RESUMO
BACKGROUND: National legislation in Pakistan regulating blood banks has been introduced several times, but has never been passed. To support provincial-level efforts to develop legislation we conducted a study to evaluate blood-banking practices in Karachi, Pakistan, to identify areas that could be improved. METHODS: Thirty-seven blood banks were randomly selected from a list of 87 Karachi blood banks. The research team interviewed blood bank personnel, inspected available facilities and equipment, and observed blood collection using structured questionnaires and observation forms. RESULTS: Of the 37 selected facilities, 25 were operational and 24 agreed to participate. Twelve (50%) of the facilities reported regularly utilizing paid blood donors, while only six (25%) activity recruited volunteer donors. During observation only 8% of facilities asked donors about injecting drug use, and none asked donors any questions about high-risk sexual behaviour. While 95% of blood banks had appropriate equipment and reagents to screen for hepatitis B, only 55% could screen for HIV and 23% for hepatitis C. Twenty-nine percent of the facilities were storing blood products outside the WHO recommended temperature limits. IMPLICATIONS: Practices at most Karachi blood banks fell well below WHO standards. Findings from this study were instrumental in developing and passing legislation to regulate blood transfusion throughout Sindh Province, and suggest a method for improving blood transfusion practices in other developing countries.
Assuntos
Bancos de Sangue/normas , Fiscalização e Controle de Instalações/legislação & jurisprudência , Bancos de Sangue/legislação & jurisprudência , Bancos de Sangue/organização & administração , Doadores de Sangue , Transfusão de Sangue , Coleta de Dados , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento , Paquistão , Admissão e Escalonamento de Pessoal , Gestão da Segurança/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Intimate contacts of a patient with meningococcal disease are at greater risk of disease than the general population and are offered chemoprophylaxis in order to prevent secondary cases. School contact is not considered a risk factor unless a further case develops. Bacteriological sampling of contacts to identify potential sources of infection is not considered warranted. We have questioned these approaches and investigated the contacts of a 9-year-old child with meningitis caused by sulphonamide-sensitive Neisseria meningitidis group C. Household carriers were not identified but 7/34 classmates were carrying the index strain suggesting that transmission was occurring within this population. The current recommendations for prophylaxis are based on information gathered in socioepidemiological settings, and involving strains which differ from those now prevalent. Such extrapolations may not be justified and further microbiological studies seem warranted to re-examine meningococcal transmission and prophylaxis usage in school children.