Diet and eczema: a review of dietary supplements for the treatment of atopic dermatitis.

In the context of increasing popularity of "natural" alternatives to conventional medicine, several dietary supplements have gained the attention of researchers and consumers alike in the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). Readily available without a prescription and frequently perceived to have fewer side effects than traditional medications, these "natural" remedies may be featured in discussions with patients, and clinicians should therefore be familiar with their efficacy and safety. Based on trials to date, no dietary supplements can be recommended for routine use in the treatment of AD. However, some promising results have been noted from the use of probiotics and prebiotics taken in combination. Given significant differences in study design to date, however, further studies would be needed to clarify dose and strains of probiotics. Studies of vitamin D have been limited and have produced conflicting results, although further trials in selected subsets of patients may be indicated. Very limited data is available on fish oil supplements, while future studies on Chinese herbal medicine would require evaluation of comparable herbs and formulations. Finally, multiple trials of evening primrose oil and borage seed oil have shown improvement similar to placebo, and neither is currently recommended in eczema therapy.

Is apolipoprotein A-IV rate limiting in the intestinal transport and absorption of triglyceride?

Apolipoprotein A-IV (apoA-IV) is synthesized by the intestine and secreted when dietary fat is absorbed and transported into lymph associated with chylomicrons. We have recently demonstrated that loss of apoA-IV increases chylomicron size and delays its clearance from the blood. There is still uncertainty, however, about the precise role of apoA-IV on the transport of dietary fat from the intestine into the lymph. ApoA-IV knockout (KO) mice do not have a gross defect in dietary lipid absorption, as measured by oral fat tolerance and fecal fat measurements. Here, using the in vivo lymph fistula mouse model, we show that the cumulative secretion of triglyceride (TG) into lymph in apoA-IV KO mice is very similar to that of wild-type (WT) mice. However, the apoA-IV KO mice do have subtle changes in TG accumulation in the intestinal mucosa during a 6-h continuous, but not bolus, infusion of lipid. There are no changes in the ratio of esterified to free fatty acids in the intestinal mucosa of the apoA-IV KO, however. When we extended these findings, by giving a higher dose of lipid (6 µmol/h) and for a longer infusion period (8 h), we found no effect of apoA-IV KO on intestinal TG absorption. This higher lipid infusion most certainly stresses the intestine, as we see a drastically lower absorption of TG (in both WT and KO mice); however, the loss of A-IV does not exacerbate this effect. This supports our hypothesis that apoA-IV is not required for TG absorption in the intestine. Our data suggest that the mechanisms by which the apoA-IV KO intestine responds to intestinal lipid may not be different from their WT counterparts. We conclude that apoA-IV is not required for normal lymphatic transport of TG.

The transport of DDT from chylomicrons to adipocytes does not mimic triacylglycerol transport.

Despite being banned in the U.S., organochlorine toxins such as DDT are frequently detected in human adipose tissue. The main route of exposure is through the consumption of contaminated foods and subsequent intestinal packaging of DDT into chylomicrons. These chylomicrons, which also contain dietary triacylglycerol (TG), are delivered directly to peripheral tissues without first being metabolized by the liver. The physiological process by which these compounds are delivered from chylomicrons to adipose is not well understood, but is clinically relevant since it bypasses first-pass metabolism. Based on its highly lipophilic nature, it has been assumed that DDT is transferred to peripheral tissues similar to TG; however, this has not been measured. Here, we use the lymph fistula rat to isolate chylomicrons containing both DDT and TG. These chylomicrons are the in vivo DDT delivery vehicle. Using 3T3-L1 adipocytes, we investigated the rate at which DDT transfers from chylomicrons to adipocytes, and mediators of this process. This novel approach closely approximates the in vivo DDT exposure route. We show that: 1) DDT repartitions from chylomicrons to adipocytes, 2) this transport does not require hydrolysis of TG within the chylomicron, and is stimulated by the inhibition of LPL, 3) albumin does not inhibit DDT uptake, 4) DDT dissolved in DMSO does not appropriately mimic in vivo DDT transport; and most importantly, 5) DDT uptake from chylomicrons does not mimic the uptake of TG from the same particles. Understanding these factors is important for designing interventions for human populations exposed to DDT.

Pretreatment with anti-VEGF therapy may exacerbate inflammation in experimental acute colitis.

AIM: Our previous investigations of angiogenesis in inflammatory bowel disease showed that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) blockade reduced colonic neovascularization and inflammation. We hypothesized that pretreatment with bevacizumab, a monoclonal anti-VEGF antibody, would attenuate the severity of angiogenesis and inflammation in a murine model of colitis. METHODS: C57BL/6 mice were treated with intraperitoneal injections of bevacizumab (250 µg/dose) before induction of colitis with dextran sulfate sodium (DSS). The colons were examined at predetermined time points. Colonic inflammation and microvessel density were assessed microscopically. RESULTS: All mice acutely developed melena and weight loss (18.8% ± 1.1% control vs 20.2% ± 1.1% treated, P = .37) and regained a similar weight percentage after the recovery (26.5% ± 4.0% vs 20.9% ± 4.4%, P = .37). Microvessel density acutely increased in both groups in response to DSS, with a trend toward inhibited angiogenesis in the treated group at the conclusion of the acute phase (194,100 ± 14,240 vs 149,400 ± 17,590 µm(2), P = .11). Bevacizumab-treated mice exhibited significantly increased inflammation after the acute phase (8.3 ± 0.8 vs 13.0 ± 2.0, P = .05), but were similar to control after the recovery (7.3 ± 1.5 vs 5.5 ± 1.0, P = .27). CONCLUSIONS: Preemptive VEGF inhibition does not significantly attenuate angiogenesis and, in fact, worsens inflammation in a model of acute colitis. Preventive VEGF blockade may disrupt healing and exacerbate injury via alternative angiogenic or inflammatory pathways.

EGFR inhibition fails to suppress vascular proliferation and tumor growth in a Ewing's sarcoma model.

BACKGROUND: Expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a potent regulator of cellular homeostasis, is associated with aggressive tumor behavior. The mechanism by which EGFR inhibition functions is unclear, with controversial results demonstrating an effect on the tumor cells, endothelial cells, or pericytes. EGFR activation has been linked to the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a known mitogen of angiogenesis, but the relationship between these factors and their effect on tumor vessel development is vague. We hypothesized that using an EGFR inhibitor on a human Ewing's sarcoma model would inhibit tumor growth by suppressing vessel proliferation. METHODS: A cell proliferation assay was performed on the Ewing's sarcoma (SK-NEP-1) cell line. Tumor cells were implanted intrarenally in athymic mice. Animals received daily gavage with vehicle or gefitinib 1 wk following implantation. Mice (n = 12/cohort) were euthanized 6 wk following implantation. Remaining mice were maintained without treatment for 2 wk. Vascular changes were assessed by angiography and immunohistochemically. EGFR and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression were quantified using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). RESULTS: Gefitinib suppressed in vitro cell growth with an IC(50) = 1.36 µM. Minimal tumor growth suppression was noted at 6 wk (6.01 ± 1.2 g in control versus 4.61 ± 0.9 g treated, P = 0.36). After cessation of gefitinib, tumor growth was increased in both groups (7.37 ± 1.62 g versus 6.77 ± 1.53 g, P = 0.79). Microvessel density was unchanged despite EGFR inhibition (161,000 ± 16,000 pixels versus 135,000 ± 18,000 pixels, P = 0.31). At 6 wk, the vascular maturity index was similar in both groups (3.63 ± 1.12 versus 4.09 ± 1.71, P = 0.83). A downward trend in EGFR expression (49% of control) and an upward trend in VEGF levels (50% of control) occurred in the treated group. CONCLUSIONS: EGFR expression was suppressed in cultured cells and xenograft tumors. Despite a cytotoxic effect on cell lines, gefitinib had little effect on tumor growth. No effects on the tumor vasculature were noted in the setting of EGFR suppression, suggesting that angiogenesis induced by SK-NEP-1 cells is refractory to EGFR inhibition. Interestingly, the resulting increase in VEGF expression following EGFR blockade, provides an alternative pro-angiogenic pathway promoting tumor survival.