Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rev. Soc. Colomb. Oftalmol ; 56(2): 49-53, 2023. graf, tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS, COLNAL | ID: biblio-1525433

RESUMO

Background: Intraocular pressure (IOP) peaks are key factors on the onset and progression of glaucoma. The water drinking test (WDT) detects IOP fluctuations and estimates the maximum IOP. Objective: To assess the IOP variations during the WDT in patients diagnosed or suspected of glaucoma treated at an ophthalmology clinic. Methods: This is an observational, descriptive, and retrospective study, using clinical records of patients whom underwent the WDT between January 2017 and August 2019. Results: The study included 300 eyes. The WDT was positive in 23.3% of the eyes. Basal IOP at 15, 30, and 45 min, as well as the maximum pressure, presented a similar mean, median, and mode, as well as a varying coefficient without much variability. The negative test group had a maximum IOP of 18.9 mmHg, compared with 20.3 mmHg in the positive test group. Conclusion: In a Colombian cohort of patients with diagnosed or suspected glaucoma whom underwent a WDT, 23.3% had positive result. 90% of the tests were positive at the 30-min interval. This test is a complementary tool in the follow-up of patients with glaucoma.


Introducción: Los picos de presión intraocular son factores importantes para la aparición y progresión del glaucoma. La prueba de sobrecarga hídrica permite detectar fluctuaciones de presión intraocular y estimar la presión máxima. Objetivo: Evaluar las variaciones en la presión intraocular durante la prueba de sobrecarga hídrica en pacientes de una clínica oftalmológica. Métodos: Estudio observacional, descriptivo, retrospectivo de revisión de historias clínicas de pacientes sometidos a la prueba de sobrecarga hídrica entre enero de 2017 y agosto de 2019. Resultados: Se incluyeron 300 ojos. La prueba de sobrecarga hídrica fue positiva en el 23,3% de los ojos. La presión intraocular basal, a los 15, 30 y 45 min, al igual que la presión máxima, tuvieron una media, mediana y moda similares, con un coeficiente de variación sin mucha variabilidad. El grupo con resultados negativos tuvo una presión intraocular máxima de 18,9 mmHg comparado con 20,3 mmHg del grupo con resultados positivos. Conclusión: En una cohorte colombiana de pacientes con diagnóstico o sospecha de glaucoma quienes se les realizó la prueba de sobrecarga hídrica, el 23,3% tuvo resultados positivos. El 90% de las pruebas fueron positivas en el intervalo de 30 min. Esta prueba es una herramienta complementaria en el seguimiento de pacientes con glaucoma.


Assuntos
Humanos , Colômbia
2.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 69(9): 2430-2435, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34427237

RESUMO

Purpose: The keratoconus end-points assessment questionnaire (KEPAQ) is a disease-specific scale designed to evaluate the quality of life in keratoconus patients and provides the measurement of both functional and emotional compromise in keratoconus. It was previously developed, tested, and validated and now we want to evaluate the test-retest reliability of the KEPAQ, in an effort to contribute evidence on its internal consistency and capability of measuring clinical state with minimal inference of random chance. Methods: This is a prospective analytical study, designed to evaluate the test-retest reliability of the KEPAQ through the repeated application of the questionnaire to a group of clinically stable individuals. A number of patients with a confirmed diagnosis of keratoconus underwent double application of the KEPAQ, seven days apart. Mean KEPAQ score was obtained through Rasch analysis, while test-retest reliability was evaluated through Spearman rank-order correlation and intraclass correlation coefficient. Rasch analysis was performed in JMetrik version 4.1.1 (Psychomeasurement Systems LLC; Charlottesville, VA, USA) in a MacBook Air computer running macOS Catalina version 10.15.2 (Apple Inc.; Cupertino, CA, USA). Results: A total of 100 patients were included. For KEPAQ-E, Spearman correlation was R = 0.963 while ICC was 0.981 (95% confidence interval 0.972-0.987). For KEPAQ-F, Spearman correlation was R = 0.921 while ICC was 0.952 (95% confidence interval 0.929-0.968). Conclusion: The KEPAQ is a robust, well-developed, extremely reliable scale which can be confidently used for clinical and research endeavors.


Assuntos
Ceratocone , Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Ceratocone/diagnóstico , Ceratocone/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...