Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 79: 273-278, 2022 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34644640

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Low profile endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) devices such as the Cordis INCRAFT AAA Stent Graft System may expand the category of patients suitable for endovascular repair. We report our experience with the INCRAFT system in treating ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA). METHODS: We included all patients presenting with rAAA from 2015 to 2019 in our hospital who were treated by percutaneous EVAR with the INCRAFT system. The primary outcome was technical success, referring to adequate stent graft placement. Secondary outcomes included completion of the procedure under local anesthesia and mortality at 30-days, one year and long-term follow-up. RESULTS: Fifteen male patients (mean age: 74 years, SD 6.7) were treated for rAAA with a median aneurysm diameter of 8.25 cm (SD 1.66). The device was successfully delivered and deployed in all subjects. Per-procedurally one type I endoleak required additional stent placement and one patient developed an acute thrombosis of the device main body and iliac limbs requiring thrombectomy. 80.0% of patients were successfully treated under local anesthesia only. The 30 day and one year mortality were 26.6% and 33.3% respectively. Long-term survival was 60.0% at a median follow-up period of 57 months, with two patients requiring late reintervention for an endoleak. CONCLUSIONS: The INCRAFT system can be used to percutaneously treat rAAA with a high technical success rate and mortality similar to reported in the literature for other devices. The large majority of procedures can be completed with only local anesthesia.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Ruptura Aórtica/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Prótese Vascular , Procedimentos Endovasculares/instrumentação , Stents , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anestesia Local , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Ruptura Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Desenho de Prótese , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 73: 407-416, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33383137

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Colonic ischemia remains a severe complication after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair and is associated with a high mortality. With open repair being one of the main risk factors of colonic ischemia, deciding between endovascular or open aneurysm repair should be based on tailor-made medicine. This study aims to identify high-risk patients of colonic ischemia, a risk that can be taken into account while deciding on AAA treatment strategy. METHODS: A nationwide population-based cohort study of 9,433 patients who underwent an AAA operation between 2014 and 2016 was conducted. Potential risk factors were determined by reviewing prior studies and univariate analysis. With logistic regression analysis, independent predictors of intestinal ischemia were established. These variables were used to form a prediction model. RESULTS: Intestinal ischemia occurred in 267 patients (2.8%). Occurrence of intestinal ischemia was seen significantly more in open repair versus endovascular aneurysm repair (7.6% vs. 0.9%; P < 0.001). This difference remained significant after stratification by urgency of the procedure, in both intact open (4.2% vs. 0.4%; P < 0.001) and ruptured open repair (15.0% vs. 6.2%); P < 0.001). Rupture of the AAA was the most important predictor of developing intestinal ischemia (odds ratio [OR], 5.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.4-8.0), followed by having a suprarenal AAA (OR 3.4; CI 1.1-10.6). Associated procedural factors were open repair (OR 2.8; 95% CI 1.9-4.2), blood loss >1L (OR 3.6; 95% CI 1.7-7.5), and prolonged operating time (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.4-2.8). Patient characteristics included having peripheral arterial disease (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.3-4.4), female gender (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.2-2.4), renal insufficiency (OR 1.7; 1.3-2.2), and pulmonary history (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.2-2.2). Age <68 years proved to be a protective factor (OR 0.5; 95% CI 0.4-0.8). Associated mortality was higher in patients with intestinal ischemia versus patients without (50.6% vs. 5.1%, P < 0.001). Each predictor was given a score between 1 and 4. Patients with a score of ≥10 proved to be at high risk. A prediction model with an excellent AUC = 0.873 (95% CI 0.855-0.892) could be formed. CONCLUSIONS: One of the main risk factors is open repair. Several other risk factors can contribute to developing colonic ischemia after AAA repair. The proposed prediction model can be used to identify patients at high risk for developing colonic ischemia. With the current trend in AAA repair leaning toward open repair for better long-term results, our prediction model allows a better informed decision can be made in AAA treatment strategy.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Colo/irrigação sanguínea , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Isquemia Mesentérica/etiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Emergências , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Isquemia Mesentérica/diagnóstico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 44: 424.e11-424.e13, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28602900

RESUMO

Infected or mycotic aneurysms (MAs) of the aorta and adjacent arteries are rare and difficult to treat. We report a unique case of a Salmonella serotype enteritidis-induced rapidly expanding aortic and iliac pseudoaneurysm during preoperative workup. Based on the presented case, we postulate that the agressive nature of Salmonella enteritidis MAs should not be underestimated. If postponed intervention is chosen and the patient is managed conservatively with antibiotic therapy to create a window of definitive diagnosis, one should consider close follow-up imaging to observe progression of the pseudoaneurysm. This may prevent the need of acute intervention.


Assuntos
Falso Aneurisma/microbiologia , Aneurisma Infectado/microbiologia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/microbiologia , Aneurisma Ilíaco/microbiologia , Infecções por Salmonella/microbiologia , Salmonella enteritidis/isolamento & purificação , Falso Aneurisma/diagnóstico por imagem , Falso Aneurisma/terapia , Aneurisma Infectado/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma Infectado/terapia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/terapia , Aortografia , Implante de Prótese Vascular , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Humanos , Aneurisma Ilíaco/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma Ilíaco/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções por Salmonella/diagnóstico por imagem , Infecções por Salmonella/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 43: 296-301, 2017 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28478168

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Fenestration is a minimally invasive alternative for the treatment of acute symptomatic aortic dissections because it may quickly decrease the pressure gradient of the false lumen. It remains unclear where the optimal location of these fenestrations should be chosen. The purpose of this study was to study false lumen volume (FLV) after different fenestration strategies in porcine ex vivo models of aortic type B dissection. METHODS: An artificial dissection was created in ex vivo porcine aortas. A total number of 6 aortic dissection models were made. The dissection flap was divided in 3 equal parts; proximal, mid, and distal sections. In 3 models, a fenestration was made in the center of the proximal section of the dissection flap. In the 3 others in the center of the distal part of the dissection flap. The aorta was positioned in a validated in vitro circulatory system with physiological pulsatile flow. Volume measurements of true lumen volume and FLV were assessed with computed tomography. RESULTS: Performing a fenestration in the proximal part of the dissection flap resulted in FLV increase in 2 of the 3 models. Performing a fenestration in the distal part of the dissection flap resulted in FLV decrease in all 3 models. False lumen reduction was obtained significantly in the distally fenestrated models compared to the proximally fenestrated models (9.6 ± 3.5% vs. 0.7 ± 2.9%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In this ex vivo study, we showed that distal fenestration of the false lumen in aortic dissection will result in the largest false lumen reduction.


Assuntos
Aneurisma Aórtico/cirurgia , Dissecção Aórtica/cirurgia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/métodos , Dissecção Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Dissecção Aórtica/fisiopatologia , Animais , Aneurisma Aórtico/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma Aórtico/fisiopatologia , Aortografia/métodos , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Técnicas In Vitro , Modelos Animais , Fluxo Sanguíneo Regional , Sus scrofa
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...