Prognostic implications of systolic function in patients with cirrhosis.

INTRODUCTION: LV intrinsic systolic cardiac function in cirrhotic patients is conditioned by the degree of sympathetic activation and the use of non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs). Systolic function can be non-invasively measured by ultrasound using Ejection Intraventricular Pressure Differences in the LV (EIVPD). We aimed to address the relationship between systolic function and long-term clinical outcomes using EIVPD. METHODS: We studied 45 Child-Pugh B or C patients (13 female, 24 on NSBBs) using echocardiography. The primary endpoint was the combination of any-cause mortality or liver transplantation. After a follow-up of 7 years (796 person-months) and a median period of 17 (10-42) months, 41 patients (91%) reached the primary endpoint: 13 (29%) died and 28 (62%) underwent transplantation. RESULTS: By univariable analysis the primary endpoint was related exclusively to MELD score. However, in a multivariable proportional-hazards analysis, adjusted for age, sex and MELD score, EIVPD was inversely related to the primary endpoint, showing interaction with NSBBs. In patients without NSBBs, EIVPD inversely predicted the primary endpoint, whereas in patients with NSBBs, EIVPD was unrelated to outcomes. These relationships were undetected by myocardial strain or conventional cardiac indices. CONCLUSIONS: LV intrinsic systolic function, as noninvasively measured by EIVPD is a predictor of long-term outcomes in patients with cirrhosis. The prognostic value of EIVPD is present along any degree of liver dysfunction but blunted by NSBBs. Because NSBBs have a deep effect on myocardial contractility, these drugs need to be considered when assessing the prognostic implications of cardiac function in these patients.

Hepatotoxicity after high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone in multiple sclerosis patients.

Hepatotoxicity is a rare adverse event of methylprednisolone that should be considered in clinical practice. In patients at risk, we propose liver function surveillance, by measuring hepatic enzymes concentration 15-30 days after methylprednisolone administration. Additionally, we propose ACTH, dexamethasone, or plasma exchange as alternate treatment options for these patients.

Influencia del tratamiento del hepatocarcinoma antes del trasplante hepático en la recurrencia tumoral y supervivencia postrasplante / Influence of treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation on postransplant tumor recurrence and survival

ObjetivosEvaluar la efectividad del tratamiento del carcinoma hepatocelular (CHC) previo al trasplante hepático (TH) y su influencia sobre la supervivencia y recurrencia tumoral en pacientes trasplantados con CHC.Pacientes y métodosSe incluyeron 67 pacientes trasplantados con diagnóstico preoperatorio de CHC y confirmación en el explante entre enero del año 2000 y octubre del año 2007. Se realizó tratamiento pretrasplante en 46 pacientes (68,7%) (18 radiofrecuencia, 31 quimioembolización transarterial y 2 alcoholización).ResultadosLa mediana de tiempo entre la inclusión en lista y el TH fue de 4 meses, y fue similar en pacientes tratados y no tratados. El tiempo entre la realización del tratamiento y el TH fue menor de 6 meses en el 65,2%. Los pacientes tratados presentaban mejor función hepática (Child A: el 52,2 vs. el 19%; Child B: el 39,1 vs. el 33,3%; Child C: el 8,7 vs. el 47,6%; p=0,001) y una mayor proporción de tamaño tumoral total >3cm (59,1 vs. 30%; p=0,031). Se confirmó necrosis total del CHC en el 26,1% de los pacientes sin diferencias en el grado de necrosis según el tipo de tratamiento o tamaño tumoral. En 6 pacientes (9%) se produjo recurrencia del CHC. La mediana de tiempo entre el TH y la recurrencia fue de 26,5 meses con una supervivencia tras ésta de 6,6 meses. La supervivencia global fue del 83,5, el 69,9 y el 59,5% y la supervivencia libre de recurrencia tumoral fue del 83,5, el 68,3 y el 58% a 1, 3 y 5 años, respectivamente. El haber recibido tratamiento previo no influyó en la probabilidad de recurrencia o en la supervivencia. Asimismo, el grado de necrosis tampoco se relacionó con la supervivencia o la frecuencia de recurrencia.ConclusiónLa realización de tratamiento del CHC previo al TH en pacientes con un período en lista de espera menor de 6 meses no parece influir en la supervivencia o en la prevención de la recurrencia tumoral postrasplante (AU)

ObjectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness of treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) before liver transplantation (LT) and its influence on survival and tumor recurrence in patients transplanted for HCC.Patients and methodsWe included 67 liver transplant patients with a preoperative diagnosis of HCC and pathological confirmation in the native liver between January 2000 and October 2007. Treatment before LT was performed in 46 (68.7%) patients [radiofrequency ablation in 18, transarterial chemoembolization in 31 and percutaneous ethanol injection in two].ResultsThe median time between inclusion on the waiting list and LT was 4 months and was similar in treated and untreated patients. The median time between pre-transplantation locoregional therapy and LT was less than 6 months in 65.2% of the patients. Treated patients had better liver function (Child A 52.2 vs 19%; Child B 39.1 vs 33.3%; Child C 8.7 vs. 47.6%; p=0.001) and a higher proportion of total tumor size >3cm (59.1% vs 30%; p=0.031). Total tumor necrosis was observed in 26.1% of the patients, with no differences according to treatment modality or tumor size. Tumor recurrence occurred in six patients (9%). The median time between LT and tumor recurrence was 26.5 months with a subsequent median survival of 6.6 months. Overall survival was 83.5%, 69.9% and 59.5%, and tumor recurrence-free survival was 83.5%, 68.3% and 58% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. Previous HCC treatment showed no influence on survival or tumor recurrence. Likewise, the grade of tumor necrosis was unrelated to overall survival or the probability of recurrence.ConclusionTreatment of HCC before LT in patients with a waiting list time of less than 6 months does not appear to influence survival or tumor recurrence(AU)

[Influence of treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation on post transplant tumor recurrence and survival]. / Influencia del tratamiento del hepatocarcinoma antes del trasplante hepático en la recurrencia tumoral y supervivencia postrasplante.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) before liver transplantation (LT) and its influence on survival and tumor recurrence in patients transplanted for HCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 67 liver transplant patients with a preoperative diagnosis of HCC and pathological confirmation in the native liver between January 2000 and October 2007. Treatment before LT was performed in 46 (68.7%) patients [radiofrequency ablation in 18, transarterial chemoembolization in 31 and percutaneous ethanol injection in two]. RESULTS: The median time between inclusion on the waiting list and LT was 4 months and was similar in treated and untreated patients. The median time between pre-transplantation locoregional therapy and LT was less than 6 months in 65.2% of the patients. Treated patients had better liver function (Child A 52.2 vs 19%; Child B 39.1 vs 33.3%; Child C 8.7 vs. 47.6%; p=0.001) and a higher proportion of total tumor size > 3 cm (59.1% vs 30%; p=0.031). Total tumor necrosis was observed in 26.1% of the patients, with no differences according to treatment modality or tumor size. Tumor recurrence occurred in six patients (9%). The median time between LT and tumor recurrence was 26.5 months with a subsequent median survival of 6.6 months. Overall survival was 83.5%, 69.9% and 59.5%, and tumor recurrence-free survival was 83.5%, 68.3% and 58% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. Previous HCC treatment showed no influence on survival or tumor recurrence. Likewise, the grade of tumor necrosis was unrelated to overall survival or the probability of recurrence. CONCLUSION: Treatment of HCC before LT in patients with a waiting list time of less than 6 months does not appear to influence survival or tumor recurrence.