Core Alzheimer's disease cerebrospinal fluid biomarker assays are not affected by aspiration or gravity drip extraction methods.

BACKGROUND: CSF biomarkers are well-established for routine clinical use, yet a paucity of comparative assessment exists regarding CSF extraction methods during lumbar puncture. Here, we compare in detail biomarker profiles in CSF extracted using either gravity drip or aspiration. METHODS: Biomarkers for ß-amyloidopathy (Aß1-42, Aß1-40), tauopathy (total tau), or synapse pathology (BACE1, Neurogranin Trunc-p75, α-synuclein) were assessed between gravity or aspiration extraction methods in a sub-population of the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study (cognitively normal, N = 36; mild cognitive impairment, N = 8; Alzheimer's disease, N = 6). RESULTS: High biomarker concordance between extraction methods was seen (concordance correlation > 0.85). Passing Bablock regression defined low beta coefficients indicating high scalability. CONCLUSIONS: Levels of these commonly assessed CSF biomarkers are not influenced by extraction method. Results of this study should be incorporated into new consensus guidelines for CSF collection, storage, and analysis of biomarkers.

Critical Steps to be Taken into Consideration Before Quantification of ß-Amyloid and Tau Isoforms in Blood can be Implemented in a Clinical Environment.

This review aims to document difficulties, limitations, and pitfalls when considering protein analysis in blood samples. It proposes an improved workflow for design, development, and validation of (immuno)assays for blood proteins, without providing reflections on a potential hypothesis of the origin of protein mismetabolism and deposition. There is a special focus on assay development for quantification of ß-amyloid (Aß) and tau in blood for diagnostic use or for integration in clinical trials in the field of Alzheimer's disease (AD).

Optimized Standard Operating Procedures for the Analysis of Cerebrospinal Fluid Aß42 and the Ratios of Aß Isoforms Using Low Protein Binding Tubes.

BACKGROUND: Reduced cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentration of amyloid-ß1-42 (Aß1-42) reflects the presence of amyloidopathy in brains of subjects with Alzheimer's disease (AD). OBJECTIVE: To qualify the use of Aß1-42/Aß1-40 for improvement of standard operating procedures (SOP) for measurement of CSF Aß with a focus on CSF collection, storage, and analysis. METHODS: Euroimmun ELISAs for CSF Aß isoforms were used to set up a SOP with respect to recipient properties (low binding, polypropylene), volume of tubes, freeze/thaw cycles, addition of detergents (Triton X-100, Tween-20) in collection or storage tubes or during CSF analysis. Data were analyzed with linear repeated measures and mixed effects models. RESULTS: Optimization of CSF analysis included a pre-wash of recipients (e.g., tubes, 96-well plates) before sample analysis. Using the Aß1-42/Aß1-40 ratio, in contrast to Aß1-42, eliminated effects of tube type, additional freeze/thaw cycles, or effect of CSF volumes for polypropylene storage tubes. 'Low binding' tubes reduced the loss of Aß when aliquoting CSF or in function of additional freeze/thaw cycles. Addition of detergent in CSF collection tubes resulted in an almost complete absence of variation in function of collection procedures, but affected the concentration of Aß isoforms in the immunoassay. CONCLUSION: The ratio of Aß1-42/Aß1-40 is a more robust biomarker than Aß1-42 toward (pre-) analytical interfering factors. Further, 'low binding' recipients and addition of detergent in collection tubes are able to remove effects of SOP-related confounding factors. Integration of the Aß1-42/Aß1-40 ratio and 'low-binding tubes' into guidance criteria may speed up worldwide standardization of CSF biomarker analysis.