Use of endotracheal tubes with subglottic secretion drainage reduces ventilator-associated pneumonia in trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients sustaining traumatic injuries have a higher incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) compared with other critically ill patient populations. Previous studies of patients with predominantly medical diagnoses and use of endotracheal tubes allowing subglottic secretion drainage (ETT-SSD) have shown significant reduction in VAP rates. We hypothesized that the use of ETT-SSD would reduce VAP in trauma patients. METHODS: A retrospective review from 2010 to 2014 of adult trauma patients orotracheally intubated for more than 48 hours was performed at a Level 1 trauma center. Patients were compared based on standard endotracheal tube (ETT) versus ETT-SSD for the primary outcome VAP per 1,000 ventilator days. The diagnosis of VAP was made by quantitative bronchoalveolar lavage cultures as defined by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. Patients with ETT-SSD were matched to patients with ETT based on age group, sex, mechanism of injury, head and chest Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score, and Injury Severity Score (ISS). RESULTS: Of 1,135 patients included in the study, 667 patients had ETT and 468 had ETT-SSD. Groups did not differ by demographics, mechanism of injury, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, alcohol intoxication, or ISS. Patients with ETT-SSD had significantly higher head AIS score but lower chest AIS score. In matched cohorts, ETT-SSD had a lower VAP rate (5.7 vs. 9.3 for ETT, p = 0.03), decreased ventilator days (12 vs. 14, p = 0.04), and decreased intensive care unit length of stay (13 days vs. 16 days, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: After controlling for confounding factors, ETT-SSD decreased VAP rate, ventilator days, and intensive care unit length of stay in trauma patients. In this high-risk patient population, we recommend routine use of ETT-SSD to decrease VAP. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management study, level III.

Novel method of delivery of continuous positive airway pressure for apnea testing during brain death evaluation.

BACKGROUND: There are several methods for apnea testing for the evaluation of neurological death, including oxygen via T-piece, oxygen cannula inserted into the endotracheal tube, and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Lung suitability for transplantation is determined in part by the partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) to fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2; P:F) ratio. We hypothesized that delivery of CPAP during apnea testing using a novel method would improve post-test P:F ratios. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed at a level I trauma center for all patients undergoing apnea testing from 2010 to 2016. The CPAP system used a flow-inflating bag and was made available in 2012. It was used at the discretion of the clinician. Patients were classified as having an apnea test by CPAP or by non-CPAP method (T-piece, oxygen cannula in endotracheal tube, etc). The two groups were compared for baseline characteristics and the primary outcome of postapnea test P:F ratio. RESULTS: During the study period, 145 patients underwent apnea testing; 67 patients by the CPAP method and 78 by non-CPAP method. There were no significant differences in demographics, mechanism of brain injury, pneumonia rate, smoking status, or antibiotic usage between the two groups. The pretest P:F ratio was similar between groups, but the CPAP group had significantly higher post-test P:F ratio (304 vs 250, p=0.02). There were no reported complications arising from CPAP use. CONCLUSIONS: We describe a novel method of delivering CPAP by a flow-inflating bag during examination for brain death. This method led to improved oxygenation, P:F ratios, and may decrease barotrauma. The flow-inflating bag was inexpensive, easily implemented, and without adverse effects. Multicentered, prospective trials are needed to elicit significant benefit in lung donation and transplantation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, diagnostic tests.

Prone ventilation in trauma or surgical patients with acute lung injury and adult respiratory distress syndrome: is it beneficial?

BACKGROUND: To compare the effectiveness of supine versus prone kinetic therapy in mechanically ventilated trauma and surgical patients with acute lung injury (ALI) and adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients with ALI/ARDS who were placed on either a supine (roto-rest) or prone (roto-prone) oscillating bed was performed. Data obtained included age, revised trauma score (RTS), base deficit, Injury Severity Score (ISS), head Abbreviated Injury Scale score (AIS), chest (AIS), PaO2/FiO2 ratio, FiO2 requirement, central venous pressure (CVP), days on the bed, ventilator days, use of pressors, complications, mortality, and pulmonary-associated mortality. Data are expressed as mean+/-SE with significance attributed to p<0.05. RESULTS: From March 1, 2004 through May 31, 2006, 4,507 trauma patients were admitted and 221 were identified in the trauma registry as having ALI or ARDS. Of these, 53 met inclusion criteria. Additionally, 8 general surgery patients met inclusion criteria. Of these 61 patients, 44 patients were positioned supine, 13 were placed prone, and 4 patients that were initially placed supine were changed to prone positioning. There was no difference between the groups in age, CVP, ISS, RTS, base deficit, head AIS score, chest AIS score, abdominal AIS score, or probability of survival. The PaO2/FiO2 ratios were not different at study entry (149 vs. 153, p=NS), and both groups showed improvement in PaO2/FiO2 ratios. However, the prone group had better PaO2/FiO2 ratios than the supine group by day 5 (243 vs. 200, p=0.066). The prone group had fewer days on the ventilator (13.6 vs. 24.2, p=0.12), and shorter hospital lengths of stay (22 days vs. 40 days, p=0.08). There were four patients who failed to improve with supine kinetic therapy that were changed to prone kinetic therapy. These patients had significant improvements in PaO2/FiO2 ratio, and significantly lower FiO2 requirements. There were 18 deaths (7 pulmonary related) in the supine group and 1 death in the prone group (p < 0.01 by chi test). CONCLUSIONS: ALI/ARDS patients who received prone kinetic therapy had greater improvement in PaO2/FiO2 ratio, lower mortality, and less pulmonary-related mortality than did supine positioned patients. The use of a prone-oscillating bed appears advantageous for trauma and surgical patients with ALI/ARDS and a prospective, randomized trial is warranted.