RESUMO
Background: Brazil is a middle-income country with inequalities in its healthcare system. The disparities between public and private services affect the diagnosis and treatment of patients with breast cancer. The aim of this study is to assess whether disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) are different in public and private specialized centers. Patient and methods: A retrospective cohort study with 1,545 breast cancer patients diagnosed from 2003 to 2011 at Barretos Cancer Hospital-BCH (public group, N = 1,408) and InORP Oncoclinicas (private group, N = 137) was conducted. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to adjust the differences between the groups' characteristics (n = 137 in each group). Results: The median age at diagnosis was 54.4 years. Estimated DFS rates at 1, 5, and 10 years were 96.0%, 71.8%, and 59.6%, respectively, at BCH and 97.8%, 86.9%, and 78%, respectively, at InORP (HR: 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41-3.10; p < 0.0001). Estimated OS rates at 1, 5, and 10 years were 98.1%, 78.5%, and 65.4%, respectively, at BCH and 99.3%, 94.5%, and 91.9%, respectively, at InORP (HR: 3.84; 95% CI, 2.16-6.82; p < 0.0001). After adjustment by PSM, DFS and OS results in 1, 3, and 5 years remained worse in the public service compared to the private service. Conclusion: Patients treated in a public center have worse DFS and OS after a follow-up period of more than 5 years. These results were corroborated after carrying out the PSM.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To identify if baseline patient or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features can predict which women are at risk for inadequate tumor coverage with only intracavitary tandem and ovoid (T + O) brachytherapy and to correlate tumor coverage with clinical outcomes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed a retrospective study of 50 women with cervical cancer treated with chemoradiation at a single institution between January 2014 and December 2015. All patients had a 3T-MRI performed at baseline (MRI1) and at the completion of external beam radiation therapy (MRI2). Gross tumor volume initial (GTV-Tinit) was measured on MRI1 and high-risk clinical tissue volume (CTVHR) on MRI2. CTVHR extending beyond point A was classified as too large for adequate coverage with T + O and requiring interstitial needles. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine predictive factors of inadequate coverage. Kaplan-Meier and Cox Regression were performed to correlate inadequate coverage with outcomes. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 49.2 ± 13.2 years, and 84% had Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics IIB/IIIB disease. Forty-two percent of women were estimated to have inadequate tumor coverage with T + O brachytherapy. The GTV-Tinit volume and dimensions (superior-inferior, left-right, anterior-posterior) on MRI1 were all important predictive factors of inadequate coverage on multivariate analysis. Receiver operating characteristics curves identified optimal thresholds of superior-inferior ≥ 4.5 cm (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.718), left-right ≥ 4.5 cm (AUC = 0.745), anterior-posterior ≥ 5.0 cm (AUC = 0.767), and GTV-Tinit ≥ 85 cm3 (AUC = 0.842). Patients with inadequate coverage had worse clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline MRI tumor size may predict inadequate CTVHR coverage at the time of brachytherapy (i.e., the need for interstitial needles). This may help identify a subset of women requiring early referral to adequately resourced centers to improve clinical outcomes.
