EAONO/JOS classification for acquired cholesteatoma: evaluating the impact of the number of affected sites on treatment and outcomes.

PURPOSE: The European and Japanese system for cholesteatoma classification proposed an anatomical differentiation in five sites. In stage I disease, one site would be affected and in stage II, two to five. We tested the significance of this differentiation by analyzing the influence of the number of affected sites on residual disease, hearing ability and surgical complexity. METHODS: Cases of acquired cholesteatoma treated at a single tertiary referral center between 2010-01-01 and 2019-07-31 were retrospectively analyzed. Residual disease was determined according to the system. The air-bone gap mean of 0.5, 1, 2, 3 kHz (ABG) and its change with surgery served as hearing outcome. The surgical complexity was estimated regarding the Wullstein's tympanoplasty classification and the procedure approach (transcanal, canal up/down). RESULTS: 513 ears (431 patients) were followed-up during 21.6 ± 21.5 months. 107 (20.9%) ears had one site affected, 130 (25.3%) two, 157 (30.6%) three, 72 (14.0%) four and 47 (9.2%) five. An increasing number of affected sites resulted in higher residual rates (9.4-21.3%, p = 0.008) and surgical complexity, as well poorer ABG (preoperative 14.1 to 25.3 dB, postoperative 11.3-16.8 dB, p < 0.001). These differences existed between the means of cases of stage I and II, but also when only considering ears with stage II classification. CONCLUSION: The data showed statistically significant differences when comparing the averages of ears with two to five affected sites, questioning the pertinence of the differentiation between stages I and II.

Analysis of surgical treatment strategy and outcome factors in persistent tracheoesophageal fistula: a critical analysis of own cases and review of the literature.

OBJECTIVE: Surgical closure of persistent tracheoesophageal fistulas (TEFs) is complex. Most patients present with multiple risk factors, which may negatively impact the outcome and influence the treatment strategies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 22 patients presenting with persistent TEFs. Preoperative RT, comorbidities, tissue conditions of the TEFs and neck skin, and surgical techniques were evaluated regarding a possible impact on success rates and outcome. RESULTS: 21 patients were operated, 95.45% with final success. However, in 52.39% repeated surgery was needed. Final closure of TEFs was achieved in 91.47% only after more invasive surgery was performed. The surgical technique applied had the most significant impact on success rates and outcome compared to all other risk factors analyzed. Our own data and that of the literature point out that the surgical strategy should be adapted to the patients' individual risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: According to the literature, surgical closure of persistent TEFss is demanding. Our data suggest that, considering that the majority of patients with persistent TEFs exhibit multiple risk factors, early performance of more invasive surgery seems associated with a better outcome.