Efficacy and safety of a new low-volume PEG with citrate and simethicone bowel preparation for pediatric elective colonoscopy: Phase 3 RCT.

Background and study aims Currently available polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based preparations continue to represent a challenge in children. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a new low-volume PEG preparation with a conventional PEG-electrolyte solution (PEG-ES) in children and adolescents. Patients and methods This was a multicenter, randomized, observer-blind, parallel-group, phase 3 clinical trial, where patients were randomized between PMF104 (Clensia) and a conventional PEG-ES (Klean-Prep), and stratified by age stratum (2 to <6; 6 to < 12;12 to <18 years). The primary endpoint was to test the non-inferiority of PMF104 versus PEG-ES, in terms of colon cleansing. Safety, tolerability, acceptability, palatability, and compliance were also assessed. Efficacy endpoints were analyzed in the per protocol set (PPS) and full analysis set (FAS) and safety and tolerability endpoints in the safety set (SAF). Results Of the 356 patients enrolled, 258 were included in the PPS, 346 in the FAS, and 351 in the SAF. Non-inferiority of PMF104 was confirmed for children aged > 6 years and for all age groups in PPS and FAS, respectively. Optimal compliance was reported more frequently in the PMF104 than in the PEG-ES group, in both PPS (86.1% vs. 68.4%) and FAS (82.9% vs. 65.3%). Both preparations were equally safe and tolerable. Palatability and acceptability were considered better in the PMF104 group than in the PEG-ES group (27.1% vs. 15.3% and 15.3% vs. 3.5%, respectively). Conclusions In children aged 6 to 17 years, the new low-volume product PMF104 is non-inferior to the reference PEG-ES in terms of bowel cleansing, safety, and tolerability, with slightly better results in compliance, palatability, and acceptability.

Maintenance Golimumab Treatment in Pediatric UC Patients With Moderately to Severely Active UC: PURSUIT PEDS PK Long-Term Study Results.

Background: Long-term safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of open-label golimumab therapy in children with moderate-severe ulcerative colitis were evaluated. Methods: Week-6 golimumab responders (Mayo score decrease of ≥30% and ≥3 points from baseline, rectal bleeding subscore of 0/1 or ≥1 decrease from baseline) entered the long-term extension at week 14 and received maintenance therapy (subcutaneous, q4w). Patients ≥45 kg could receive at-home treatments at week 18. Pharmacokinetic, safety, and efficacy results were summarized through week 126 (2 years). Results: Among 35 enrolled children, 21 (60%) responded at week 6 and 20 entered the long-term extension (median age of 14.5 years and median weight of 46.1 kg). Eleven of 20 patients (55%) completed 2 years of treatment. No anaphylactic or serum sickness-like reactions, opportunistic infections, malignancies, tuberculosis, or deaths occurred. The safety profile of golimumab from weeks 14 through 126 and that observed through week 14 was generally consistent. Median trough golimumab concentrations in evaluable patients were consistent from weeks 14 (1.39, interquartile range 0.67-3.60) through 102 (1.18, 0.78-2.16), but higher at week 110 (4.10, 1.30-4.81). The incidence of antigolimumab antibodies increased from 10% (2/20) at week 30 to 25.0% (5/20) at week 126; 1 patient had neutralizing antibodies. At week 110, 50% (10/20) of patients were in remission (ie, Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index <10). Among all enrolled patients, 28.6% (10/35) achieved remission at week 110. Conclusions: Among children with ulcerative colitis who initially responded to golimumab induction and received q4w maintenance treatment in the long-term extension, 50% showed continued clinical benefit through 2 years. No new safety signals were observed.

Reflections on treatment of IBD in children and adolescents.

Major pharmaceutical advancements in the field of inflammatory bowel diseases benefit to children and adolescents affected with this progressive chronic condition. Scientific organisations such as ESPGHAN and ECCO actively publish guidelines related to the many aspects of care from these patients. Clinical studies and long-term prospective registries in the appropriate age groups are crucial to support an evidence based strategy.

Subcutaneous Golimumab in Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis: Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Benefit.

BACKGROUND: Current treatments for pediatric ulcerative colitis (UC) are limited. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics and clinical benefits of subcutaneous golimumab, an anti-tumor necrosis factor agent, in moderately-to-severely active pediatric patients with UC refractory to conventional therapy. METHODS: We report a multicenter, open-label study of golimumab with a pharmacokinetics phase (week 0-14). Patients had moderately-to-severely active UC and were naive to anti-tumor necrosis factor treatment. At weeks 0 and 2, patients received golimumab induction dosed by weight (<45 kg [90/45 mg/m]; ≥45 kg [200/100 mg]). Week 6 clinical responders continued golimumab q4w. Serum golimumab concentrations, clinical outcomes (Mayo score, PUCAI score), and adverse events are reported. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (71.4% pancolitis) aged 6 to 17 years had baseline median (interquartile range), age, weight, and disease duration of 15.0 (11.0-16.0) years, 50.6 (35.2-59.0) kg, and 1.2 (0.6-3.1) years, respectively. Baseline Mayo and PUCAI scores were 8.0 (6.0-9.0) and 45 (35.0-65.0), respectively. Median (interquartile range) serum golimumab concentrations were comparable to a historical reference adult UC population at weeks 2 (5.72 [3.80-9.17] µg/mL), 4 (7.61 [3.22-9.51] µg/mL), and 6 (2.64 [0.92-3.83] µg/mL). Serum golimumab concentrations were generally lower in the <45 kg than ≥45 kg weight subgroup. At week 6, 60%, 34%, and 54%, of patients achieved Mayo clinical response, PUCAI clinical remission, and mucosal healing (Mayo subscore 0/1). No clinically important safety concerns were reported. CONCLUSIONS: This open-label study demonstrates that pediatric and adult golimumab pharmacokinetics are similar. Clinical benefit and safety shows promise in biologically naive pediatric patients with UC.

Long-term Outcomes with Anti-TNF Therapy and Accelerated Step-up in the Prospective Pediatric Belgian Crohn's Disease Registry (BELCRO).

BACKGROUND: Accelerated step-up or anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) before first remission is currently not recommended in pediatric Crohn's disease. METHODS: Five-year follow-up data from a prospective observational cohort of children diagnosed with Crohn's disease in Belgium were analyzed. Disease severity was scored as inactive, mild, or moderate to severe. Remission or inactive disease was defined as sustained if lasting ≥2 years. Univariate analyses were performed between anti-TNF-exposed versus naive patients and anti-TNF before versus after first remission and correlations assessed with primary outcomes average disease severity and sustained remission. RESULTS: A total of 91 patients (median [IQR] age 12.7 [10.9-14.8] yrs, 53% male) were included. Disease location was 12% L1, 23% L2, and 64% L3 with 76% upper gastrointestinal and 30% perianal involvement. Disease severity was 25% mild and 75% moderate to severe. Of 66 (73%) anti-TNF-exposed patients, 34 (52%) had accelerated step-up. Anti-TNF use was associated with age (13.1 [11.5-15.2] versus 11.8 [8.7-13.8] yrs; P < 0.05), L2 (29% versus 8%; P = 0.04), and average disease severity (1.7 [1.4-1.9] versus 1.4 [1.3-1.6]; P < 0.001). Duration of anti-TNF correlated with average disease severity (r = 0.32, P = 0.002). Accelerated step-up was also associated with age (13.3 [12.1-15.9] versus 12.5 [10.2-14.1]; P = 0.02) and average disease severity (1.8 [1.6-1.9] versus 1.6 [1.3-1.8]; P = 0.002). Duration of sustained remission was similar in all patients, and no serious infections, cancer, or deaths were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-TNF therapy and accelerated step-up in older patients with more severe disease leads to beneficial long-term outcomes.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of local resection or transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus radical resection in stage i rectal cancer: A real standard?

Current guidelines recommend radical resection for stage I rectal cancer. However, since screening programs are being installed, an increasing number of cancers are being detected in early stages. Endoscopic resection is often performed at the time of diagnosis. This systematic review was undertaken to review the evidence on endoscopic approach vs. radical resection for stage I rectal cancer. Recommendations were issued based on the GRADE methodology and risk stratification used in clinical practice. A systematic search (until March 2015) identified 2 meta-analyses and 1 additional randomized trial. For the primary outcomes (overall survival, disease-free survival, local recurrence-free survival and metastasis-free survival) no evidence could be found on the superiority of local or radical resection. Secondary outcomes (blood loss, hospital stay, operative time, number of permanent stomas and perioperative deaths) were in favour of local resection. The authors strongly recommend radical resection for T2 rectal cancer, but consider 'en bloc' local resection sufficient for pT1 sm1 rectal cancers when confirmed pathologically. Discussion by a multidisciplinary team and adequate surveillance remain mandatory.

Systematic Review of the Efficacy and Safety of High-intensity Focussed Ultrasound for Localised Prostate Cancer.

CONTEXT: High-intensity focussed ultrasound (HIFU) has been used for 10 yr to treat localised prostate cancer (PCa). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate systematically the evidence on the efficacy and side effects of HIFU in the primary treatment of localised PCa. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We performed a critical review and appraisal of Medline (Ovid), PreMedline, Embase, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews publications on HIFU up to May 2013. One systematic review and 18 primary studies, all case series, were eligible. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Outcomes were summarised and evidence was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. Low-quality evidence suggests an overall survival rate after Ablatherm HIFU ranging from 80% to 89% for >5 yr. The PCa survival rate ranges from 97% to 99% for >5 yr. Effect of HIFU on quality of life remains undetermined. Erectile dysfunction was the most frequent adverse event reported from zero but up to 74% of patients. Adverse events affecting the urinary tract occurred in 0.7-31% of patients, bladder outlet obstruction in 4-51.5%, and they were more frequent in patients who had transurethral resection of the prostate the same day or within 2 d of HIFU. Outcomes vary for low- and high-risk categories. CONCLUSIONS: Good quality evidence on the efficacy of HIFU treatment for localised PCa is lacking. PATIENT SUMMARY: We reviewed all the data on treatment with high-intensity focussed ultrasound (HIFU) for localised prostate cancer (PCa). The quality of the evidence is very low because the information is based on a series of patients who received HIFU treatment with no comparison with active surveillance or radical treatment. Case series suggest an overall survival rate up to 89% and a PCa survival rate up to 99% after 5 yr, but these numbers vary according to the patient's risk category. Longer term and effects on quality of life are unknown.