Randomized comparison of group cognitive behaviour therapy and group psychoeducation in acute patients with schizophrenia: effects on subjective quality of life.

OBJECTIVE: Although the clinical efficacy of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) has been established for patients with schizophrenia, the data on effects on quality of life (QoL) are lacking. The purpose of the present study was therefore to compare the effects of a brief group CBT and a group psychoeducational (PE) programme in patients with schizophrenia on QoL. METHOD: A total of 88 inpatients with schizophrenia were randomized to receive a therapy envelope of 8 weeks including either 16 sessions of group CBT or eight sessions of group PE treatment. QoL was assessed using the Modular System for Quality of Life at baseline, post-treatment assessment and 6 month follow up. RESULTS: QoL improved significantly in both treatments in most QoL dimensions. Within-group effect sizes for general QoL at follow up were 0.25 for CBT and 0.29 for PE. No significant differences between CBT and PE were found at post-treatment and at 6 month follow up. CONCLUSIONS: Both brief group CBT and group PE improve subjective QoL in patients with schizophrenia.

Randomized controlled multicentre trial of cognitive behaviour therapy in the early initial prodromal state: effects on social adjustment post treatment.

AIM: Improvement of social adjustment is a major aim of indicated prevention in young people at risk of developing psychosis. The present study explores the effect of specific cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) as compared with supportive counselling (SC) on social adjustment in people in a potential early initial prodromal state of psychosis (EIPS) primarily defined by self-experienced cognitive thought and perception deficits (basic symptoms). METHODS: A total of 128 help-seeking outpatients in the EIPS were randomized to receive either specific CBT or SC for 12 months. Social adjustment was assessed with the Social Adjustment Scale II (SAS II) at baseline, time of transition or post treatment RESULTS: From 113 patients, who completed the SAS II at intake, 67 (59.3%) completed the SAS assessments at time of transition or post treatment. Both specific CBT and SC resulted in improvements in scales of SAS II, with no significant between-group differences post treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Although treatment in specially designed early detection and intervention centres improves functioning of people in the EIPS, specific CBT was not superior to SC. One could hypothesize that additional vocational rehabilitation, case management and involvement of multidisciplinary teams are needed to further improve short-term outcome of specific interventions on this dimension.

Recent approaches to psychological interventions for people at risk of psychosis.

With the emerging global focus on early psychosis, indicated prevention in schizophrenia has increasingly become a focus of psychiatric research interests. It has been argued that CBT may have some advantages compared with antipsychotics regarding this issue. According to MEDLINE, EMBASE and Psycinfo two completed randomised controlled trials (RCTs; PACE, Melbourne, Australia; EDIE, Manchester, United Kingdom) and one ongoing RCT with only preliminary results published so far (FETZ, Cologne/Bonn, Germany) on indicated prevention in schizophrenia including manualised and standardised psychological treatment can be identified. The aims of the present paper are to present and discuss the three approaches with regard to (I) inclusion, exclusion and exit criteria, (II) characteristics of interventions and (III) evaluations. All interventions use intake, exclusion and exit criteria, which have been evaluated in prospective follow-along studies. The approaches are based on the general structure and principles of cognitive behavioural therapy which have been developed, applied and evaluated in a wide range of mental health problems. Despite several methodological limitations, the first evaluations indicate some effects with regard to three possible aims of early intervention: (1) improvement of present possible pre-psychotic symptoms, (2) prevention of social decline/stagnation and (3) prevention or delay of progression to psychosis. Even though the first results are promising, we conclude that several ethical issues have to be taken into consideration and further predictive and therapeutic research is needed to judge whether psychological intervention is a realistic option for the treatment of people at risk of psychosis.

Cognitive-behavioral therapy in the pre-psychotic phase: an exploratory study.

Although the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) in schizophrenia has been established for persistent psychotic symptoms, little information is available on the effects of CBT in the pre-psychotic phase. We developed a comprehensive CBT program for clients in the early initial prodromal state that showed good feasibility and promising treatment effects in an uncontrolled prospective study. The specificity of these effects needs to be explored in a controlled trial.

Subjective quality of life in subjects at risk for a first episode of psychosis: a comparison with first episode schizophrenia patients and healthy controls.

The concept of quality of life (QoL) is of growing relevance in schizophrenia research. However, there is to date no information on subjective QoL in subjects at risk for a first episode of psychosis in comparison to first episode schizophrenia patients (FE) or healthy controls (HC). Therefore 45 subjects in a putatively early initial prodromal state (EIPS), 40 FE and 45 HC were assessed on demographics, symptoms and subjective QoL as measured by the Modular System for Quality of Life. Results indicated that in most areas HC experienced the highest QoL scores followed in hierarchical order by EIPS and FE. EIPS and FE experienced significantly lower QoL than HC in 5 and 6 of 7 QoL domains. EIPS experienced the lowest ratings in affective QoL. Thus the data demonstrates that subjective QoL in subjects at risk for a first episode of psychosis is substantially reduced when compared with HC and suggests that subjective QoL is already compromised prior to the onset of first positive schizophrenia symptoms. These findings support the notion that subjects at risk for a first episode of psychosis constitute a clinical population for which further service and intervention research is indicated.