Robot-Assisted Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Penile Cancer: An Indian Multicenter Experience.

Objective: To report outcomes of multicenter series of penile cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted video endoscopic inguinal lymph node dissection (RA-VEIL). Materials and Methods: In this retrospective analysis from 3 tertiary care centers in India, consecutive intermediate-/high-risk carcinoma penis (CaP) patients with nonpalpable inguinal lymphadenopathy and/or nonbulky (<3 cm) mobile inguinal lymphadenopathy undergoing RA-VEIL were included. Patients with matted/bulky (>3 cm) and fixed lymphadenopathy were excluded. Demographic, clinical, and intraoperative data were recorded. Perioperative complications were graded by the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC). The International Society of Lymphology (ISL) {0-III} grading was used for the assessment of lymphedema. Incidence and pattern of recurrences were assessed on follow-up. Results: From January 1, 2011, to September 30, 2023, 115 patients (230 groins) underwent bilateral RA-VEIL for CaP. The median age of the cohort was 60 (50-69) years. Clinically palpable (either unilateral or bilateral) inguinal lymphadenopathy was seen in 54 patients (47%). The "per groin" median operative time was 120 (100-140) minutes with median lymph node yield of 12 (9-16). No complications were recorded in 87.8% groins operated, with major complications (CDC 3) seen in 2.6% groins. At a median follow-up of 13.5 months, 13 patients had documented recurrences and there were 10 cancer-related deaths. No port-site recurrences were observed. No/minimal lymphedema (ISL 0/I) was seen in 94% legs. Conclusion: RA-VEIL demonstrates safety and oncologic efficacy in penile cancer patients presenting with clinically nonpalpable and/or nonbulky inguinal lymphadenopathy, with favorable functional outcomes.

Surgical and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy for upper-tract urothelial carcinoma: A single-center comparative analysis.

Introduction: We retrospectively compared surgical and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted (RA) radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in patients of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma with a cohort of patients who underwent the same procedure using a laparoscopic approach. Methods: Data of 63 consecutive patients who underwent RNU with bladder cuff excision (BCE) from 2011 to 2022 at a single tertiary care institution was retrospectively retrieved from the electronically maintained institutional database. Twenty-six cases underwent RNU with a laparoscopic approach, whereas 37 were done by RA approach. Demographic, clinical, surgical, and pathologic details and survival analyses were reported and compared. The tetrafecta of RNU, which include the performance of a BCE, lymphadenectomy, no positive surgical margin, and no major surgical complication, was also reviewed. Results: The mean age and body mass index of the robotic and laparoscopic groups were 61.5 years versus 62.7 years and 23.8 versus 24.9 kg/m2, respectively (P = 0.710 and 0.309). The Charlson Comorbidity Index and upper-tract tumor site distribution were comparable between the groups. There was no significant difference in the distribution of T stage, N stage, presence of multifocality, or lymphovascular invasion between the two groups. Although the rate of concomitant carcinoma in situ was higher in laparoscopic cohort, 42.8% versus 10.8% in robotic cohort (P = 0.004). The laparoscopic group had higher blood transfusion rates (50 vs. 13.5%, P = 0.002) and longer median hospital stays (7 vs. 4 days, P = 0.000). The median follow-up time was 21.5 versus 27 months in the laparoscopic and robotic groups. The RA group was significantly better in the achievement of the tetrafecta outcomes. The 5-year urinary bladder recurrence-free survival (UB RFS) and elsewhere RFS between the laparoscopic and robotic cohorts were 65% versus 72% and 56% versus 70%, respectively (P = 0.510 and 0.190). The laparoscopic cohort had worse 5-year cancer-specific survival and overall survival (64% vs. 90% and 58% vs. 74%, P = 0.04 and 0.08). Conclusion: The robotic approach to RNU and BCE has significantly lower transfusion rates, lower hospital stays, and significantly better cancer-specific survival rates.

Prostate cancer detection using magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy: A retrospective cohort study.

Introduction: Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided systematic prostate biopsy is conventionally used for the diagnosis of carcinoma prostate (CaP). However, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guided biopsies have been shown to have superior diagnostic performance. MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy improves the detection by combining the systematic and the targeted biopsies (TB). In this study, we evaluated the role of fusion biopsy in the detection of CaP as well as clinically significant carcinoma prostate (CsCaP). Methods: In this retrospective study, the patients who underwent fusion biopsy from January 2016 to July 2022 were evaluated. Patients underwent multiparametric MRI and the suspicious lesions were reported as per the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) version 2. The clinical, imaging, and biopsy parameters were recorded and evaluated. Results: A total of 330 patients with PIRADS ≥3 underwent MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy and prostate cancer was detected in 187 patients (56.67%). With an increase in the PIRADS score, there was a significant rise in the detection of CaP (P < 0.001) and CsCaP (P < 0.0000001). Prostatitis was observed in 13%-18.1% of the patients with a lesion on MRI irrespective of the PIRADS score. The systematic and TB were comparable for the detection of CaP (P = 0.88) and CsCaP (P = 0.26). With a prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) cutoff of 0.15 ng/mL/cc and 0.22 ng/mL/cc, biopsy could be safely avoided in 14.2% and 20.3% of the patients, missing only 0.3% of CaP and 0.9% of CsCaP, respectively. Different subgroups based on PSA levels, prostate volume, lesion dimension, and PIRADS score did not show a significant difference between the systematic and the targeted cores for the detection of CsCaP. Conclusion: This single center study of MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy shows that in men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer a pre-biopsy MRI and MRI-TRUS fusion combined systematic and targeted prostate biopsy improves the detection of prostate cancer and CsCaP. Patients with a PIRADS 3 lesion with a PSA density <0.22 can safely avoid prostate biopsy, without a significant risk of missing clinically significant prostate cancer.

Cutaneous Radiation-Associated Angiosarcoma After Treatment of Carcinoma Penis: First Report from Tertiary Cancer Centre of North India.

Cutaneous radiation-associated angiosarcoma (cRAA) is a rare and aggressive secondary cutaneous angiosarcoma (cAS) with poor survival. cRAA has been mostly reported in breast carcinoma patients. Owing to its rarity, there is scanty literature available and no treatment guidelines. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of cRAA after multimodality treatment of carcinoma penis. A sixty-eight-year-old gentleman, a known case of carcinoma penis, underwent total penectomy with perineal urethrostomy and bilateral radical inguinopelvic lymph node dissection 6 years ago. He received adjuvant radiotherapy to the pelvis and bilateral groin. He presented with a bleeding plaque-like lesion with ulceration over the left lower abdomen (within previous radiation field) which rapidly progressed in size over the past 2 months. On examination, the lesion bled profusely on touch. Contrast MRI was suggestive of lobulated exophytic enhancing cutaneous lesion free from underlying muscle. Wedge biopsy was suggestive of cutaneous angiosarcoma. He underwent wide local excision with local perforator flap reconstruction from the right lower abdomen. Histopathology was suggestive of cutaneous angiosarcoma which showed immunoexpression of CD31, ERG1, cMYC suggestive of cRAA. cRAA is a very aggressive disease with 5-year survival of 15-34%. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first ever reported case of cRAA of lower abdomen after multimodality management of carcinoma penis. It masquerades with other benign and less aggressive radiation-induced skin lesions. cMYC immunoexpression is specific for secondary cAS. Wide local resection with negative margin provides the best outcome.

Enzalutamide-Induced Acute Maculopapular Rash in Treatment of Metastatic Prostate Cancer: First Case Report from a Tertiary Cancer Care Center of North India.

Enzalutamide is a new potent inhibitor of the signaling pathway for the androgen receptor with a half-life of 5.8 days. It has been on the market for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer since November 2013. We report a case of acute generalized exanthematous maculopapular rash induced by enzalutamide. In summary, newer androgen receptor blockers have a propensity to cause skin related adverse effects. Most common among these are apalutamide. Enzalumatamide, per se, is a safe drug and has not been associated frequently in causing maculopapular rash. Few cases has been reported. In all these cases, the drug was discontinued and 2nd line therapy was instituted. In this report, Enzalutamide was withheld for 10 days and anti-histaminics was instituted. After a full recovery, Enzalutamide was reinstituted in treatment. A 62-year-old male patient with no significant medical history, was diagnosed in March 2020 with metastatic prostatic adenocarcinoma. Baseline PSA was 456 ng/ml. PSMA PET scan showed evidence of multiple bony metastasis. He was started on Degarelix subcutaneous injection with oral abiraterone initially. PSA level showed initial decreasing trend till September 2021 followed by sudden increase. Intramuscular Injection leuprolide was started and initial responses were good followed by later rise of PSA from January. Tab Xtandi (Enzalutamide) was added to the regimen from 31.1.22. Three days after starting enzalutamide treatment, the patient experienced an acute skin reaction. It is about of the plaques covered with widespread millimetric non-follicular papules. Enzalutamide was stopped after appearance of rashes to avoid further serious adverse effects. Anti-histaminics were started. Complete resolution of skin lesions occurred within 10 days. Tab Enzalutamide was reinstituted on 11th day after stoppage and on complete resolution of skin resolutions. According to the CTCAE 5.0 criteria, these skin rash was graded as grade 2. In view of evidence in literature and clinical improvement after stoppage, the acute drug reaction was attributed to enzalutamide. Uro oncologist can be confronted with adverse skin drug reactions attributable to new therapeutic molecules. The slow resolution of symptoms seems be due to the long half-life of enzalutamide. It should not be withdrawn from therapy owing to these effects. Rather, it should be with stopped for 10-14 days. Basic treatment with anti-histaminics or topical steroids may be enough to warranty the resolution of symptoms, and the drug (Enzalutamide) can be continued thereafter.

Robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for post-chemotherapy residual mass in testicular cancer: Long-term experience from a tertiary care centre.

Objectives: To present our intermediate to long-term oncological and functional outcomes of robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RA-RPLND) in post-chemotherapy (PC) residual mass in testicular cancers. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest single-centre experience of RA-RPLND for in such setting. Methods: Prospectively maintained database of carcinoma testis patients undergoing RA-RPLND from February 2012 to September 2021 was reviewed. Patient demographics, tumour stage and risk groups and chemotherapy details were recorded. Intraoperative details and post-operative complications were also noted. Pathological outcomes included were lymph node yield and histopathology report. Further, follow-up was done for recurrence and antegrade ejaculation status. Results: Total of 37 cases were done for PC residual masses. International germ cell cancer collaborative group good, intermediate and poor risk proportion was 18 (48.6%), 14 (37.8%) and 5 (13.5%), respectively. Bilateral full template dissection, unilateral modified template dissection and residual mass excision was performed in 59.5% (22/37), 35.1% (13/37) and 5.4% (2/37) patients, respectively. The median size of the excised residual mass was 3.45 cm interquartile range (IQR 2-6 cm), with the largest being 9 cm. The median lymph nodal yield was 19. The most common histology was necrosis (n = 24, 65%), followed by teratoma (n = 11, 30%) and viable malignancy (n = 2, 5%). Antegrade ejaculation was reported in 32 patients (86.4%). After a median follow-up of 41 (IQR 14-64) months, only one patient had a recurrence. Conclusions: RA-PC-RPLND is thus a safe, feasible and oncologically effective option for selected patients. With increasing experience, larger masses can also be dealt with efficiently.

Robotic re-exploration for post-operative in house complications following robotic pelvic uro-oncologic surgery: Initial experience, tips and tricks.

Purpose: Despite widespread acceptance of robotics in urology, literature on using the minimally invasive approach for management of post robotic surgical complications is limited. Here we describe our experience with tips and tricks for robotic re-exploration of post-operative in house complications following robotic pelvic uro-oncologic surgery. Methods: A retrospective query of prospectively maintained database was done for all patients who underwent robotic - radical cystoprostatectomy (RCP, 437 patients) and radical prostatectomy (RP, 649 patients), from Jan 2015 or March 2021. Clinical details were collected for all who underwent a second robotic procedure during the same hospital admission for any complication related to the primary surgery. Results: Following RCP, 5 patients were re-explored for intestinal obstruction. Surgery was successfully completed in all with a median console time of 80 minutes. Median time to the passage of flatus and discharge from hospital following relook surgery was 3 and 6 days, respectively. Following RP, 3 patients underwent robotic re-exploration (two for reactionary hemorrhage, one for rectal injury). All three cases were managed with a median console time of 75 minutes. Robotic re-exploration was accomplished without extending the skin incision of the index surgery and we did not find an increased incidence of infectious or wound related complications. Conclusion: Robotic re-exploration for select post robotic urologic pelvic oncology surgery complications in the immediate and early post-operative period is feasible in the hands of experienced surgeons. Our experience can help others adopt robotics in such scenarios.

Perineal urethrostomy: A single-stage viable option for complex anterior urethral strictures.

INTRODUCTION: Perineal urethrostomy (PU) is a valid single stage option with maximum success to manage complex anterior urethral strictures. AIMS: To evaluate the functional outcome of permanent PU using the Blandy technique in older patients or PU with staged reconstruction in young patients with severely diseased distal urethra. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of 124 patients. They underwent Blandy's PU with or without Johanson stage 1. Exclusion criteria included patients with posterior urethral strictures or bladder neck contractures. RESULTS: Mean age of patients was 54 years. Strictures due to catheterisation or instrumentation were most common - 85 (68.54%). Out of 124 patients, 71(57.3%) of them were posted for PU with Johanson stage 1 and 53 for PU only (42.7%) according to patients' choice. In patients age below 50 years, PU (N=10), PU with Johanson stage 1 (N=40) and Johanson stage 2 (N= 8) patients had mean Qmax of 20.2ml/s (17-24), 20.7ml/s (16-26), 16.375ml/s (14-18) respectively. In patients age> 50 years, PU (N=43), PU with Johanson stage 1 (N=31) and Johanson stage 2 (N= 4) patients had mean Qmax of 16.41ml/s (11-24), 17.25ml/s (11-25) and14.75 ml/s (12-17) respectively.For patients with only PU, 8/53 patients (15.09%) required secondary intervention (stomal dilatation N=6 and TURP N=2) while in PU with Johanson stage 1 patients, 10/71(14.08%) required secondary intervention (Stomal dilatation N=6, 8.45% and TURP N= 4, 5.6%). 112/124 (90.32%) were considered successful. CONCLUSION: Since most of patients have suffered for years, PU provides results in one stage.