Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pain Manag Nurs ; 19(6): 693-706, 2018 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29935909

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Mild-to-moderate bone pain is the most commonly reported adverse event associated with pegfilgrastim. AIMS: To investigate the effect of bone pain education on pegfilgrastim-related bone pain in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim. DESIGN: Randomized, single-blind study. SETTINGS: Forty-eight community oncology clinics throughout the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred women ≥18 years of age with newly diagnosed stage I -III breast cancer, who were planning ≥4 cycles of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy with pegfilgrastim support starting in cycle 1. METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to view a general education DVD on chemotherapy side effects (GE-DVD) or a DVD on bone pain following chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim (BP-DVD). Patients recorded severity of bone pain on a scale of 0-10, location of pain, and use of bone pain medications (i.e., analgesics, antihistamines, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) for 5 days, beginning on the day of pegfilgrastim administration, in each of the first four chemotherapy cycles. RESULTS: Patient-reported maximum bone pain was similar in the two groups (GE-DVD vs BP-DVD: cycle 1, 3.2 vs. 3.5, p = .3479; across all cycles, 4.1 vs. 4.6, p = .2196). Other measures of bone pain were also similar between the groups. Bone pain was highest in cycle 1 but decreased and then remained stable in subsequent cycles. Bone pain medication use was similar in both groups and was highest in cycle 1. CONCLUSIONS: The bone pain-specific education evaluated here did not improve perceptions of bone pain reported in this patient population.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Intratável/prevenção & controle , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Idoso , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Feminino , Filgrastim/administração & dosagem , Filgrastim/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Manejo da Dor/enfermagem , Medição da Dor , Dor Intratável/enfermagem , Polietilenoglicóis/administração & dosagem , Polietilenoglicóis/uso terapêutico , Método Simples-Cego , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Gravação em Vídeo
2.
Support Care Cancer ; 26(4): 1323-1334, 2018 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29147854

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Mild-to-moderate bone pain is a commonly reported adverse event (AE) associated with pegfilgrastim. We evaluated the effect of prophylactic naproxen or loratadine vs no prophylactic treatment on pegfilgrastim-associated bone pain. METHODS: In this open-label study (NCT01712009), women ≥ 18 years of age with newly diagnosed stage I-III breast cancer and an ECOG performance status ≤ 2 who were planning ≥ 4 cycles of adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy with pegfilgrastim support starting in cycle 1 were randomized 1:1:1 to receive naproxen, loratadine, or no treatment to prevent pegfilgrastim-associated bone pain. The primary endpoint was all-grade bone pain in cycle 1 from AE reporting. Secondary endpoints included bone pain in cycles 2-4 and across all cycles from AE reporting and patient-reported bone pain by cycle and across all cycles. RESULTS: Six hundred patients were enrolled. Most patients (83.0%) were white, and mean (SD) age was 54.2 (11.1) years. The percentage of patients with all-grade bone pain in cycle 1 from AE reporting in the naproxen, loratadine, and no prophylaxis groups was 40.3, 42.5, and 46.6%, respectively; differences between the treatment groups were not statistically significant. Maximum, mean, and area under the curve for patient-reported bone pain were consistently lower in the naproxen and loratadine groups than in the no prophylaxis group; some of these differences were significant. Loratadine was associated with fewer treatment-related AEs and discontinuations than naproxen. CONCLUSIONS: Given its tolerability, its ease of administration, and its potential benefit, treatment with loratadine should be considered to help prevent bone pain in patients receiving chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ; NCT01712009.


Assuntos
Doenças Ósseas/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Loratadina/uso terapêutico , Naproxeno/uso terapêutico , Dor/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Doenças Ósseas/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Feminino , Filgrastim/efeitos adversos , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/etiologia , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Polietilenoglicóis/efeitos adversos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...