The effect of the systemic immune-inflammatory index on the no-reflow phenomenon in patients undergoing saphenous vein intervention.

Introduction: The systemic immune inflammation index (SII), based on lymphocyte, neutrophil, and platelet counts, has been shown to be an independent indicator of no-reflow phenomenon during percutaneous intervention. However, the relationship between SII and no-reflow phenomenon (NRP) that develops after the procedure of saphenous vein grafts is unknown. Aim: In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between no-reflow phenomenon and SII during percutaneous intervention on saphenous vein grafts. Material and methods: A total of 133 patients who underwent percutaneous intervention for saphenous vein grafts due to acute coronary syndrome between 2019 and 2022 were included in this study. The receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to determine the cut-off value of SII to predict the no-reflow. The multivariate regression was used to analyse the correlation between no-reflow and SII. Results: The median value of SII was significantly higher in patients with no-reflow in comparison with normal reperfusion (543 (447, 717) vs. 861 (642, 1272), p < 0.001). The optimal threshold for SII in predicting the no-reflow phenomenon was 613, with sensitivity and specificity of 84% and 66%, respectively. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.73-0.89, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, SII ≥ 613 showed an independent predictive value for the no-reflow (OR = 4.02, 95% CI: 1.40-11.57, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our results showed that high SII levels were independently associated with the development of no-reflow phenomenon in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and undergoing percutaneous intervention to the SVG.

The Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index Predicts Impaired Myocardial Perfusion and Short-Term Mortality in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients.

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the utility of the immune-inflammation index (SII) in estimating the no-reflow phenomenon and short-term cardiovascular prognosis in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). 723 consecutive patients with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were enrolled in our study. The receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to determine the cut-off value of SII to predict the no-reflow. The multivariate regression analysis analyzed the correlation between no-reflow and SII. The median value of SII was significantly higher in patients with no-reflow in comparison with normal reperfusion [1466 (939-2409) vs 905 (566-1379), p < .001]. The optimal threshold for SII in predicting the no-reflow phenomenon was 1036, with sensitivity and specificity of 70% and 59%, respectively. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.66-0.75, p < .001). In multivariate analysis, SII ≥ 1036 value showed an independent predictive value for the no-reflow (OR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.29-0.92, p = .02) and the 30-day cardiovascular mortality (OR = 2.37, 95% CI: 1.34-4.19, p = .003). Our results suggest that higher SII levels are independently associated with the no-reflow phenomenon and 30-day mortality in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI.

Efficacy of Transpedal Retrograde Approach in Endovascular Treatment of Patients With Buerger's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment of Buerger's disease is challenging, which usually impedes antegrade revascularization options. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of transpedal retrograde approach in patients with Buerger's disease with ambiguous proximal caps and/or previously failed endovascular intervention via antegrade approach. METHODS: Eighteen patients with the diagnosis of Buerger's disease who had previously failed antegrade endovascular interventions and/or ambiguous proximal caps were enrolled. Baseline demographic characteristics, severity of critical limb-threatening ischemia, wound scores, postprocedural pedal loop scores, and recovery or amputation rates were recorded. RESULTS: The patients presented with ischemic rest pain (n = 5, Rutherford stage 4), ischemic ulcers with minor tissue loss (n = 8, Rutherford stage 5), and severe ischemic ulcers or gangrene with major tissue loss (n = 5, Rutherford stage 6). Preprocedural wound score according to Saint Elian Wound Score System (SEWSS) was 15.72 ± 5.05. Retrograde transpedal puncture was achieved with an 89% success rate. Postintervention angiographic success rate was 100%. Postintervention Rutherford stage improved compared with preprocedural Rutherford stages (P<.01). In addition, the average SEWSS score decreased significantly after the interventions (P<.001). Postprocedural pedal loop score was found to be associated with SEWSS scores and amputation rates. CONCLUSIONS: Transpedal retrograde approach is a technically feasible and potentially effective treatment modality for Buerger's disease and may be considered as a first-line treatment option in the treatment of limb salvage, especially when proximal caps of target vessels are ambiguous or antegrade approach is unsuccessful.

Effects of statin response on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of statin response on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. METHODS: A total of 1029 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients were enrolled in the study. The patients who failed to achieve >40% reduction in baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels within 30 days to 12 months after statin initiation were defined as suboptimal statin responders. The adjusted hazard ratios for cardiovascular outcomes for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol response to statins were estimated via the Cox proportional regression model. The relationship between the statin response and cardiovascular outcomes was also evaluated in a subgroup of on-treatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels below 55 mg/dL. RESULTS: Among the study population, 573 (55.6%) patients demonstrated suboptimal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol response to statin therapy. These patients showed a significantly higher incidence of the composite of major adverse cardiovascular events, including cardiovascular death, reinfarction, recurrent myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization during the follow-up compared with optimal responders (adjusted hazard ratios 3.99; 95%CI 2.66-6.01; p<0.001). In a subgroup of patients with on-treatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels below 55 mg/dL, suboptimal statin responders also showed unfavorable cardiovascular outcomes (adjusted hazard ratios 8.73; 95%CI 2.81-27.1; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that over half of the patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction did not exhibit optimal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol response to statin. These patients have an increased risk of future major adverse cardiovascular events.

Effects of statin response on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of statin response on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. METHODS: A total of 1029 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients were enrolled in the study. The patients who failed to achieve >40% reduction in baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels within 30 days to 12 months after statin initiation were defined as suboptimal statin responders. The adjusted hazard ratios for cardiovascular outcomes for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol response to statins were estimated via the Cox proportional regression model. The relationship between the statin response and cardiovascular outcomes was also evaluated in a subgroup of on-treatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels below 55 mg/dL. RESULTS: Among the study population, 573 (55.6%) patients demonstrated suboptimal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol response to statin therapy. These patients showed a significantly higher incidence of the composite of major adverse cardiovascular events, including cardiovascular death, reinfarction, recurrent myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization during the follow-up compared with optimal responders (adjusted hazard ratios 3.99; 95%CI 2.66-6.01; p<0.001). In a subgroup of patients with on-treatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels below 55 mg/dL, suboptimal statin responders also showed unfavorable cardiovascular outcomes (adjusted hazard ratios 8.73; 95%CI 2.81-27.1; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that over half of the patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction did not exhibit optimal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol response to statin. These patients have an increased risk of future major adverse cardiovascular events.

Cardio-ankle vascular index represents the best surrogate for 10-year ASCVD risk estimation in patients with primary hypertension.

Background: Identification of target organ damage and/or risk-enhancing factors help treatment decisions in hypertensive and hyperlipidaemic patients who reside in borderline to an intermediate risk category based on 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk estimates.Aim: In the present study, we aimed to investigate the comparative efficacy of certain hypertension-mediated organ damage markers (HMOD) for the prediction of 10-year ASCVD risk ≥10%, in patients with primary hypertension without established CVD.Methods: One-hundred thirty-seven asymptomatic hypertensive patients ≥40 years of age were enrolled in the present study. Ten-year ASCVD risks were estimated by Pooled Cohort Equations. The following HMOD markers; pulse pressure (PP), left ventricular mass index (LVMI), carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), ankle-brachial index (ABI), cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were evaluated with respect to efficacy for predicting ≥10% ASCVD risk with ROC analysis.Results: CAVI gave the greatest Area Under Curve (AUC = 0.736, p < .000), and followed by CIMT (AUC = 0.727, p < .000), LVMI (AUC = O.630, p = .01), and PP (AUC = 0.623, p = .02). ABI and eGFR were not found to be predictive. CAVI correlated best with estimated 10-year ASCVD risk (r = 0.460, p < .000). A CAVI value ≥8 was found 71% sensitive and 72% specific for predicting ≥10% risk in 10-year ASCVD risk scale. CAVI gave the best graded response to increments in 10-year ASCVD risk categories.Conclusion: We suggest that CAVI is the best surrogate for 10-year ASCVD risk, among several HMOD markers.

Is endocan a biochemical marker for asymptomatic target organ damage in hypertensive patients?

OBJECTIVE: Identification of the asymptomatic target organ damage (AOD) helps to stratify the overall risk of cardiovascular (CV) diseases and guides a treatment decision in hypertensive patients without a symptomatic CV or renal disease. The endothelial-cell-specific molecule 1 (endocan) is regarded as a novel marker of endothelial dysfunction. Its release is increased in hypertensive patients, especially those with symptomatic CV and renal disease. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the endocan levels in asymptomatic hypertensive patients with or without AOD. METHODS: The study included 132 asymptomatic hypertensive patients, and 101 of who had at least one AOD. RESULTS: Serum endocan levels did not differ between patients with and without AOD (3.81±0.78 vs. 3.83±0.63 ng/mL, p=0.88). An analysis according to the presence of any specific AOD did not show any difference between groups. No significant correlation was found between serum endocan levels and any of the continuous variables related to AOD, such as the pulse pressure, carotid intimae-media thickness, cardio-ankle vascular index, ankle-brachial index, left ventricular mass index, Sokolow-Lyon index, Cornell voltage-duration product, and estimated glomerular filtration rate. CONCLUSION: Endocan may not serve as a useful biomarker at asymptomatic vascular stages of hypertension, despite its role in indicating disease severity and inflammatory activation in advanced symptomatic CV and renal disease.

Impact of direct stenting on clinical outcomes for small vessel coronary artery disease in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

INTRODUCTION: Direct stenting (DS) is associated with improved markers of reperfusion during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, data evaluating its impact in small vessel coronary artery disease (CAD) are lacking. AIM: To compare DS and conventional stenting (CS) for small vessel CAD on clinical outcomes of patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cohort of 616 STEMI patients treated with DS (202 patients) or CS (414 patients) in small vessel (≤ 2.75 mm) lesions was retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was to compare the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) between groups during 2-year follow-up. The secondary end points included in-hospital target lesion revascularization (TLR) and in-hospital death. RESULTS: The primary end-point, MACEs, occurred in 9.2% in the DS group and 12.3% in the CS group (p > 0.05). The rates of TLR, myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) were not significantly different between groups (p > 0.05). The stent thrombosis (ST) rate was significantly lower in the DS group (1.0% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.04) at 2 years. However, DS was not found to be an independent predictor of ST in multivariate analysis. There were no significant differences in in-hospital rates of death and TLR. The DS compared to CS resulted in greater rates of postprocedural TIMI grade 3 flow, and lower risk of edge dissection. The procedure time, radiation exposure and contrast administration were found to be significantly lower in the DS group. CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI for small vessel CAD, DS is not only safe and feasible but also reduces ST rates, contrast load, and procedural and radiation exposure time.

Relationship of salusin-alpha and salusin-beta levels with atherosclerosis in patients undergoing haemodialysis.

INTRODUCTION: In patients undergoing haemodialysis, cardiovascular mortality and morbidity, characterised by accelerated atherosclerosis and increased inflammation, are elevated. Salusins are newly defined molecules in the atherosclerotic processes, and while salusin-alpha (Sal-α) acts as an antiatherogenic factor, salusin-beta (Sal-ß) has a proatherogenic role. Their roles are as yet undefined in patients undergoing haemodialysis. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, salusin levels, carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) from the common carotid artery and pulse wave velocity (PWV) were measured for 180 patients undergoing haemodialysis and 90 healthy controls. RESULTS: Mean Sal-α and Sal-ß levels in patients undergoing haemodialysis (Sal-α: 726.4 ± 578.7 pg/mL; Sal-ß: 1,080.4 ± 757.1 pg/mL) and healthy controls (Sal-α: 325.8 ± 303.7 pg/mL; Sal-ß: 268.1 ± 409.0 pg/mL) were determined. Negative correlation was observed between Sal-α levels and CIMT (patients undergoing haemodialysis: r = -0.330, p < 0.0001; healthy controls: r = -0.223, p = 0.035) and PWV (patients undergoing haemodialysis: r = -0.210, p = 0.005; healthy controls: r = -0.378, p < 0.0001) in both groups. In patients undergoing haemodialysis, positive correlation was observed between Sal-ß/Sal-α ratio and CIMT (r = 0.190, p = 0.012) and PWV (r = 0.155, p = 0.041). On subgroup analysis, Sal-α levels were found to be low in patients with diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing haemodialysis have higher Sal-ß and Sal-α levels, and their higher Sal-ß/Sal-α ratio, in comparison with healthy controls, might have cardiovascular risk implications.

Use of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio for risk stratification and relationship with time in therapeutic range in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is one of the most common abnormal heart rhythms. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has emerged as a potential marker for the level of inflammation in cardiac disorders. HYPOTHESIS: NLR might be associated with thrombosis and bleeding risk scores and might predict cardioembolic risk in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients within the therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR). METHODS: We enrolled 272 patients taking warfarin for NVAF and classified them into 2 groups: Group A consisted of patients (n = 132) whose time in therapeutic range (TTR) was ≥65%, and Group B comprised patients (n = 139) whose TTR was <65%. RESULTS: NLR values were higher in group B than in group A (P < 0.0001). Patients classified as high risk according to CHA2 DS2 -VASc score had significantly higher NLR levels (P = 0.002) than those classified as low and intermediate risk. Furthermore, NLR levels were significantly correlated with CHA2 DS2 -VASc and HAS-BLED scores (P < 0.001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). NLR predicted patients within therapeutic INR range (TTR ≥65%) with sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 71% in a receiver operator characteristic curve analysis, using a cutoff value of 2.17. Area under the curve for NLR was 0.81 (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study showing correlation of NLR with both CHA2 DS2 -VASc and HAS-BLED risk scores. NLR might represent a useful marker to identify patients with high risks of stroke and bleeding and may have predictive value in identifying patients within the therapeutic INR range.

Comparison of closed-cell and hybrid-cell stent designs in carotid artery stenting: clinical and procedural outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is a promising alternative to surgery in high-risk patients. However, the impact of stent cell design on outcomes in CAS is a matter of continued debate. AIM: To compare the periprocedural and clinical outcomes of different stent designs for CAS with distal protection devices. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All CAS procedures with both closed- and hybrid-cell stents performed at our institution between February 2010 and December 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. Adverse events were defined as death, major stroke, minor stroke, transient ischemic attack and myocardial infarction. Periprocedural and 30-day adverse events and internal carotid artery (ICA) vasospasm rates were compared between the closed-cell and hybrid-cell stent groups. RESULTS: The study included 234 patients comprising 146 patients with a closed-cell stent (Xact stent, Abbott Vascular) (mean age: 68.5 ±8.6; 67.1% male) and 88 patients with a hybrid-cell stent (Cristallo Ideale, Medtronic) (mean age: 67.2 ±12.8; 68.2% male). There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to periprocedural or 30-day adverse event rates. While there was no difference in terms of tortuosity index between the groups, there was a higher procedural ICA vasospasm rate in the closed-cell stent group (35 patients, 23%) compared with the hybrid-cell stent group (10 patients, 11%) (p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study showed no significant difference in the clinical adverse event rates after CAS between the closed-cell stent group and the hybrid-cell stent group. However, procedural ICA vasospasm was more common in the closed-cell stent group.

Does Vitamin D Deficiency Effect Heart Rate Variability in Low Cardiovascular Risk Population?

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the cardiac autonomic dysfunction and the cardiac arrhythmia risk using heart rate variability parameters in subjects with vitamin D deficiency and low cardiovascular risk. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred five consecutive individuals, 54 patients with low vitamin D status and 51 healthy controls were enrolled in this study. The overall cardiac autonomic tone was quantified by using various heart rate variability parameters included mean RR interval, mean Heart Rate, mean of standard deviations of intervals for 24 hours (SDNN), standard deviation of averages of intervals (SDANN), mean of standard deviation of intervals for 5 minutes (SDNNI), root mean square of difference of successive intervals (rMSSD) and the proportion of intervals differing more than 50 ms (pNN50) values. The 12-lead ECG was recorded from each participant, and QT intervals were measured. RESULTS: Baseline demographic profiles were similar between two groups. The heart rate variability parameters such as mean RR interval, mean HR, SDNN, SDANN, SDNNI, rMSSD and pNN50 (%) values were not significantly different in patients with low vitamin D status compared to control group. The electrocardiography analysis revealed only slight but significant prolongation of corrected QT (QTc) intervals in the control group. CONCLUSION: HRV variables were not significantly altered in patients with vitamin D deficiency in low cardiovascular risk profile group. Further studies evaluating these findings in other cohorts with high cardiovascular risk are required.

Left ventricular twist was decreased in isolated left bundle branch block with preserved ejection fraction.

OBJECTIVE: Left ventricular (LV) rotation and twist play an important role in LV contraction and relaxation. Left bundle branch block (LBBB) deteriorates both diastolic and systolic functions. We evaluated the LV twist in patients with LBBB and preserved ejection fraction (EF) (>50%) to determine twist as a potential marker for subtle myocardial dysfunction. METHODS: This observational cross-sectional study included 34 LBBB patients with preserved EF who were free from ischemic and valvular disease (Group 1) and 36 healthy controls (Group 2). All patients underwent 2-D Doppler and 2-D speckle tracking echocardiography. LV apical, basal rotation, and twist were evaluated in both groups and compared accordingly. In addition, subjects were dichotomized considering the median twist value of the study population. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the independent variables associated with inframedian twist. RESULTS: Baseline clinical characteristics were similar in LBBB patients and controls. Mean apical rotation (2.5°±1.9° vs. 4.4°±2.9°; p=0.002), basal rotation (-2.9°±2.3° vs. -4.1°±2.7°; p=0.05), and twist (5.4°±3° vs. 8.6°±3.3°; p<0.001) were decreased in group 1. Parameters related to intra- and interventricular mechanical dyssynchrony, such as longitudinal left ventricular dyssynchrony index (LVdys) and preejection interval of LV, interventricular mechanical delay (IVMD), and left posterior wall contractions (SPMWD) were significantly higher in the LBBB group. The median twist value of the studied population was 6.65°. Binary logistic regression analysis showed that only presence of LBBB was independently associated with inframedian twist (OR=6.250; 95% CI: 2.215-17.632; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The LBBB might have induced the reduction of LV twist by diminishing the LV rotation before inducing a prominent effect on the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Therefore, twist may be considered as a marker for subtle LV dysfunction in LBBB with substantially normal EF.

Predictors of periprocedural complications of carotid artery stenting - a multivariate analysis of a single-centre experience.

BACKGROUND: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is currently used as an alternative treatment to carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The objective of this study was to analyse our 5-year experience performing CAS. Secondarily, we sought to determine independent risk factors which predict periprocedural complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 146 patients who underwent 153 CAS procedures were analysed. The majority of patients (123, 84.2%) had symptomatic carotid stenosis. Demographic and interventional data, angiographic lesion characteristics, and periprocedural complications were recorded. Using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, risk factors associated with adverse clinical outcomes were determined. RESULTS: Periprocedural neurological complications, including four (2.7 %) major strokes, three (2 %) transient ischaemic attacks, one (0.7%) amaurosis fugax, and two (1.3 %) cases of hyperperfusion syndrome occurred in ten (6.8%) patients. The incidence of periprocedural complications significantly increased in female patients (r = 0.214, p = 0.009) and patients with longer lesions (r = 0.183, p = 0.027), contralateral stenosis ≥50 % (r = 0.222, p = 0.007), the presence of complicated plaques (r = 0.478, p < 0.001) and inadequate glycaemic control (r = 0.259, p = 0.002). Multivariate regression analysis also determined four variables to be potential independent risk factors for 30-day adverse events: higher age (Odds ratio [OR] = 1.283; 95 % CI, 1.051 to 1.566, p = 0.014); longer lesions (OR = 1.459, 95 % CI, 1.124 to 1.893, p = 0.004); higher tortuosity index (OR = 1.015, 95 % CI, 1.001 to 1.030, p = 0.034), and the presence of complicated plaque morphology (OR = 4.321, 95 % CI, 1.621 to 10.23, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patient and lesion characteristics including age, lesion length, complicated plaque morphology and tortuosity index, may be associated with periprocedural complications.

Usefulness of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in predicting the severity of carotid artery stenosis in patients undergoing carotid angiography.

Carotid artery stenosis (CAS) is primarily caused by atherosclerotic plaque. Progressive inflammation may contribute to the rupture of an atherosclerotic plaque. The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) is a new and simple marker that indicates inflammation. In this study, we aimed to investigate the use of the PLR to determine the severity of CAS. One hundred forty patients were chosen from among patients who underwent carotid angiography in our institution. Symptomatic patients with stenosis >50% in the carotid arteries and asymptomatic patients with stenosis >80% were diagnosed via carotid angiography as having critical stenosis. Patients were classified into two groups. Group 1 included patients who had critical CAS, whereas Group 2 included patients with noncritical CAS, as determined by carotid angiography. Correlations between the PLR and the severity of CAS were analyzed. There were no significant differences in sex and age between the two groups. The PLR was 162.5 ± 84.7 in the noncritical CAS group patients and 94.9 ± 60.3 in the critical CAS group patients (p < 0.0001). The PLR value of 117.1 had 89% sensitivity and 68% specificity for CAS [95% confidence interval, 0.043-0.159; area under the curve, 0.101 ± 0.03)]. In this study, we have shown that PLR values may be associated with critical stenosis in at least one of the carotid arteries. Furthermore, PLR values may be used to predict critical stenosis in the carotid arteries.