Randomized study between radical surgery and radiotherapy for the treatment of stage IB–IIA cervical cancer: 20-year update / 부인종양

OBJECTIVE: Stage IB–IIA cervical carcinoma can be equally cured either by radical surgery or radiotherapy (RT). Albeit such policies show the same efficacy, they carry a different morbidity. This is an update after 20 years of a previously published randomized trial of RT vs. surgery in the treatment of stage IB–IIA cervical cancers to assess long-term survival and morbidity and the different pattern of relapse between the 2 modalities. METHODS: Between September 1986 and December 1991, women referred for a newly diagnosed stage IB and IIA cervical carcinoma were randomized to radical surgery or RT. The primary outcome measures were long-term survival and complications rate. The secondary outcome was recurrence of the disease. RESULTS: Three-hundred forty-three eligible women were randomized: 172 to radical surgery and 171 to external RT. Minimum follow-up was 19 years. Thirty-three patients (10%) died of intercurrent disease (31 cases) or fatal complications (2 cases). Twenty-year overall survival is 72% and 77% in the 2 treatment groups (p=0.280), respectively. As a whole, 94 recurrences (28%) were observed. Median time to relapse was 13.5 (surgery group) and 11.5 months (radiotherapy group) (p=0.100), respectively. Multivariate analysis confirms that risk factors for survival are histotype (p=0.020), tumor diameter (p=0.008), and lymph node status (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The results of the present study seem to suggest that there is no treatment of choice for early stage cervical carcinoma in terms of survival. Long term follow-up confirms that the best treatment for the individual patient should take into account clinical factors such as menopausal status, comorbidities, histological type, and tumor diameter.

Squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) during follow-up of cervical cancer patients: Role in the early diagnosis of recurrence.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the potential benefit of routine squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) assessment during follow-up of patients after treatment for early cervical cancer with regard to early diagnosis of cancer recurrence before clinical signs and symptoms occur. METHODS: All clinical, pathological, and serological data of patients referred to the Department of Gynecologic Oncology between July 1999 and June 2014, were retrospectively collected and analyzed. The SCC-Ag levels of 197 patients with diagnosis of stage I or II cervical squamous carcinoma, were performed. RESULTS: In the univariate analysis, serum SCC-Ag was not significantly associated with grading (p=0.85), LVSI (p=0.95) and FIGO stage (p=0.83) but it was significantly associated with recurrence of disease (p<0.001). The Cox multivariate analyses showed that serum SCC-Ag level was an independent and statistically significant prognostic factor for OS and PFS. The median time interval between SCC-Ag test and diagnosis of recurrence were 0.3 and 1.8months for positive and negative SCC-Ag groups respectively (p=0.01). Considering patients with recurrence, no significant difference in terms of DFS and OS was found between women with high or low SCC-Ag levels. CONCLUSIONS: Serum SCC-Ag reflects the response to treatment, and rising antigen levels often precede the clinical detection of recurrent disease, and may lead to early diagnosis. However such an advantage does not seem to improve the cure rate of patients with elevated SCC-Ag levels, most likely due to the lack of curative salvage treatments.