Relative reliability of five serially measured markers for prognosis of progression in prostate cancer.

During an 8-year period, 1,065 serum specimens were collected from 79 patients with prostate cancer of stages B2 to D1 (group I) and 51 patients with newly diagnosed stage D2 prostate cancer (group II) to evaluate statistically the relative reliability of elevated tumor-associated markers for progressive disease in prostate cancer. Forty of the group I patients and 21 of the group II patients presented a clinical progression of disease during follow-up. With the use of Gail's modification of Cox's regression model, serial acid phosphatase (AcP), total alkaline phosphatase (TAP), bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), and prostate-specific antigen (PA) were analyzed. Results from group I patients revealed that only PA (P = .0002) and PAP (P = .0684) were prognostically important markers for detection of imminent disease progression. However, all markers were prognostically important in group II patients. Comparative studies indicated that PA (P = .0052) and PAP (P = .0359) were the more reliable markers for group I patients, whereas PA (P less than .0001), BAP (P = .0007), and PAP (P = .0206) were the more reliable markers for group II patients. Multivariate analyses revealed that, after adjustment for the effect of PA, no other marker was significantly related to the risk of progression. Elevated PA levels were predictive of increased risk 6 months before disease progression in group I patients only (P less than .0001). Overall, the apparent order of prognostic reliability for disease progression was found to be PA greater than PAP greater than BAP greater than AcP greater than TAP.

Prognostic importance of prostate-specific antigen for monitoring patients with stages B2 to D1 prostate cancer.

To evaluate the prognostic value of prostate-specific antigen (PA) for detection of tumor growth after definitive therapy, 602 sera from 70 patients with stages B2 to D1 prostate cancer (26 of whom recurred) were analyzed in a blind study. Using Cox's proportional-hazards model, a highly significant association was found between serially measured PA and disease-free survival time (p = 0.0002). A positive predictive value of 100% was found for some markedly elevated PA levels and confirmed recurrence of disease. In fact, this study suggested that once a PA level of 88 ng/ml was reached, there was an average time of less than 2 months before a recurrence was clinically confirmed. Tumor growth in patients who recurred was indicated by a PA elevation before recurrence in 92% (24 of 26) as opposed to 20% (9 of 44) in disease-free patients. Additionally, in these 24 of 26 patients, levels of PA were elevated 12 months (mean lead time) before a confirmed disease recurrence. In patients who were still disease free, serial PA appeared to increase concurrently with putative tumor growth as shown by the initial surgical stage. Generally, the greater the PA level the more advanced was the stage of disease (B2 to D1). These data suggest that PA may be a useful adjuvant marker for monitoring tumor growth in patients with regionally confined prostate cancer.

Prostate-specific acid phosphatase versus acid phosphatase in monitoring patients with prostate cancer.

Serial levels of PAP and AcP activity were compared for their relative values in monitoring 57 early and 33 advanced prostate cancer patients. Several findings regarding the patients' disease status and the enzyme levels have been observed that may be beneficial to therapeutic management of these patients. They are: [1] an elevated PAP activity in disease recurrence and disease progression generally precedes an elevated AcP activity, and thus represents a more sensitive index for patients with early and advanced disease; [2] serial mean levels of PAP activity greater than the mean + 3 SD are more predictive for disease recurrence and progression than are those of AcP activity in both groups of patients; [3] PAP activity is a more sensitive monitor for changes in objective treatment response than is AcP activity; and [4] PAP is more specific than AcP for prostate, thus offering a more reliable marker to identify metastasis of unknown origin, or to confirm metastasis derived from a primary prostate tumor that may have been suggested by other non-prostate-specific marker[s]. In addition, data suggest a favorable prognosis for patients receiving therapy as inferred by a serial mean of PAP activity that is less than mean + 3 SD.

The use of serum isoenzymes of alkaline and acid phosphatase as possible quantitative markers of tumor load in prostate cancer.

The tumor burden of 98 patients with metastatic prostatic cancer was compared longitudinally with the activities of bone (BAP) and liver isoenzymes (LAP) of alkaline phosphatase, total acid phosphatase (AcP), and prostate-specific acid phosphatase (PAP). A quantitative association between these enzyme markers and the tumor mass was suggested by comparing the enzymes with 1) both the treatment response and the estimation of metastasis by radionuclide bone scanning; 2) metastasis based upon radiographic evidence. In addition, an apparent extensive pretreatment bone tumor load was predictive for an elevated BAP activity, which was also a suggestive poor prognosis as previously reported. An elevation of PAP, in contrast to AcP, may precede the clinical disease progression in some patients. Data presented in this report have indicated that the levels of these enzymes compared well with the extent of tumor involvement and therefore may be considered suitable as adjuvant and even quantitative biochemical markers of bone and liver metastasis.

Quantitative counterimmunoelectrophoresis assay for prostatic acid phosphatase.

We developed two quantitative counterimmunoelectrophoretic (CIEP) assays to detect serum prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP). The assays were designated counterimmunoelectrophoresis-colorimetric (CIE-C) and counterimmunoelectrophoresis-densitometric (CIE-D). One unique feature of these assays was the use of a primary standard for the quantitation of PAP. The sensitivities of the assays were 0.08 and 0.04 IU per liter for CIE-C and CIE-D, respectively. Precision coefficients of variation and recovery studies for four levels of PAP over a 3-month period have shown the reliability of these newly modified assays. PAP activity in sera from patients with early stages of prostatic cancer which was demonstrated to be normal by conventional chemical methods was found to be elevated by the conbined methods in a substantial number.