Lack of evidence of sexual transmission of hepatitis C among monogamous couples: results of a 10-year prospective follow-up study.

The risk of sexual transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection was evaluated among 895 monogamous heterosexual partners of HCV chronically infected individuals in a long-term prospective study, which provided a follow-up period of 8,060 person-years. Seven hundred and seventy-six (86.7%) spouses were followed for 10 yr, corresponding to 7,760 person-years of observation. One hundred and nineteen (13.3%) spouses (69 whose infected partners cleared the virus following treatment and 50 who ended their relationship or were lost at follow-up) contributed an additional 300 person-years. All couples denied practicing anal intercourse or sex during menstruation, as well as condom use. The average weekly rate of sexual intercourse was 1.8. Three HCV infections were observed during follow-up corresponding to an incidence rate of 0.37 per 1,000 person-years. However, the infecting HCV genotype in one spouse (2a) was different from that of the partner (1b), clearly excluding sexual transmission. The remaining two couples had concordant genotypes, but sequence analysis of the NS5b region of the HCV genome, coupled with phylogenetic analysis showed that the corresponding partners carried different viral isolates, again excluding the possibility of intraspousal transmission of HCV. Our data indicate that the risk of sexual transmission of HCV within heterosexual monogamous couples is extremely low or even null. No general recommendations for condom use seem required for individuals in monogamous partnerships with HCV-infected partners.

[Locoregional treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison between percutaneous alcohol administration and intraarterial chemoembolization]. / Trattamento locoregionale del carcinoma epatocellulare: confronto tra alcolizzazione percutanea e chemioembolizzazione intrarteriosa.

Between 1991 and 1998, 45 cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (1 or 2 lesions smaller than 5 cm) were treated either with percutaneous ethanol injection (26 patients) or with trans arterial chemoembolization (19 patients) in our Department. Percutaneous ethanol injection was performed on 37 nodules: mean diameter of 3.1 +/- 0.8 cm. Transarterial chemoembolization was performed on 27 nodules: mean diameter of 2.8 +/- 0.7 cm. Therapeutic success at first treatment was obtained in 81.5% of percutaneous ethanol injection treated lesions and in 60.0% of trans arterial chemoembolization treated lesions. Local recurrence after first treatment occurred in 7 of 22 percutaneous ethanol injection patients (31.8%) and 8 of 15 transarterial chemoembolization patients (53.3%). Distant hepatic recurrence after first treatment occurred in 16 of 26 (61.5%) alcolization treated patients and in 14 of 25 (56.0%) chemoembolization treated. Multivariate analysis selected therapeutic success and modality of treatment as the best predictor of better survival probability in all treated patients. Survival probability at 12/24/36/48 months was 96.1/80.8/61.6/42.3% in percutaneous ethanol injection group and 89.5/68.4/36.8/15.8% in transarterial chemoembolization group (p < 0.05 Log rank). Few data are available comparing the efficacy of percutaneous ethanol injection and transarterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Our data confirm that percutaneous ethanol injection is better than trans arterial chemoembolization in the treatment of patients with one or two lesions of hepatocellular carcinoma.