Outcome of Targeted vs Empiric Antibiotic Therapy in the Treatment of Spondylodiscitis: A Retrospective Analysis of 201 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic treatment of spondylodiscitis is influenced by antibiotic stewardship; specifically, empirical antibiotic therapy is avoided in favor of-delayed-targeted antibiotic therapy after microbiological diagnosis. Only patients with neurological deficits or clinical signs of sepsis should be treated by empirical antibiotic therapy. However, the level of evidence for this treatment concept is weak. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether patients who were treated with a nontargeted antibiotic therapy show a worse outcome than patients who were exclusively treated with targeted antibiotic therapy. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A retrospective single-center data analysis. PATIENT SAMPLE: We included 201 patients with spondylodiscitis who were treated at the authors' institution between 2013 and 2020. OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality rate, time in hospital, development of laboratory parameters, and development of pain (visual analog scale). METHODS: We performed a retrospective data analysis of patients who were treated for spondylodiscitis from January 2013 to March 2020. Clinical and demographic data as well as outcome and complications were recorded and analyzed. We investigated whether patients who were treated by a nontargeted antibiotic therapy had a worse outcome than patients who were exclusively treated by targeted antibiotic therapy and which other clinical factors had an impact on clinical outcome. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients were included, 37 of whom developed sepsis during their hospital stay, and 14 of these 37 patients died. The 14 patients who died represented (10.0%) of the subgroup who received an empirical antibiotic treatment before the targeted antibiotic therapy (n = 141). There were 0 deaths in the subgroup who did not receive an empirical antibiotic treatment (P < 0.05). The time to diagnosis since admission to the hospital was 10.5 (2.2) days in patients with sepsis; in patients without sepsis, it was 5.2 (0.9) days (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of this investigation, the authors recommend delaying antibiotic therapy until targeted antibiotic therapy is possible. Furthermore, early diagnosis of spondylodiscitis and prevention and early detection of sepsis are essential to reduce the mortality rate of patients with spondylodiscitis.

Successful implementation of new Swiss recommendations on breastfeeding of infants born to women living with HIV.

INTRODUCTION: Swiss national recommendations advise, since end of 2018, supporting women with HIV who wish to breastfeed. Our objective is to describe the motivational factors and the outcome of these women and of their infants. METHODS: mothers included in MoCHiV with a delivery between January 2019 and February 2021 who fulfilled the criteria of the "optimal scenario" (adherence to cART, regular clinical care, and suppressed HIV plasma viral load (pVL) of <50 RNA copies/ml) and who decided to breastfeed after a shared decision-making process, were approached to participate in this nested study and asked to fill-in a questionnaire exploring the main motivating factors for breastfeeding. RESULTS: Between January 9, 2019 and February 7, 2021, 41 women gave birth, and 25 decided to breastfeed of which 20 accepted to participate in the nested study. The three main motivational factors of these women were bonding, neonatal and maternal health benefits. They breastfed for a median duration of 6.3 months (range 0.7-25.7, IQR 2.5-11.1). None of the breastfed neonates received HIV post-exposure prophylaxis. There was no HIV transmission: 24 infants tested negative for HIV at least 3 months after weaning; one mother was still breastfeeding when we analyzed the data. CONCLUSIONS: As a result of a shared decision-making process, a high proportion of mothers expressed a desire to breastfeed. No breastfed infant acquired HIV. The surveillance of breastfeeding mother-infant pairs in high resource settings should be continued to help update guidelines and recommendations.

Infection control of COVID-19 in pediatric tertiary care hospitals: challenges and implications for future pandemics.

BACKGROUND: More than 2 years into the COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 still impacts children's health and the management of pediatric hospitals. However, it is unclear which hygiene and infection control measures are effective and useful for pediatric hospitals. Here, we report infection control measures implemented at a tertiary care children's hospital. We evaluated frequency of SARS-CoV-2 detection in admitted patients, in-hospital transmission and infection related findings. Furthermore, we aimed to capture perspectives of health-care workers and caregivers on effectiveness and burden of infection control measures. Knowledge gained can inform management of the ongoing and future pandemics. METHODS: We designed a retrospective observational study and survey at a pediatric tertiary care referral center. Local infection control measures and respective guidelines regarding COVID-19 were reviewed. Three thousand seven hundred sixteen children under 18 years were tested for SARS-CoV-2 at the University Children's Hospital Tuebingen and data on SARS-CoV-2 transmission were retrieved from internal records. Two surveys were conducted among 219 staff members and 229 caregivers. RESULTS: Local infection control measures comprised the formation of a task force, triage, protective hygiene measures and an adaptable SARS-CoV-2 test strategy. Between January 2020 and March 2021, SARS-CoV-2 infection was detected in 37 children presenting to our hospital, 21 of these were admitted. One hospital-acquired infection occurred. About 90% of health-care staff perceived the majority of measures as effective and appropriate. However, visitor restrictions and cancellation of scheduled treatments were perceived least effective by hospital staff and as a particular burden for patients and their caregivers. Visits at the pediatric emergency department significantly decreased during the pandemic. We drafted a pandemic action plan by ranking infection control measures according to local transmission stages. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 infection control measures implemented in our tertiary care children's hospital were evaluated by health-care workers as mostly effective and appropriate. In particular, good communication, transparency of decision-making as well as universal masking and infection screening were assessed as successful measures of infection control management. Visitor restrictions and cancellation of routine appointments, in contrast, were perceived as a particular burden on patient care and should be avoided. An established pandemic action plan may guide children's hospitals in the future.

Genetic structure of SARS-CoV-2 reflects clonal superspreading and multiple independent introduction events, North-Rhine Westphalia, Germany, February and March 2020.

We whole-genome sequenced 55 SARS-CoV-2 isolates from Germany to investigate SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks in 2020 in the Heinsberg district and Düsseldorf. While the genetic structure of the Heinsberg outbreak indicates a clonal origin, reflecting superspreading dynamics from mid-February during the carnival season, distinct viral strains were circulating in Düsseldorf in March, reflecting the city's international links. Limited detection of Heinsberg strains in the Düsseldorf area despite geographical proximity may reflect efficient containment and contact-tracing efforts.

Reducing Hematologic Toxicity With Short Course Postexposure Prophylaxis With Zidovudine for HIV-1 Exposed Infants With Low Transmission Risk.

Using retrospectively collected data from 383 infants born to HIV-1-infected mothers receiving antiretroviral therapy, we compared transmission rates and hematologic toxicity between infants receiving 2-week (short course) versus longer duration zidovudine postexposure prophylaxis. Short course resulted in lower hematologic toxicity without evidence of increased vertical transmission risk.