Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 81(6): 792-5, 2007 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17505491

RESUMO

Medicine, including the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries as well as many clinical practitioners, has recognized the importance of using molecular imaging biomarkers, including those labeled in such a way as to be imaged by positron emission tomography (PET), as tools for predicting outcomes in drug development and creating opportunities for "personalized" medicine, for diagnosing early-stage disease, and for the follow-up of the effectiveness of treatment.(1) However, only one important and widely used PET biomarker is currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). If the technology is so important, we can ask why there is such a limitation to the availability of these biomarkers.


Assuntos
Farmacologia Clínica/métodos , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons/métodos , Radioisótopos/química , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos/química , Didesoxinucleosídeos/química , Didesoxinucleosídeos/farmacocinética , Aprovação de Drogas , Radioisótopos de Flúor , Fluordesoxiglucose F18/química , Fluordesoxiglucose F18/farmacocinética , Humanos , Misonidazol/química , Misonidazol/farmacocinética , Estrutura Molecular , Nitrilas/química , Nitrilas/farmacocinética , Radioisótopos/farmacocinética , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos/farmacocinética , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA