Allograft nephrectomy: what is the best surgical technique?

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate differences in outcomes of allograft nephrectomies performed by extracapsular versus intracapsular techniques. METHODS: From 1993 to 2010, we performed 89 allograft nephrectomies, including 57 by extracapsular techniques and 32 by intracapsular, chosen according to feasibility at the beginning of the surgery. Fisher exact test and logistic regression were used for statistical analysis. Survival estimates after allograft nephrectomy were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: After a mean graft survival of 49.7 months, the indications for transplant nephrectomy were chronic rejection (39.3%), acute rejection (22.5%), infection/sepsis (19.1%), gross hematuria (6.7%), renal vein thrombosis (6.7%), renal artery thrombosis (3.4%), and graft rupture (2.3%). Mean operative time, blood loss, transfusions, and complications were similar between the extracapsular and intracapsular groups. The only difference in surgical aspects between the 2 groups was the mean hospital stay, which was longer for the extracapsular group (13.8 vs 7.6 days; P = .01), a result that was confirmed by multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.1; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Our experience showed no significant advantages in favor of the intracapsular technique except for a shorter length of hospital stay than after the extracapsular procedure.

Extended criteria donor kidney transplantation: comparative outcome analysis between single versus double kidney transplantation at 5 years.

INTRODUCTION: Dual kidney transplantation (DKT), using extended criteria donor (ECD) grafts not suitable for single kidney transplantation (SKT), has been suggested to expand the kidney donor pool. Herein, we reviewed the long-term outcomes of DKT to assess its results versus a control group of 179 ECD SKTs. The allocation policy was based on a Remuzzi score obtained from a pretransplant biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed SKT in 179 (31.8%) and DKT in 41 (7.3%) of 563 cadaveric transplants from 2000 to 2008. Patients with DKT versus SKT showed mean recipient ages of 54 versus 51 years. We performed 17 ipsilateral and 24 bilateral DKT. The mean score was 2.78 for SKT and 4.3/4.6 for DKT. RESULTS: Delayed graft function requiring dialysis occurred in 23 (56.1%) DKT and 70 (39.1%) SKT recipients. Primary nonfunction was observed in 1 (2.4%) DKT and 7 (3.9%) SKT recipients respectively. One DKT patient underwent monolateral transplantectomy. In the DKT versus SKT group, patient survivals were 92% versus 95%, 89% versus 93%, and 89 versus 91% at 12, 36, and 60 months, respectively (P = .3). Graft survivals were 100% versus 94%, 95% versus 90%, and 89% versus 78% at 12, 36, and 60 months, respectively (P < .001). We observed a lower incidence of chronic allograft nephropathy (P = .01) and a higher incidence of surgical adverse events (P = .04) in DKT. CONCLUSIONS: ECD graft survival using DKT provided better results compared with SKT, despite the use of organs from higher-risk donors. At 5 years follow-up, DKT was a safe strategy to face the organ shortage. To optimize the use of available kidneys, the criteria for DKT require further refinement and standardization. Preimplantation evaluation must maximize transplant success and protect recipients from receiving organs at increased risk of premature failure.