Automatic quality control of the numerical accuracy of EEG lead fields.

Precise individualized EEG source localization is predicated on having accurate subject-specific Lead Fields (LFs) obtained from their Magnetic Resonance Images (MRI). LF calculation is a complex process involving several error-prone steps that start with obtaining a realistic head model from the MRI and finalizing with computationally expensive solvers such as the Boundary Element Method (BEM) or Finite Element Method (FEM). Current Big-Data applications require the calculation of batches of hundreds or thousands of LFs. LF. Quality Control is conventionally checked subjectively by experts, a procedure not feasible in practice for larger batches. To facilitate this step, we introduce the Lead Field Automatic-Quality Control Index (LF-AQI) that flags LF with potential errors. We base our LF-AQI on the assumption that LFs obtained from simpler head models, i.e., the homogeneous head model LF (HHM-LF) or spherical head model LF (SHM-LF), deviate only moderately from a "good" realistic test LF. Since these simpler LFs are easier to compute and check for errors, they may serve as "reference LF" to detect anomalous realistic test LF. We investigated this assumption by comparing correlation-based channel ρmin(ref,test)and source τmin(ref,test) similarity indices (SI) between "gold standards," i.e., very accurate FEM and BEM LFs, and the proposed references (HHM-LF and SHM-LF). Surprisingly we found that the most uncomplicated possible reference, HHM-LF had high SI values with the gold standards-leading us to explore further use of the channel ρmin(HHM-LF,test)and source τmin(HHM-LF,test)SI as a basis for our LF-AQI. Indeed, these SI successfully detected five simulated scenarios of LFs artifacts. This result encouraged us to evaluate the SI on a large dataset and thus define our LF-AQI. We thus computed the SI of 1251 LFs obtained from the Child Mind Institute (CMI) MRI dataset. When ρmin(HHM-LF,test)and source τmin(HHM-LF,test) were plotted for all test subjects on a 2D space, most were tightly clustered around the median of a high similarity centroid (HSC), except for a smaller proportion of outliers. We define the LF-AQI for a given LF as the log Euclidean distance between its SI and the HSC median. To automatically detect outliers, the threshold is at the 90th percentile of the CMI LF-AQIs (-0.9755). LF-AQI greater than this threshold flag individual LF to be checked. The robustness of this LF-AQI screening was checked by repeated out-of-sample validation. Strikingly, minor corrections in re-processing the flagged cases eliminated their status as outliers. Furthermore, the "doubtful" labels assigned by LF-AQI were validated by neuroscience students using a Likert scale questionnaire designed to manually check the LF's quality. Item Response Theory (IRT) analysis was applied to the questionnaire results to compute an optimized model and a latent variable θ for that model. A linear mixed model (LMM) between the θ and LF-AQI resulted in an effect with a Cohen's d value of 1.3 and a p-value <0.001, thus validating the correspondence of LF-AQI with the visual quality control. We provide an open-source pipeline to implement both LF calculation and its quality control to allow further evaluation of our index.

Embracing diversity and inclusivity in an academic setting: Insights from the Organization for Human Brain Mapping.

Scientific research aims to bring forward innovative ideas and constantly challenges existing knowledge structures and stereotypes. However, women, ethnic and cultural minorities, as well as individuals with disabilities, are systematically discriminated against or even excluded from promotions, publications, and general visibility. A more diverse workforce is more productive, and thus discrimination has a negative impact on science and the wider society, as well as on the education, careers, and well-being of individuals who are discriminated against. Moreover, the lack of diversity at scientific gatherings can lead to micro-aggressions or harassment, making such meetings unpleasant, or even unsafe environments for early career and underrepresented scientists. At the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM), we recognized the need for promoting underrepresented scientists and creating diverse role models in the field of neuroimaging. To foster this, the OHBM has created a Diversity and Inclusivity Committee (DIC). In this article, we review the composition and activities of the DIC that have promoted diversity within OHBM, in order to inspire other organizations to implement similar initiatives. Activities of the committee over the past four years have included (a) creating a code of conduct, (b) providing diversity and inclusivity education for OHBM members, (c) organizing interviews and symposia on diversity issues, and (d) organizing family-friendly activities and providing childcare grants during the OHBM annual meetings. We strongly believe that these activities have brought positive change within the wider OHBM community, improving inclusivity and fostering diversity while promoting rigorous, ground-breaking science. These positive changes could not have been so rapidly implemented without the enthusiastic support from the leadership, including OHBM Council and Program Committee, and the OHBM Special Interest Groups (SIGs), namely the Open Science, Student and Postdoc, and Brain-Art SIGs. Nevertheless, there remains ample room for improvement, in all areas, and even more so in the area of targeted attempts to increase inclusivity for women, individuals with disabilities, members of the LGBTQ+ community, racial/ethnic minorities, and individuals of lower socioeconomic status or from low and middle-income countries. Here, we present an overview of the DIC's composition, its activities, future directions and challenges. Our goal is to share our experiences with a wider audience to provide information to other organizations and institutions wishing to implement similar comprehensive diversity initiatives. We propose that scientific organizations can push the boundaries of scientific progress only by moving beyond existing power structures and by integrating principles of equity and inclusivity in their core values.