Impact of Vitamin D Deficiency on Tumor Aggressiveness in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

Background: The role of vitamin D (25(OH)D) in the pathogenesis and outcome of several conditions, including autoimmune diseases, diabetes and cancers is largely described in the literature. The aims of this study were to evaluate the prevalence of 25(OH)D deficit in a cohort of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) in comparison to a matched healthy control group and to analyze the possible role of 25(OH)D as a prognostic factor for NENs in terms of biological aggressiveness, tumor progression and survival. Methods: From 2009 to 2023, 172 patients with NENs (99 females; median age, 63 years) were included in the study. Serum 25(OH)D levels were defined as deficient if ≤20 ng/mL. The possible associations between 25(OH)D levels and disease grading, staging, ki67%, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were considered. Results: NEN patients had significantly lower 25(OH)D levels compared to controls (p < 0.001) regardless of the primary origin. Patients with 25(OH)D < 20 ng/mL had a significantly higher ki67 index (p = 0.02) compared to the ones with 25(OH)D levels above 20 ng/mL. Patients with disease progression were found to have a significantly lower 25(OH)D at baseline (p = 0.02), whereas PFS and OS were not significantly influenced by 25(OH)D. Conclusions: Vitamin D deficiency is highly prevalent among NENs and is associated with higher ki67 and disease progression. Our study highlights the importance of monitoring 25(OH)D levels in patients with NENs, as its deficiency appeared to be linked to the worst biological tumor aggressiveness.

Proteasome inhibitors in medullary thyroid carcinoma: time to restart with clinical trials?

Introduction: Medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) is a rare thyroid tumour whose management in advanced stages is challenging, despite effective therapeutic options having expanded in recent years. Proteasome inhibitors (PrIn) have shown the ability to improve patient outcomes, including survival and quality of life, in several malignancies, due to their ability to impair cell proliferation and cause apoptosis through the inhibition of the proteasome activity. Consequently, these drugs could represent a useful tool, alone or in combination with other treatments, in MTC patients. Aim of the study: This review aims to summarize the available in vitro and in vivo data about the role of PrIn in MTC. Materials and methods: We performed an extensive search for relevant data sources, including full-published articles in international online databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus), preliminary reports in selected international meeting abstract repositories, and short articles published as supplements of international meetings, by using the following terms: medullary thyroid carcinoma, proteasome inhibitors, bortezomib, carfilzomib, ixazomib, delanzomib, marizomib, oprozomib, and MG132. Additionally, we conducted with the same keywords, an in-depth search in registered clinical trials repositories. Results: Our search revealed in vitro studies in human and murine MTC cell lines, based on the use of PrIns, both alone and in combination with other anticancer drugs, and two pertinent clinical trials. Conclusion: We found a strong discrepancy between the evidence of PrIns effects in preclinical studies, and the scarcity or early interruption of clinical trials. We might speculate that difficulties in enrolling patients, as happens in other rare diseases, may have discouraged trials' implementation in favor of drugs already approved for MTC. However, given the concrete improvement in the comprehension of the molecular basis of PrIn effects in MTC, new clinical trials with accurate inclusion criteria of enrollment might be warranted, in order to ascertain whether this treatment, alone or in combination with other drugs, could indeed represent an option to enhance the therapeutic response, and to ultimately improve patients' outcome and survival.

"Present and future of immunotherapy in Neuroendocrine Tumors".

Immunotherapy, so promising in many neoplasms, still does not have a precise role in the treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). In this article, we provide an overview on the current knowledge about immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) applied to NENs, evaluating future perspectives in this setting of tumors.Evidence so far available for ICIs in gastroenteropancreatic (GEP)-NENs is definitively not as robust as for other tumors such as Small Cell Lung Cancer or Merkel Cell Carcinoma. In fact, with regard to the well-differentiated forms of NENs (NETs), the results obtained nowadays have been disappointing. However, the near future, might reserve interesting results for ICIs in GEP-NEN from a total of nine different ICI drugs, used throughout 19 randomised controlled trials. Such numbers highlight the growing attention gathering around NENs and ICIs, in response to the need of stronger evidences supporting such therapy.For the future, the most important aspect will be to study strategies that can make NETs more susceptible to response to ICI and, thus, enhance the effectiveness of these treatments. Therefore, the combination of conventional therapy, target therapy and immunotherapy deserve attention and warrant to be explored. A sequential chemotherapy, possibly inducing an increase in tumor mutational burden and tested before immunotherapy, could be a hypothesis deserving more consideration. A radiation treatment that increases tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, could be another approach to explore before ICIs in NENs. Equally essential will be the identification of biomarkers useful for selecting patients potentially responsive to this type of treatment.