Empirical selection between least-cost and current-flow designs for establishing wildlife corridors in Gabon.

Corridors are intended to increase species survival by abating landscape fragmentation resulting from the conversion of natural habitats into human-dominated matrices. Conservation scientists often rely on 1 type of corridor model, typically the least-cost model or current-flow model, to construct a linkage design, and their choice is not usually based on theory or empirical evidence. We developed a method to empirically confirm whether corridors produced by these 2 models are used by target species under current landscape conditions. We applied this method in the Gamba landscape between 2 national parks in southwestern Gabon. We collected signs of presence of African forest elephant (Loxodonta cyclotis), forest buffalo (Syncerus caffer nanus), and 2 apes, western lowland gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) and central chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes troglodytes), on transects. We used patch-occupancy models to identify least-cost and current-flow corridors for these 4 species. On average, 28.7% of current-flow corridors overlapped with least-cost corridors, confirming that the choice of corridor model can affect the location of the resulting linkage design. We validated these corridors by monitoring signs and examining camera detections on new transects within and outside modeled corridors. Current-flow corridors performed better than least-cost corridors for elephants, whereas the opposite was found for buffalo and apes. Locations of the highest priority corridors for the 3 taxa did not overlap, and only 18.3% of their combined surface was common among 2 species. We used centrality metrics to calculate the average contribution of corridor pixels to landscape connectivity and derived an index that can be used to prioritize corridors. As a result, we recommend protecting at least 17.4% of the land surface area around Gamba town to preserve the preferred travel routes of the target species.

Selección Empírica entre Diseños de Menor Costo y de Flujo de Corriente para Establecer Corredores de Fauna en Gabón Resumen La intención de los corredores es incrementar la supervivencia de las especies abatiendo la fragmentación del paisaje que resulta de la conversión de los hábitats naturales en matrices dominadas por humanos. Los científicos de la conservación con frecuencia dependen de un tipo de modelo de corredor, comúnmente el modelo de menor costo o el de flujo de corriente para construir un diseño de conexiones y su elección no suele estar basada en evidencia teórica o empírica. Desarrollamos un método para confirmar empíricamente si los corredores producidos por estos dos modelos son usados por las especies diana bajo las condiciones actuales del paisaje. Aplicamos este método en el paisaje de Gamba entre dos parques nacionales al suroeste de Gabón. Recolectamos señales de la presencia del elefante de bosque africano (Loxodonta cyclotis), el búfalo de bosque (Syncerus caffer nanus), y dos primates: el gorila occidental de tierras bajas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) y el chimpancé central (Pan troglodytes troglodytes) a lo largo de transectos en esta zona. Usamos modelos de ocupación de fragmentos para identificar los corredores de menor costo y los de flujo de corriente para estas cuatro especies. En promedio, el 28.7% de los corredores de flujo de corriente se traslaparon con los corredores de menor costo, lo que confirmó que la elección de modelo de corredor puede afectar la ubicación del diseño de conexiones resultante. Validamos estos corredores por medio del monitoreo de señales y la examinación de detecciones con cámaras en transectos nuevos dentro y fuera de los corredores modelados. Los corredores de flujo de corriente tuvieron un mejor desempeño que los corredores de menor costo para los elefantes, mientras que fue el caso contrario para los búfalos y los primates. La ubicación de los corredores con mayor prioridad para los tres taxones no se traslapó y sólo el 18.3% de las superficies combinadas fue común para dos especies. Usamos medidas de centralidad para calcular la contribución promedio de los pixeles del corredor hacia la conectividad del paisaje y derivamos un índice que puede usarse para priorizar los corredores. Como resultado de nuestro estudio recomendamos proteger al menos el 17.4% del área de superficie terrestre alrededor del poblado de Gamba para preservar las rutas de viaje de las especies diana.

Antipoaching standards in onshore hydrocarbon concessions drawn from a Central African case study.

Unsustainable hunting outside protected areas is threatening tropical biodiversity worldwide and requires conservationists to engage increasingly in antipoaching activities. Following the example of ecocertified logging companies, we argue that other extractive industries managing large concessions should engage in antipoaching activities as part of their environmental management plans. Onshore hydrocarbon concessions should also adopt antipoaching protocols as a standard because they represent a biodiversity threat comparable to logging. We examined the spatiotemporal patterns of small- and large-mammal poaching in an onshore oil concession in Gabon, Central Africa, with a Bayesian occupancy model based on signs of poaching collected from 2010 to 2015 on antipoaching patrols. Patrol locations were initially determined based on local intelligence and past patrol successes (adaptive management) and subsequently with a systematic sampling of the concession. We generated maps of poaching probability in the concession and determined the temporal trends of this threat over 5 years. The spatiotemporal patterns of large- and small-mammal poaching differed throughout the concession, and likely these groups will need different management strategies. By elucidating the relationship between site-specific sampling effort and detection probability, the Bayesian method allowed us to set goals for future antipoaching patrols. Our results indicate that a combination of systematic sampling and adaptive management data is necessary to infer spatiotemporal patterns with the statistical method we used. On the basis of our case study, we recommend hydrocarbon companies interested in implementing efficient antipoaching activities in their onshore concessions to lay the foundation of long-needed industry standards by: adequately measuring antipoaching effort; mixing adaptive management and balanced sampling; setting goals for antipoaching effort; pairing patrols with large-mammal monitoring; supporting antipoaching patrols across the landscape; restricting access to their concessions; performing random searches for bushmeat and mammal products at points of entry; controlling urban and agricultural expansion; supporting bushmeat alternatives; and supporting land-use planning.