLUSIONS: Thirty-nine percent of second and third corticosteroid injections for trigger finger yield long-term relief. Although most patients ultimately require surgical release, 50% of patients receiving repeat trigger injections realize 1 year or more of symptomatic relief. Repeat injections of trigger fingers should be considered in patients who prefer nonsurgical treatment. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.