Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Viruses ; 11(2)2019 02 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30781518

RESUMO

Following the largest Ebola virus disease outbreak from 2013 to 2016, viral RNA has been detected in survivors from semen and breast milk long after disease recovery. However, as there have been few cases of sexual transmission, it is unclear whether every RNA positive fluid sample contains infectious virus. Virus isolation, typically using cell culture or animal models, can serve as a tool to determine the infectivity of patient samples. However, the sensitivity of these methods has not been assessed for the Ebola virus isolate, Makona. Described here is an efficiency comparison of Ebola virus Makona isolation using Vero E6, Huh-7, monocyte-derived macrophage cells, and suckling laboratory mice. Isolation sensitivity was similar in all methods tested. Laboratory mice and Huh-7 cells were less affected by toxicity from breast milk than Vero E6 and MDM cells. However, the advantages associated with isolation in Huh-7 cells over laboratory mice, including cost effectiveness, sample volume preservation, and a reduction in animal use, make Huh-7 cells the preferred substrate tested for Ebola virus Makona isolation.


Assuntos
Ebolavirus/isolamento & purificação , Virologia/métodos , Animais , Animais Lactentes , Linhagem Celular , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Chlorocebus aethiops , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/virologia , Humanos , Macrófagos/virologia , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos BALB C , Leite Humano/virologia , Sêmen/virologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Células Vero
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...