Health Profile and Health Care Access of Mexican Migration Flows Traversing the Northern Border of Mexico.

BACKGROUND: The health of Latino migrants is most often studied with samples of immigrants settled in the United States or returned migrants in Mexico. We examine health outcomes and health care access of Mexican migrants traversing the Mexican border region to gain a better understanding of migrant health needs as they transition between migration phases. METHODS: We used data from a 2013 probability survey of migrants from Northbound and Southbound migration flows in Tijuana, Mexico (N=2412). Respondents included Northbound migrants with and without US migration experience, Southbound migrants returning home from the United States or the Mexican border region, and migrants returning to Mexico via deportation. Descriptive statistics and regression models were estimated to characterize and compare their health status, behavioral health, and health care access across migration phases. RESULTS: Northbound migrants with US migration experience, Southbound migrants from the United States, and deported migrants had worse levels of health insurance, health care utilization, and diabetes than Northbound migrants without US migration experience. Southbound migrants returning from the border reported worse self-rated health and deportees had higher odds of reported substance use compared with Northbound migrants without US migration experience. CONCLUSIONS: Mexican migrants' health profile and health care access vary significantly across migration flows and generally are worse for migrants with US migration experience. The results add to our understanding of Mexican migrant health along the migration continuum and can inform services in sending, receiving, and intermediate communities.

Acute coronary syndrome: factors affecting time to arrival in a diverse urban setting.

This study seeks to better understand how individuals of different cultural/ethnic backgrounds in an urban setting assess the signs and symptoms of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) and the ensuing decision to take urgent action. Few studies exist which examine these differences and enhance understanding of how to address these differences and, ultimately, reduce morbidity and mortality from ACS. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with a convenience sample of urban patients of different cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds regarding their actions upon recognition of ACS signs and symptoms. Patients (423) with presumed or diagnosed ACS were interviewed within 12 h of arrival at the urban emergency rooms. Among the different cultural groups, Haitians delayed the longest (median) from symptom onset to hospital arrival (8.24 h), followed by Caribbeans (7.83 h), African Americans (6.62 h) and Hispanics (6.00 h). Although these delay intervals were not statistically significant across groups, each racial/ethnic group sought care well beyond the recommended time period of 3 h after initial recognition of ACS signs and symptoms. Among all the cultural groups, the two key factors motivating early arrival were being employed and taking positive actions. ACS symptom perception by different cultural groups appears to play an important role in the decision to seek emergency treatment. This is an area that has not been widely studied among or within different cultural/ethnic groups. As such, further research is needed to delineate these concepts and actions and to provide opportunities for appropriate education.