Differentiating amoebic ulcero-haemorrhagic recto-colitis from idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease: still a diagnostic dilemma.

The colon responds monomorphically to a variety of insults thus making it difficult to differentiate invasive amoebic colitis and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The authors present a case with chronic dysentery, haematochezia, anaemia and hypoproteinaemia. The endoscopic findings were suggestive of IBD. The stool examination was negative for trophozoites or cysts of parasites. The recto-colonic biopsy specimens showed mucosal inflammation with exudates containing amoebic trophozoites. The patient was successfully treated with metronidazole and iodoquinol. He recovered within two weeks and repeat colonoscopy four weeks after the treatment showed a normal rectum and colon. Clinicians should have a high level of suspicion for amoebic colitis in cases of colitis especially in regions where amoebiasis is still present. Efforts should be made to find the amoebic trophozoites in multiple stool and colonic biopsy specimens.

Differentiating amoebic ulcero-haemorrhagic recto-colitis from idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease: still a diagnostic dilemma / Diferenciar la Rectocolitis Úlcero-hemorrágica Amebiana de la Enfermedad Inflamatoria Idiopática del Intestino: un Dilema Diagnóstico sin Resolver

The colon responds monomorphically to a variety of insults thus making it difficult to differentiate invasive amoebic colitis and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The authors present a case with chronic dysentery, haematochezia, anaemia and hypoproteinaemia. The endoscopic findings were suggestive of IBD. The stool examination was negative for trophozoites or cysts of parasites. The recto-colonic biopsy specimens showed mucosal inflammation with exudates containing amoebic trophozoites. The patient was successfully treated with metronidazole and iodoquinol. He recovered within two weeks and repeat colonoscopy four weeks after the treatment showed a normal rectum and colon. Clinicians should have a high level of suspicion for amoebic colitis in cases of colitis especially in regions where amoebiasis is still present. Efforts should be made to find the amoebic trophozoites in multiple stool and colonic biopsy specimens

El colon responde de manera monomórfica a una variedad de insultos, lo cual hace difícil distinguir entre la colitis amebiana invasiva y la enfermedad intestinal inflamatoria (EII). Los autores presentan un caso con disentería crónica, hematoquexia, anemia e hipoproteinemia. Los resultados endoscópicos apuntaban a una EII. El análisis de las heces fecales arrojó resultados negativos en cuanto a presencia de trofozoitos o quistes de parásitos. Esto condujo a un diagnóstico erróneo y el paciente fue tratado por una EII. Sin embargo, los especímenes de la biopsia rectocolónica mostraron una inflamación mucosal con exudados en los que se hallaban presentes trofozoitos amebianos. El paciente tuvo un tratamiento exitoso con metronidazol y iodoquinol. Se recuperó en dos semanas, y se le repitió la colonoscopia cuatro semanas después de que el tratamiento mostró un recto y colon normales. Los clínicos debían mostrar un alto nivel de sospecha ante la colitis amebiana, especialmente en aquellas regiones donde la amebiasis todavía está presente. Deben hacerse esfuerzos por encontrar trofozoitos amebianos en múltiples especímenes de heces fecales y biopsia colónica.