Can In-house HIV-2 Viral Load Assay be a Reliable Alternative to Commercial Assays for Clinical and Therapeutic Monitoring?

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is a global contemplation to end the AIDS epidemic by 2030. HIV-2 poses unique challenges to this end. The burden of HIV-2 is higher in resource-limited countries, and it is intrinsically resistant to NNRTI drugs. In addition, there is no FDA-approved plasma viral load assay to monitor disease progression and therapeutic efficacy. To overcome these challenges, we have developed and evaluated an in-house quantitative HIV-2 viral load assay. METHODS: Blood samples were collected from 28 HIV-2 treatment-naïve monoinfected individuals and tested using an in-house qPCR HIV-2 viral load assay. The extracted RNA was amplified using Quantifast pathogen + IC kit. RESULTS: The in-house qPCR has a limit of detection of 695 copies/ml. The intra- and inter-assay variation (% CV) of the assay was 0.61 and 0.95, respectively. The in-house assay quantified HIV-2 NIBSC accurately (1000 IU) with a mean of 1952 copies/mL. Among the 28 samples tested by in-house qPCR assay, 11 (39.2%) samples were quantified, whereas 17 (60.7%) samples were not detected. In comparison with Altona RealStar HIV-2 RT PCR and Exavir Load RT assay, the results were 96.4% and 69.6% concordant, respectively. No significant (p = 0.99 and p = 0.13) difference in quantifying viral load between the three assays. Based on clinical and immunological (CD4) staging, the performance characteristics were comparable. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first in-house qPCR developed in India. The performance characteristics of the in-house assay are comparable to the commercial assays, and they can be used assertively to monitor HIV-2 patients.

Chronic Immune Activation Among Treatment Naïve HIV/ HBV Coinfected Individuals From Southern India.

BACKGROUND: Chronic immune activation is one of the most widely recognized hallmarks of HIV infection. T-cells that express CD38+ and HLA-DR+ show poor proliferative potential, signal transduction, and increased apoptotic potential. This affects HIV pathogenesis and its outcome and further complicates with a coinfection like HBV. METHODS: Study Design: cross-sectional. Blood samples were collected and analyzed for virological markers using ELISA for HBeAg and RT-PCR for HIV&HBV Viral load. Chronic immune activation markers of CD8+ and CD4+ T cells were measured by Flow cytometry for both HIV and HBV. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in HBV replication shown by higher HBV DNA (p=0.002), a higher proportion of HBeAg (p=0.0049), and lower CD4 counts (p=0.04) among HIV/HBV coinfected individuals, compared to the monoinfected groups. The frequencies of CD4+ CD38+ HLA-DR+ and CD8+ CD38+ HLA-DR+ in the HIV/HBV coinfection were significantly higher than HBV monoinfected group (P< 0.0001) and in the HIV monoinfected group (P < 0.0001). The Liver fibrosis score APRI and FIB-4, were higher in the coinfected group compared with HBV monoinfected group (0.67 vs. 0.25, p = 0.0085; 3.48 vs. 0.98, p = 0.0026) respectively. The cytokine levels of IL-17, Fas-L,TNF -α, IL-10, IL-2 and Granzyme B were also measured and compared among the study groups. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that HIV probably influences immune activation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and this may play a significant role in accelerating the disease outcome among HIV/HBV coinfected individuals.

Autoantibodies Among HIV-1 Infected Individuals and the Effect of Anti-Retroviral Therapy (ART) on It.

BACKGROUND: Antiretroviral therapy (ART) has led to a decline in autoimmune diseases but lacks studies on its effect on autoantibodies. METHODS: It is a cross-sectional study with archived samples from 100 paired HIV-1 infected ART naïve and experienced individuals and 100 prospectively collected matched blood-donor controls. Antinuclear antibody, IgG anticardiolipin antibody, IgM and IgG ß2 glycoprotein-1 antibodies, and total IgG levels were detected. Results are expressed as mean with standard deviation (SD), median, percentage positivity, and a p<0.05 is considered significant. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. RESULTS: The median viral load of the treatment naïve samples was 4.34 Log copies/mL, while all were virally suppressed post ART with a median duration of treatment for 12 months (range: 3-36 months). The percentage of antinuclear antibody positivity was 5% among ART naïve and controls, with a decrease of 2% post ART (p= 0.441). The positivity for anti-cardiolipin antibody was 15% among ART naïve while none of the ART experienced or controls were positive (p<0.05). IgM ß2 glycoprotein-1 were 4%, 1% and 3% among ART naïve, treated and controls, respectively (p<0.05). IgG ß2 glycoprotein-1 was 2% among ART naïve while none of the treated and controls were positive (p<0.05). The mean total IgG level among ART naïve, experienced, and controls were 21.82 (SD 6.67), 16.91 (SD 3.38), 13.70 (SD 2.24) grams/Litre, respectively (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: ART has a significant effect on IgG anti-cardiolipin antibody and total IgG but only a marginal effect on ANA, IgM, and IgG ß2 glycoprotein-1 antibodies.