A Model of Community Health Worker Integration into Schools: Community-based Participatory Research in Action.

BACKGROUND: Schools are rich sites for collaborations between health and educational sectors. OBJECTIVES: To identify lessons learned from formation of a community-academic partnership and application of community-based participatory research (CBPR) to develop a model that integrates community health workers into schools. METHODS: Individuals from an academic medical center, a large public school district, and a community-based research institute applied CBPR principles to reimagine schools as a place for improving the health of children. LESSONS LEARNED: Three lessons emerged. Leveraging each team member's expertise centered the partnership on community strengths, co-learning, and stakeholder engagement. Adherence to CBPR's principles of power sharing and equity helped navigate the challenges of collaboration between large institutions. Early focus on sustainability helped address unexpected issues, build capacity, and boost advocacy. CONCLUSIONS: This partnership demonstrates how CBPR fosters conditions in which equitable partnerships between research institutions and public schools can thrive to promote childhood health.

A Multisite Survey of Pediatric Hospitalists' Practices in Soliciting Feedback From Trainees.

OBJECTIVE: There is evidence that pediatric attending physicians value receiving feedback from trainees. With this study, we sought to determine the extent to which pediatric hospitalists value, solicit, and receive feedback from residents and medical students on specific areas of the attending's performance and identify perceived barriers to trainees' providing feedback. METHODS: A web-based survey was sent to pediatric hospitalists at 9 institutions in 2022. Survey questions were developed from existing literature, trainee input, faculty expertise, and a framework on the qualities of exemplary pediatric educators. Respondents answered yes-no and multiitem Likert scale questions and selected answers from predetermined lists related to feedback solicitation from trainees. χ-Square and Wilcoxon rank test statistics were used to analyze questions. RESULTS: Responses were gathered from 91 of 189 surveyed individuals (response rate: 48.1%). Respondents almost unanimously "agreed" or "strongly agreed" that feedback from medical students (88, 96.7%) and residents (89, 97.8%) can be valuable, but feedback was considered more valuable from residents (P <.05). Attending physicians asked for and received feedback more from residents than from medical students (P <.05). Attending physicians most commonly asked for feedback on "teaching skills." The largest perceived barriers to receiving feedback from trainees were trainee lacking comfort with giving feedback, trainee lacking awareness that providing feedback is within their role, and fear of retaliation. CONCLUSIONS: Although pediatric hospitalist respondents nearly unanimously valued feedback from trainees, attending physicians were inconsistent in their feedback solicitation practices. Attending physicians were more likely to ask for and receive feedback from residents than from medical students.