Impact of the assessment of early cleavage in a single embryo transfer policy.

The policy of single embryo transfer (SET) adopted for women <36 years old since 1 July 2003, strongly calls for improvement of embryo selection. A total of 196 cycles in which SET was performed were randomly allocated to two groups. In the first group, early cleavage was assessed (ECA) 25 h after insemination. The embryo with the best score that cleaved early, if present, was selected for transfer. In the second group, early cleavage was not assessed (ECNA) and embryo selection was based solely on the embryo score. Ninety-eight cycles were allocated in the ECA and ECNA group respectively. Early cleavage occurred in 64% of cycles and 32.2% of embryos. Patient population and embryo morphology were similar between the two groups, and similar delivery rates were observed (27.6 versus 24.5% respectively in the ECA and ECNA groups). The assessment of early cleavage as additional parameter did not improve the delivery rate in the single embryo transfer policy.

Similar delivery rates in a selected group of patients, for day 2 and day 5 embryos both cultured in sequential medium: a randomized study.

BACKGROUND: The existence of a real benefit of blastocyst transfer is still a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to compare, in a prospective randomized trial, the outcome of day 2 and day 5 transfer of human embryos cultured in an 'in-house' sequential medium. METHODS: A total of 193 cycles from 171 patients with less than four previous IVF cycles, <39 years old and with four or more zygotes on day 1, were randomly allocated to day 2 (94 cycles) or day 5 (99 cycles) transfer. Zygotes were kept in fertilization medium until 18 h post-fertilization and then placed in a 'glucose-free' cleavage medium. Embryos allocated for day 5 transfer were placed in a blastocyst medium 66 h post-fertilization. Two or three embryos were replaced according to the morphology. RESULTS: A mean (+/- SEM) number of 2.1 +/- 0.4 and 1.9 +/- 0.3 embryos were replaced on day 2 and day 5 (P < 0.001) respectively. Delivery rates per transfer were 44.1 and 37.1% [P = not significant (NS)], implantation rates were 31.4 and 29.4% (NS) and multiple delivery rates 22 and 36% (NS) for day 2 and day 5 groups respectively. Ten patients (10.1%) had no blastocysts available for transfer. CONCLUSIONS: No clear benefits were observed using blastocyst transfer for patients aged <39 years who had had less than four previous IVF cycle attempts.