Randomized, double-blind, two-way crossover bioequivalence and adhesion study, in healthy women, of a transdermal contraceptive patch with a newly sourced adhesive component at the end of shelf life vs. the EVRA patch at the beginning of shelf life.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate bioequivalence, based on norelgestromin (NGMN) and ethinyl estradiol (EE) plasma concentrations, and adhesion of a transdermal contraceptive patch containing a newly sourced adhesive component (test) at end of shelf life (EOSL) vs. the marketed EVRA patch (reference) at beginning of shelf life (BOSL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, two-way crossover study, healthy women received a single, 7-day application of test and reference patches in 4 sequences: two 11-day treatment periods separated by a 21-day washout. Assessments included NGMN and EE pharmacokinetics (PK), adhesion (per European Medicines Agency (EMA) 5-point scale), irritation potential and application-site reactions, and tolerability. Patches were bioequivalent if 90% CIs of geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of test/reference for Cmax, AUC168h, AUC0-tlast, and AUC∞ were 80 - 125%. Patch adhesion was comparable if ratios of geometric mean cumulative adhesion percentages were ≥ 90%. RESULTS: 68 women were randomized, and 62 completed both treatments. 55 and 59 participants in the reference and test group, respectively, had patch adhesion ≥ 80% (EMA score 0 - 1) at end of treatment. Bioequivalence was demonstrated: GMRs for pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters ranged from 102.76 - 105.57% for NGMN and 93.78 - 94.80% for EE, and associated 90% CIs were fully within the bioequivalence acceptance range (80 - 125%) for both. The patches had comparable adhesion properties (GMR, 101.4% (90% CI: 99.2 - 103.6)) and incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events. CONCLUSION: NGMN-EE transdermal test patch at EOSL was bioequivalent to the marketed patch at BOSL, supporting widening the product's shelf-life specification. Adhesive properties and safety profiles were comparable between patches.

Comparison of a transdermal contraceptive patch with a newly sourced adhesive component versus EVRA patch: A double-blind, randomized, bioequivalence and adhesion study in healthy women.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the bioequivalence of norelgestromin and ethinyl estradiol (NGMN-EE) and adhesion of a transdermal contraceptive patch containing a newly sourced adhesive component (test) compared with the marketed (reference) patch. STUDY DESIGN: In this randomized, double-blind, 2-way crossover study, healthy women received single 7-day application of both test and reference patches. Treatment phase included two treatment periods of 11 days each separated by a 21-day washout period starting from day of patch removal (day 8) of treatment period 1. Assessments included NGMN and EE pharmacokinetics (PK), adhesion using European Medicines Agency (EMA) 5-point scale, irritation potential and application-site reactions, and safety. Patches were bioequivalent if 90% CIs of ratios of means of test/reference for AUC168h, AUCinf, and Css fell within 80-125%. Patch adhesion was comparable if ratios of mean cumulative adhesion percentage values of test/reference were ≥90.0%. RESULTS: Seventy women were randomized; 57 completed both treatments with ≥80% adhesion (score 0-1). Bioequivalence of test and reference patches was demonstrated as 90% CI of ratio of geometric means for AUC168h, AUCinf, and Css for NGMN and EE fell within 80-125%. Both patches had similar adhesion properties (geometric mean ratio was 100.3% [90% CI, 93.2-107.9]). Similar rates of mild-to-moderate itching (11% vs 10%) and erythema events (79% vs 74%) were reported for test and reference patches, respectively, on day 8. CONCLUSIONS: The test patch with the newly sourced adhesive component is bioequivalent to the currently marketed NGMN-EE transdermal patch and has similar adhesion and irritation potential. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: The norelgestromin and ethinyl estradiol transdermal patch containing a newly sourced adhesive component is bioequivalent to the currently marketed patch for both active moieties. Both patches had similar adhesion, irritation potential, and safety profiles.

Tramadol Hydrochloride at Steady State Lacks Clinically Relevant QTc Interval Increases in Healthy Adults.

We evaluated the effects of therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses of tramadol hydrochloride on the corrected QT (QTc) interval in healthy adults (aged 18-55 years) in a randomized, phase I, double-blind, placebo- and positive-controlled, multiple-dose, 4-way crossover study. Participants were randomized to receive 1 of 4 treatments (A-D), 1 each in 4 treatment periods (1-4), separated by a washout period (7-15 days). Treatment A comprised tramadol 400 mg (therapeutic dose) on days 1 through 3, tramadol 100 mg and moxifloxacin-matched placebo on day 4, and placebo on all 4 days. Treatment B comprised tramadol 600 mg (supratherapeutic dose) on days 1 through 3, and tramadol 150 mg and moxifloxacin-matched placebo on day 4. Treatment C comprised placebo on days 1 through 4 and moxifloxacin-matched placebo on day 4. Treatment D comprised placebo on days 1 through 4 and moxifloxacin 400 mg on day 4. Of 68 participants enrolled, 57 (83.8%) completed the study. Both therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses of tramadol were shown to be noninferior to placebo regarding their effect on QTc prolongation. Sixty-one of 68 (89.7%) participants reported at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (mild); nausea was the most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse event. Summarizing, tramadol at doses up to 600 mg/day did not cause clinically relevant QTc interval prolongation in healthy adults.