RESUMO
Implementing comprehensive health promotion programs in the school setting can be challenging, as schools can be considered complex adaptive systems. As a first step towards understanding what works in improving implementation for which schools and under which conditions, this study aimed to examine the degree of implementation of health promoting school (HPS) programs, in terms of five dimensions of fidelity (adherence, dose, participant responsiveness, quality of delivery and program differentiation), and the dimensions of adaptation and integration. The HPS Implementation Questionnaire was distributed amongâ ±â 2400 primary, secondary, secondary vocational and special needs schools in the Netherlands. Employees of 535 schools (22.3%) filled out the questionnaire. Data were analysed by descriptive statistics and ANOVA tests. The average degree of implementation was 2.55 (SDâ =â 0.58, rangeâ =â 0.68-3.90; scaled 0-4). The lowest scores were achieved for participant responsiveness and adherence, and the highest for integration and adaptation. Schools that identified as HPS reported significantly higher overall degree of implementation, adherence, dose, participant responsiveness, program differentiation and adaptation than schools that didn't. Primary schools achieved a significantly higher degree of implementation, dose, participant responsiveness, quality of delivery and integration than other school types. In conclusion, many schools work on student health and well-being to some extent, but the vast majority have much room for improvement. Higher implementation scores for schools that identified as HPS underline the value of HPS programs. A broader perspective on health and more insight into conditions for effectiveness and implementation in secondary and secondary vocational schools are needed.
Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde Escolar , Instituições Acadêmicas , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Implementation of Health Promoting School (HPS) programs can be challenging due to the dynamic school context. Navigating between program fidelity and adaptation, as well as integrating the program, is essential for successful implementation, and consequently, for program effects. As part of an evaluation study in the Netherlands, this study aimed to develop a measurement instrument that differentiates schools according to fidelity, adaptation, and integration of HPS implementation. METHODS: This study presents the development and psychometric evaluation of the 28-item HPS Implementation Questionnaire, covering 7 dimensions: adherence, dose, participant responsiveness, quality of delivery, program differentiation, adaptation, and integration. The questionnaire, to be filled out by school employees, was developed for primary, secondary, secondary vocational, and special needs education, in close collaboration with experts (n = 54) in school health promotion. RESULTS: Semi-structured interviews aimed at dimension clarification resulted in a list of 58 items. Items were revised, combined, and/or removed based on quantitative and qualitative feedback by the evaluation study's Community of Practice, 2-round expert consultation, and pre-tests. Psychometric evaluation (n = 535 schools), consisting of calculating Cronbach's α and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), confirmed internal consistency (α > .72) and the 7-dimension framework. CONCLUSION: The brief yet comprehensive HPS Implementation Questionnaire offers possibilities for research into HPS implementation in various educational sectors and contexts, as well as self-monitoring by individual schools. This study provides first evidence for internal consistency and validity of the questionnaire.