RESUMO
The clonal evolution of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), an oligoclonal hematological malignancy, is driven by a plethora of cytogenetic abnormalities, gene mutations, abnormal epigenetic patterns, and aberrant gene expressions. These alterations in the leukemic blasts promote clinically diverse manifestations with common characteristics of high relapse and drug resistance. Defining and real-time monitoring of a personalized panel of these predictive genetic biomarkers is rapidly being adapted in clinical setting for diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic decision-making in AML. A major challenge remains the frequency of invasive biopsy procedures that can be routinely performed for monitoring of AML disease progression. Moreover, a single-site biopsy is not representative of the tumor heterogeneity as it is spatially and temporally constrained and necessitates the understanding of longitudinal and spatial subclonal dynamics in AML. Hematopoietic cells are a major contributor to plasma cell-free DNA, which also contain leukemia-specific aberrations as the circulating tumor-derived DNA (ctDNA) fraction. Plasma cell-free DNA analysis holds immense potential as a minimally invasive tool for genomic profiling at diagnosis as well as clonal evolution during AML disease progression. With the technological advances and increasing sensitivity for detection of ctDNA, both genetic and epigenetic aberrations can be qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated. However, challenges remain in validating the utility of liquid biopsy tools in clinics, and universal recommendations are still awaited towards reliable diagnostics and prognostics. Here, we provide an overview on the scope of ctDNA analyses for prognosis, assessment of response to treatment and measurable residual disease, prediction of disease relapse, development of acquired resistance and beyond in AML.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The genomic mutational landscape of Acute Myeloid Leukemia has contributed to better treatment options, risk stratification and prognostication of this genetically heterogeneous disease. With several approved new drugs targeting specific mutations with better outcomes, we describe here two cases of AML in which, NPM1 was detected at diagnosis. The impact of age, type of treatment, stability of NPM1 mutation, and co-occurring mutations on survival are the essential parameters for investigation. METHOD: Both the cases of AML were females, >60 years of age with normal 46XX karyotype. Allele specific RT-PCR and fragment analysis was performed for the detection of NPM1-A mutation at diagnosis. Both the patients were unfit for intensive chemotherapy therefore reduced intensity induction chemotherapy regimen was initially administered. Next-generation sequencing was performed for comprehensive mutational profiling, which guided targeted treatment, prognostic stratification, and response assessment. RESULT: We report that the older AML patients with NPM1 mutation may not have a good outcome with intensive chemotherapy, especially patients with concurrent DNMT3A/IDH-1/2 mutations. In the second case with mutated NPM1, concurrent FLT3-ITD mutation served as a therapeutic target. The FLT3 inhibitor used in combination with standard therapy showed promising results in this case. CONCLUSION: Here, we emphasize on the utility of next generation sequencing in guiding the treatment initiation or modulation during the disease course and risk stratification in AML. In conclusion, conventional chemotherapy in AML gives very poor overall survival rates and targeted chemotherapy against specific mutations may drastically improve patient survival and treatment outcomes.