Inflammation in obese children and adolescents: Association with psychosocial stress variables and effects of a lifestyle intervention.

Obesity in childhood and adolescence is a complex health issue that has detrimental effects on the physical and psychological health of the youngster, both in the short and long term. A characteristic of obesity is the associated chronic low-grade inflammation which can result in insulin resistance. Previous research suggested that biomarkers referring to such increased inflammation may help in understanding resistance to weight loss. Whether and how psychosocial factors are related with inflammation remains to be proven. The current study consisted of 594 children and adolescents (7-19 years), of whom 480 had follow-up data, who enrolled for a ten-month inpatient multidisciplinary obesity treatment consisting of healthy food routines, physical activities and psychological treatment. The purpose of the study was to explore (1) the relationship between inflammation and psychosocial stress variables (i.e., depressive symptoms, eating behavior, concerns about eating/shape/weight, insecure parent-child attachment) (correlational and multiple regression analysis), (2) whether a lifestyle intervention for obese youngsters results in decreased C-reactive protein (CRP) values (paired t-test) and (3) which psychosocial variables influence this CRP change as indication of treatment success (multiple regression analysis with change in BMI as control variable). Results showed that the psychosocial stress variables emotional eating, external eating and attachment anxiety are related to higher CRP values. Our data further suggested that a lifestyle intervention decreases the CRP values. This significant reduction in blood inflammatory marker was besides being influenced by weight loss also dependent on psychosocial variables, more specific on self-reported attachment avoidance, as this latter was related to less CRP decrease.

Is there stress eating in children and adolescents? A first validation of the Dutch version of the Salzburg Stress Eating Scale.

The recently developed Salzburg Stress Eating Scale (SSES) is the first to specifically address the relationship of stress experiences and coping failure on the one hand and increases or decreases in food intake on the other hand. The SSES demonstrated good psychometric properties in English and German speaking adult samples. However, it has not been applied to younger age groups, which may differ in their expression and reporting of stress related eating behavior. Therefore, the current study evaluated the psychometric properties and correlates of the SSES in a Dutch speaking community sample of adolescents (study 1; N = 244, 9-18 years, adjusted BMI range = 71-189%, M = 103%) and in an inpatient sample of adolescents with obesity (study 2; N = 100, 9-16 years, adjusted BMI range = 151-310%, M = 194.5%). Factor analysis confirmed the original one factor structure in both studies. Internal consistency was 0.85 in study 1 and 0.90 in study 2 (Cronbach's alpha). In both the obesity and community sample, SSES scores were positively correlated with other eating-related measures (e.g., emotional eating, external eating), and uncorrelated with non-eating-related wellbeing measures (e.g., perceived stress, depressive symptoms). Unexpectedly, however, no association with adjusted BMI was found in the community sample, obesity sample, or combined sample. The scores of the obesity sample were also compared to the community sample in an age and sex-matched subsample of study 1. Against our hypothesis, the obesity sample did not report higher SSES scores than the community sample. The good internal consistency and the evidence for convergent and discriminant validity indicate that the Dutch version of the SSES seems useful in examining this clinically important eating behavior in adolescents. However, validity with regard to stress eating and BMI remains to be further explored.