Impact of perioperative factors on short-term outcomes after emergency surgery for acute traumatic extradural hematoma - A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative clinical and imaging findings predict neurological outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Similarly, intraoperative factors such as blood loss and hypotension can also affect outcomes. However, there is not much data regarding the influence of perioperative variables on clinical outcomes in patients with extradural hematoma (EDH). This study aimed to understand the effect of perioperative factors on short-term neurological outcomes in patients operated for acute traumatic EDH. METHODS: After obtaining institutional ethical approval, we collected data retrospectively from records of patients who underwent emergency surgery for acute traumatic EDH over a two-year period. Data regarding age, gender, preoperative Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score, clinical and imaging findings, surgical and anesthetic details, blood loss and transfusion, duration of hospital stay, and GCS score at discharge were collected. Patients with discharge GCS score of 14-15 were considered to have favorable outcome and <14 as unfavorable outcome. Regression analysis was performed to examine the association between predictors and outcomes. Odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: Data of 501 patients were analyzed. Outcome was favorable in 343 (68.5 %) and unfavorable in 158 (31.5 %) patients. On multivariate logistic regression analysis (OR, 95 % CI, p value), age (1.03, 1.01-1.05, 0.01), preoperative GCS score (0.68, 0.61-0.76, <0.001), signs of basal skull fracture (1.9, 1.02-3.61, 0.043) and intraoperative blood loss (2.23, 1.2-4.16, 0.01) were independently associated with unfavorable outcome. Pneumonia, neurological deficits, inotrope use and duration of hospital stay was more in this group. CONCLUSIONS: Older age, poor pre-operative GCS score, signs of basal skull fracture, and intraoperative blood loss were associated with lower discharge GCS score, increased neurological deficits and longer hospital stay in patients operated for acute traumatic EDH.

Association between patient characteristics and dissatisfaction after cranial neurosurgery: A prospective observational study.

Objectives: Patient satisfaction is an indicator of the quality of healthcare. It can improve treatment adherence and health outcomes. This study aimed to determine the incidence, predictive factors, and impact of post-operative patient dissatisfaction with perioperative care after cranial neurosurgery. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective observational study conducted in a tertiary care academic university hospital. Adult patients undergoing cranial neurosurgery were assessed for satisfaction 24 h after surgery using a five-point scale. The data regarding patient characteristics that may predict dissatisfaction after surgery were collected along with ambulation time and hospital stay. Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess normality of data. Univariate analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney U-test and significant factors were entered into binary logistic regression model for identifying predictors. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: Four hundred and ninety-six adult patients undergoing cranial neurosurgery were recruited into the study from September 2021 to June 2022. Data of 390 were analyzed. The incidence of patient dissatisfaction was 20.5%. On univariate analysis, literacy, economic status, pre-operative pain, and anxiety were associated with post-operative patient dissatisfaction. On logistic regression analysis, illiteracy, higher economic status, and no pre-operative anxiety were predictors of dissatisfaction. The patient dissatisfaction did not impact ambulation time or duration of hospital stay after the surgery. Conclusion: One in five patients reported dissatisfaction after cranial neurosurgery. Illiteracy, higher economic status, and no pre-operative anxiety were predictors of patient dissatisfaction. Dissatisfaction was not associated with delayed ambulation or hospital discharge.

Clinical efficacy and neurobiological correlates of electroconvulsive therapy in patients with clozapine-resistant/intolerant schizophrenia: study protocol of multi-site parallel arm double-blind randomized sham-controlled study.

Background: A substantial proportion of patients with treatment resistant schizophrenia do not respond well or partially to clozapine, with a subset that does not tolerate an adequate trial of clozapine. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is regarded as one of the augmenting options, but there is a lack of high-quality evidence for this practice. This protocol describes a double-blind randomised sham-controlled modified-ECT trial to evaluate its efficacy in patients with clozapine resistant/intolerant schizophrenia. The study also involves multimodal investigations to identify the response predictors and the mechanistic basis of modified ECT in this population. Methods: One hundred consenting schizophrenia patients with resistance/intolerance to clozapine referred by clinicians for ECT would be randomly assigned to receive true ECT or sham ECT at three study centers. Sham ECT would mimic all the procedures of modified ECT including anaesthesia and muscle relaxation, except the electrical stimulation. After a blinded course, non-responders to sham ECT would be offered open-label true ECT. Clinical assessments, neurocognitive assessments and multimodal investigations (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], electroencephalography, heart rate variability, investigative transcranial magnetic stimulation-transcranial direct current stimulation, gene polymorphism) would be conducted at baseline and repeated after the end of the trial, as well as open-label ECT course. The trial would evaluate the improvement in positive symptoms (scale for assessment of positive symptoms) of schizophrenia as the primary outcome measure with prediction of this change by resting-state functional-MRI based brain-connectivity as the second primary objective. Registration: Clinical Trial Registry of India (Reg no: CTRI/2021/05/033775) on 24 th May 2021.

The Effectiveness of Three Regimens of Sedation for Children Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Clinical Study.

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) under sedation requires faster recovery for early discharge and feeding resumption in children with neuropsychiatric disorders. The use of dexmedetomidine alone results in delayed recovery. Propofol, when used alone, can cause hypotension and respiratory depression. A new regimen for sedation was evaluated by exploiting the properties of these drugs, to allow faster recovery with minimal adverse events. Materials and Methods: One hundred and fifty children aged 2-12 years requiring MRI were randomly allocated to these three groups. Group P (n = 50) received propofol bolus at 2 mg.kg-1 over 10 min followed by infusion at 100 µg.kg-1.min-1. Group D (n = 50) received dexmedetomidine bolus of 2 µg.kg-1 over 10 min followed by infusion at 1 µg.kg-1.h-1. Group PD (n = 50) received propofol bolus at 2 mg.kg-1 over 10 min followed by dexmedetomidine infusion at 1 µg.kg-1.h-1. Recovery characteristics were noted. Results: Recovery following sedation in Group PD (15 ± 7.0 min) and Group P (17.35 ± 7.4 min) were comparable and significantly (P = 0.03) lesser than Group D (27.58 ± 8.09 min). Emergence delirium scores were significantly less in Group PD (5 ± 1.08) and Group D (5.6 ± 2.4), unlike scores in Group P (9 ± 2.43). About 79.5% (39/49) of children in Group P, 88.2% (45/51) of children in Group D, and 86% (43/50) of children in Group PD completed MRI without any movement. Seven (14.58%) in Group P, 2 (4%) in Group D, and 5 (10.20%) in Group PD required rescue sedation. Conclusion: The regimen with propofol bolus and dexmedetomidine infusion provided adequate sedation and better recovery characteristics in children aged 2-12 years without systemic complications, as compared to the use of either agent alone.

Effect of Opioid Versus Non-Opioid Analgesia on Surgical Pleth Index and Biomarkers of Surgical Stress During Neurosurgery for Brain Tumors: Preliminary Findings.

BACKGROUND: Stress response to surgery is mediated by the sympathetic nervous system and manifests as changes in hemodynamic and neuroendocrine parameters. Recently, the surgical pleth index (SPI) is employed for objective and continuous monitoring of nociceptive response during surgery. Opioids are the mainstay of managing stress response to nociception during the perioperative period. However, due to the well-known adverse effects of opioids, α2 agonists are increasingly used to ablate stress response and reduce opioid usage. OBJECTIVES: This study compared SPI and biomarkers of surgical stress between opioid (fentanyl) and non-opioid (dexmedetomidine) analgesia during craniotomy. METHODS: Patients aged 18 to 60 years undergoing elective craniotomies for brain tumor resection under general anesthesia were randomized to receive fentanyl 1 µg/kg/h or dexmedetomidine 0.5 µ/kg/h infusion as the primary intraoperative analgesic. Our objective was to compare SPI and biomarkers of surgical stress-serum cortisol, blood glucose, arterial pH, and leucocyte count between the two groups. RESULTS: Data of all 24 patients recruited into the study were analyzed. There was no difference in the demographic parameters between the groups. The SPI remained similar with both the drugs over various time points during the study period. There was no difference between the groups in the biomarkers of surgical stress-cortisol, blood glucose, and pH while leucocyte count was higher in the fentanyl group. CONCLUSIONS: The stress response to surgery during craniotomy for brain tumors is similar with opioid (fentanyl) and non-opioid (dexmedetomidine) analgesia as assessed by SPI and blood markers such as cortisol, glucose, and pH.

Effect of Intra-arterial Nimodipine on Cerebral Oxygen Saturation and Systemic Hemodynamic Indices in Patients With Cerebral Vasospasm: A Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Intra-arterial nimodipine (IaN) is used in the management of cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). The impact of IaN therapy on regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rScO2) assessed by near infra-red spectroscopy, and dynamic cardiac indices, is currently unknown. This study assessed the effect of IaN on rScO2 and systemic hemodynamic indices during IaN therapy for cerebral vasospasm after aSAH. METHODS: This prospective cohort study was conducted in 20 patients over sixteen month period after ethics committee approval and informed consent. Patients with angiographic evidence of vasospasm received IaN 3mg over 30 minutes in the spastic vessels. Data regarding rScO2 heart rate (HR), mean blood pressure (MBP) cardiac index (CI), stroke volume index (SVI), stroke volume variation (SVV), and total peripheral resistance index (TPRI) were collected during IaN treatment. The primary outcome measure was change in rScO2 after IaN therapy. RESULTS: There was no significant change from baseline in ipsilateral and contralateral rScO2 after IaN administration (mean difference [MD], 0.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.1 to 1.6; P=0.804, and 1.3; -1.1 to 3.8; P=0.276, respectively). There was a significant decrease in MBP and TPRI (MD, -12.4; 95% CI, -6.6 to -18.2; P<0.001, and -674.3; -374.9 to -973.7; P<0.001, respectively) and increase in SVI and CI (MD, 7.5; 95% CI, 14.4 to 0.6; P=0.035 and 0.7; 0.9 to 0.4; P<0.001, respectively) after IaN therapy. HR and SVV were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: IaN for aSAH-related cerebral vasospasm did not improve rScO2 but was associated with significant systemic hemodynamic effects, including a decrease in MBP and TPRI. These hemodynamic changes might offset any potential effects of IaN to improve rScO2.

Comparison of intraoperative fentanyl with dexmedetomidine for perioperative analgesia and opioid consumption during craniotomies: A randomised controlled pilot study with non-inferiority design.

BACKGROUND: Moderate to severe pain is common despite the use of potent opioids during craniotomies. Non-opioid agents such as dexmedetomidine reduce undesirable opioid effects and are successfully used as primary analgesic during bariatric surgeries. This study assessed the feasibility of conducting a large randomised controlled trial comparing fentanyl with dexmedetomidine for perioperative analgesia during craniotomy. METHODS: This was a prospective single-centre randomised controlled feasibility trial. Twenty-four consenting adult patients undergoing supratentorial craniotomy at NIMHANS, Bangalore, India, were recruited after ethical approval in March and April 2018. They received either fentanyl 1 µg kg-1  h-1 (n = 12) or dexmedetomidine 0.5  µg kg-1  h-1 (n = 12) as primary intraoperative analgesic drug. Patient, anaesthesiologist, outcome assessor and data analyst were blinded to the study intervention. Our feasibility outcomes (primary) were recruitment and adherence rates. We also explored the potential efficacy of intervention and adverse events. RESULTS: We recruited 24 out of 30 eligible patients and had 100% protocol adherence, thereby demonstrating the feasibility of a larger randomised controlled trial. All 24 patients completed the study. The demographic and clinical parameters were similar between the groups. Compared between fentanyl and dexmedetomidine, there was no difference in the intraoperative fentanyl (top-up) consumption (µg), expressed as median and interquartile range: 25 (0-50) and 0 (0-50); P = 0.844; and no difference in postoperative pain at 15 and 60 minutes. Adverse events were few and similar with fentanyl and dexmedetomidine. CONCLUSIONS: A large-scale randomised controlled trial of perioperative dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl is feasible. Dexmedetomidine has the potential to be non-inferior to fentanyl for perioperative analgesia during craniotomies.

Perioperative Management of Pediatric Giant Supratentorial Tumors: Challenges and Management Strategies.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial tumors are the most common pediatric solid tumors. Only one-third of these tumors arise from the supratentorial compartment. The abnormal intracranial tumors are unusual but can bleed to an extent causing hemorrhagic shock necessitating blood transfusion in the perioperative period. The perioperative management of these subset of patients poses a unique challenge to both the neurosurgeons and the neuroanesthetic team. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included a case series of 30 patients with giant supratentorial neoplasms who underwent craniotomy and tumor resection from 2014 to 2017 in our Tertiary Care Institute. The clinical data were collected from the patient's records obtained from the Department of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bangalore, Karnataka, India. The aim of this case series was to characterize the perioperative challenges, management strategies, course, and outcome in 30 children who were operated for elective or emergency resection of giant supratentorial lesions in our hospital. We also reviewed the literature available to guide the anesthetic management of pediatric patients with intracranial tumors. RESULTS: Among the 30 patients, four had significant intraoperative fluid shifts necessitating massive blood transfusion perioperatively. The overall incidence of mortality in our study cohort was 16.67% (5/30). CONCLUSION: The maintenance of systemic physiological homeostasis by anticipation of complications, vigilant monitoring, and prompt resuscitation is critical to foster favorable outcomes in unison with optimal and safe surgical extirpation of the primary cerebral lesion.

Airway Dimensions in Children with Neurological Disabilities During Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Sedation for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

OBJECTIVE: Children with neurological disabilities are at an increased risk of airway complications during anaesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with spontaneous respiration. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate airway dimensions during propofol and dexmedetomidine sedation for MRI in children with neurological disabilities. The secondary objective was to examine the adverse respiratory and sedation-related events. METHODS: Seventy-two children aged 1-6 years undergoing MRI were randomly selected to receive sedation with either 2 mg kg-1 h-1 of propofol or 2 µg kg-1 h-1 of dexmedetomidine. The airway dimensions were measured at soft palate, the base of tongue and mid-epiglottis. Adverse airway events were noted, and the quality of sedation was determined based on the need for dose modification, patient movement and repeat imaging requirements. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in airway dimensions observed between the dexmedetomidine and propofol groups, except for maximum and minimum transverse diameter (15.4±3.4 vs. 13.4±4.7, p=0.04 and 14.6±3.3 vs. 12.4±4.7, p=0.02 respectively) at soft palate and for cross sectional area difference at the base of tongue (14.5±13.9 vs. 20.1±19.3, p=0.03). Airway obstruction (2/36 vs. 3/36), apnoea (0/36 vs. 3/36) and desaturation (0/36 vs 2/36) occurred less frequently with dexmedetomidine. Additional requirement of sedation (6 vs. 3 patients; p=0.48), movement during imaging (9 vs. 5 patients; p=0.37) and poor image quality necessitating re-acquisition (4 vs. 0 patients; p=0.08) were more frequent with propofol. CONCLUSION: Airway dimensions were similar during dexmedetomidine and propofol sedation, except for the transverse diameters at soft palate, and for cross-sectional area difference at the base of tongue in spontaneously breathing children with neurological disabilities. Airway complications were less frequent and the quality of sedation was better with dexmedetomidine.

Duration of Pupillary Unresponsiveness to Light: A Physiological Adjunct to Electroencephalography and Motor Seizure Duration Monitoring During Electroconvulsive Therapy.

BACKGROUND: During electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) sessions, we observed that the time taken for the return of pupillary response to light (ROPL) outlasted both the electroencephalography (EEG) and the motor seizure duration after the delivery of the electrical stimulus to produce convulsions. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate whether ROPL can be used as a marker of cessation of seizure activity in the brain after ECT and also to study the effect of atropine premedication on seizure activity during ECT. METHODS: Forty-one patients underwent 82 sessions of ECT in a cross-over design study. The duration of motor seizure, EEG seizure, and time for ROPL was observed and compared. RESULTS: The ROPL consistently outlasted EEG and motor seizures; the difference in their mean durations was statistically significant P < 0.05. There was good correlation among the 3 parameters. Atropine premedication did not alter the seizure activity and ROPL after ECT. CONCLUSIONS: The ROPL after ECT stimulus is a good bedside monitor for termination of seizure activity and can be a valuable adjunct to surface EEG in monitoring the duration of epileptic activity after delivery of ECT.

Cerebral Oxygen Saturation During Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Crossover Trial.

BACKGROUND: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) causes acute changes in cerebral perfusion and oxygenation. Near-infrared spectroscopy is a novel, noninvasive technique to assess cerebral oxygen saturation (cSO2). We hypothesized that cSO2 increases during ECT and more so with atropine premedication and decreases when systemic desaturation (peripheral oxygen saturation <90%) occurs during ECT. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of a randomized trial of patients undergoing ECT for psychiatric illness during a 6-month period. During the second ECT session, patients were randomly assigned to receive either 0.01 mg/kg IV atropine or no atropine. During the third ECT session, patients were crossed over. Standard anesthetic management was performed. Data with regard to heart rate, blood pressure, peripheral oxygen saturation, and cSO2 were collected at baseline and continuously examined for 5 minutes from delivery of ECT stimulus. RESULTS: Forty-one patients underwent 82 ECT sessions. ECT resulted in significant increase in cSO2 during both the atropine and the no-atropine sessions (P<0.001 for both) but no between-session difference was observed (mean difference, 1.9±2.0; 95% confidence interval, -2.0, 5.9; P=0.337). The cSO2 values were lower in patients who developed systemic desaturation when compared with the cSO2 values in those who did not (mean difference, 5.0±2.6; 95% confidence interval -0.1, 10.2; P=0.054). However, the mean cSO2 was >60% at any measured time point, even in those with systemic desaturation. CONCLUSIONS: ECT increased cSO2 irrespective of atropine premedication. cSO2 was lower when systemic desaturation occurred. Future studies should explore the effect of cerebral oxygenation changes during ECT on outcome of psychiatric conditions.

Effect of Atropine Premedication on Cardiac Autonomic Function During Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Randomized Crossover Study.

OBJECTIVES: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) results in significant cardiovascular changes. The acute cardiac autonomic changes during ECT remain unexplored. The primary objective of this study was to compare autonomic dysfunction with and without atropine premedication during ECT and secondarily to evaluate dysautonomia across psychiatric diagnoses before and after ECT. METHODS: In this crossover study, 41 psychiatric patients were monitored during 82 ECT sessions. Patients were randomized either to receive atropine or not to receive atropine during their second ECT session and were crossed over during their third session. Heart rate, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation were continuously monitored from stimulus application until 300 seconds after ECT. Demographic characteristics and ANSiscope indices derived pre- and post-ECT were collected. RESULTS: Autonomic dysfunction (%) before ECT was similar between atropine and no-atropine sessions (32.4 ± 15.7 vs 32.8 ± 16.7; 95% confidence interval, -7.6 to 6.7; P = 0.90) but increased significantly after ECT to 60.9 ± 16.3 and to 47.0 ± 17.3, respectively, and this difference was significant (95% confidence interval, 6.5-21.3; P < 0.001). There was no difference in the autonomic function across psychiatric diagnoses both before (P = 0.07) and after ECT (P = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac autonomic dysfunction worsens after ECT in patients with psychiatric illnesses and to a significantly greater extent with atropine premedication. The degree of dysautonomia is similar across various psychiatric diagnoses both before and after ECT. Atropine premedication during ECT should be restricted to select patients susceptible to bradyarrhythmia and could be avoided in others.