Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Curr Oncol ; 28(2): 1197-1203, 2021 03 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33799451

RESUMO

Tobacco cessation has been recognized as an important goal for all ambulatory cancer centres to provide the best possible treatment outcomes and quality of life. However, cessation interventions are applied inconsistently in this setting, with less than one-half of tobacco users being offered evidence-based interventions. The 'opt-in' approach traditionally used in cessation, which targets patients who feel ready to quit, may limit the number of patients who are able to receive treatment, and evidence suggests that tobacco users quit at the same rate regardless of their perceived readiness. This paper reports the results of implementing a tobacco cessation framework utilizing the 3As and an 'opt-out' approach as a standard of cancer care at a Regional Cancer Centre. A comparison of data from 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 demonstrated an increase in the number of patients screened for tobacco use (76.9% to 90.1%, respectively), and in the number of accepted referrals to quit support (11.5% to 34.7%, respectively). The revised framework was effective at improving referral acceptance rates, despite tobacco use rates remaining stable among the two groups. This demonstrates that employing the 'opt-out' approach is a more effective strategy to connect patients with the smoking cessation supports required to optimize their cancer care.


Assuntos
Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Abandono do Uso de Tabaco , Humanos , Motivação , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Qualidade de Vida
2.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) ; 29(6): e13308, 2020 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32869387

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Patients adapt to cancer through self-management, which requires collaboration between patients and their healthcare providers. We aimed to describe patterns of patient-provider collaboration during radiotherapy and examine associations among patient-provider collaboration, self-management and well-being. METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted at a cancer centre in the province of Ontario, Canada. Cancer patients (N = 130) completed a one-time questionnaire during their radiotherapy. The questionnaire assessed three variables: collaboration with healthcare providers, self-management and well-being. Patterns of collaboration were analysed using descriptive statistics. Associations among study variables were assessed through structural equation modelling (SEM). Separate models were tested for patient-nurse and patient-oncologist collaboration. RESULTS: Participants reported greater collaboration with oncologists than with nurses or radiation therapists. Most participants reported no collaboration with other providers within healthcare teams (e.g. social workers, dietitians). SEM revealed different patterns for the patient-nurse and patient-oncologist collaboration models, where collaboration predicted one self-management aspect, and both physical and mental well-being. CONCLUSION: During radiotherapy, patients collaborated mainly with doctors, nurses and radiation therapists. Collaborative relationships between patients and providers may enhance patient outcomes by fostering their self-management skills. Initiatives to strengthen patient-provider relationships and support self-management should be developed and applied to interprofessional-cancer-care teams. IMPACT: This is the first known study to empirically support the links among patient-provider collaboration, self-management and patient outcomes. The study results can enhance practice, research and education.


Assuntos
Neoplasias , Autogestão , Comportamento Cooperativo , Estudos Transversais , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Ontário
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...