Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 25(2): 277-286, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28797657

RESUMO

Preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal mortality and morbidity. Multiple interventions are available to minimize this occurrence; however, despite current recommendations including medical management, cervical length screening, and transvaginal cerclage, a substantial number of women still experience preterm birth. For those patients, experts recommend transabdominal cerclage (TAC). In this systematic review, we compared 26 studies (1116 patients) of TAC placed via laparotomy (TAC-lap) and 15 studies (728 patients) of TAC placed via laparoscopy (TAC-lsc). There was no significant difference in overall neonatal survival between the TAC-lsc and TAC-lap groups (89.9% vs 90.8%, respectively; p = .80). When T1 losses were excluded, the neonatal survival rate was significantly higher for the TAC-lsc group (96.5% vs 90.1%; p < .01). In terms of obstetrical outcomes, the TAC-lsc group had a higher rate of deliveries at gestational age (GA) > 34 weeks (82.9% vs 76%; p < .01) and a lower rate of deliveries at GA 23.0 to 33.6 weeks (6.8% vs 14.8%; p < .01). The TAC-lsc group also had fewer T2 losses (3.2% vs 7.8%; p < .01). TAC-lsc offers all the benefits of minimally invasive surgery with better obstetrical outcomes compared with TAC-lap.


Assuntos
Cerclagem Cervical/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Nascimento Prematuro/prevenção & controle , Abdome/cirurgia , Adulto , Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Parto Obstétrico/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Laparotomia , Gravidez , Análise de Sobrevida
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...