Pregnancy and obstetric outcomes after fertility-sparing management of endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia: a multicentre cohort study.

STUDY QUESTION: What are the pregnancy and obstetric outcomes in women with atypical hyperplasia (AH) or early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) managed conservatively for fertility preservation? SUMMARY ANSWER: The study found a live birth rate of 62% in patients with AH or EC after conservative treatment, with higher level of labour induction, caesarean section, and post-partum haemorrhage. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Fertility-sparing treatment is a viable option for women with AH or EC during childbearing years, but the outcomes of such treatments, especially regarding pregnancy and obstetrics, need further exploration. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This retrospective cohort study analysed data from January 2010 to October 2022, involving 269 patients from the French national register of patients with fertility-sparing management of AH/EC. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Women above 18 years of age, previously diagnosed with AH/EC, and approved for fertility preservation were included. Patients were excluded if they were registered before 2010, if their treatment began <6 months before the study, or if no medical record on the pregnancy was available. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In total, 95 pregnancies in 67 women were observed. Pregnancy was achieved using ART in 63 cases (66%) and the live birth rate was 62%, with early and late pregnancy loss at 26% and 5%, respectively. In the 59 cases resulting in a live birth, a full-term delivery occurred in 90% of cases; 36% of cases required labour induction and 39% of cases required a caesarean section. The most common maternal complications included gestational diabetes (17%) and post-partum haemorrhaging (20%). The average (±SD) birthweight was 3110 ± 736 g; there were no significant foetal malformations in the sample. No significant difference was found in pregnancy or obstetric outcomes between ART-obtained and spontaneous pregnancies. However, the incidence of induction of labour, caesarean section, and post-partum haemorrhage appears higher than in the general population. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The retrospective nature of the study may introduce bias, and the sample size might be insufficient for assessing rare obstetric complications. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This study offers valuable insights for healthcare providers to guide patients who received fertility-sparing treatments for AH/EC. These pregnancies can be successful and with an acceptable live birth rate, but they seem to be managed with caution, leading to possible tendency for more caesarean sections and labour inductions. No increase in adverse obstetric outcomes was observed, with the exception of suspicion of a higher risk of post-partum haemorrhaging, to be confirmed. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No funding was received for this study. There are no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Sickle cell disease and COVID-19 in pregnant women.

INTRODUCTION: The effect of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) on pregnancy outcome in women with sickle cell disease (SCD) is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the severity of the SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnant women with SCD and its impact on pregnancy. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included SCD pregnant women tested positive for COVID-19 between March 2020 - February 2021. The primary endpoint was the severity of the COVID-19 infection. Secondary endpoints were pregnancy complications and fetal outcomes. RESULTS: During the study period among 82 pregnant women with SCD, 8 have presented symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 and were tested positive. A common mild clinical presentation was observed in 6 women (75%), one woman was asymptomatic and one required oxygen. The latter was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit and a cesarean section was performed in the context of an ongoing vaso-occlusive crisis and acute chest syndrome together with incidental preeclampsia. Labor was induced in another patient who developed a vaso-occlusive crisis after COVID-19 remission. Fetal outcomes were good with an average Apgar score of 10 and normal umbilical blood pH at birth. Two newborns were small-for-gestational-age as expected on the ultrasound follow-up before occurrence of COVID-19. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 infection in our population of pregnant women with SCD had typical presentation and rarely triggered a sickle cell crisis or other complications. Fetal outcomes were good and did not seem to be directly influenced by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Further studies are required to confirm these observations as compared to the population of women with SCD without COVID-19 infection.