Three dimensional radiation dosimetry in lung-equivalent regions by use of a radiation sensitive gel foam: proof of principle.

A polymer hydrogel foam is proposed as a potential three dimensional experimental dosimeter for radiation treatment verification in low-density tissue such as the lung. A gel foam is created by beating a radiation sensitive polymer gel mixture in an anoxic atmosphere. The mass density of the gel foam is in the order of 0.25-0.35 kg/dm3. Both nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spin-spin relaxation rate (R2) and magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) have been used to map the dose distribution from the gel dosimeter. It is found that MTR has significant advantages compared to R2 for mapping the dose distribution in the polymer gel foam dosimeters. The magnetization transfer ratio is found to be less dependent on the density and microstructure of the gel foam dosimeter while spin-spin relaxation dispersion has been observed making the spin-spin relaxation rate dependent on the interecho time interval. Optical microscopy reveals a microstructure that shows great similarity with human lung tissue. It is also shown how NMR hydrogen proton density measurements can be used to map the density distributions in gel dosimeters.

Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) for rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: In rectal cancer, combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy, either pre- or postoperatively, is an accepted treatment. Late small bowel (SB) toxicity is a feared side effect and limits radiation-dose escalation in a volume-dependent way. A planning strategy for intensity- modulated arc therapy (IMAT) was developed, and IMAT was clinically implemented with the aim to reduce the volume of SB irradiated at high doses and thus reduce SB toxicity. We report on the treatment plans of the first 7 patients, on the comparison of IMAT with conventional 3D planning (3D), and on the feasibility of IMAT delivery. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Seven patients, who were referred to our department for preoperative (n = 4) or postoperative (n = 3) radiotherapy for rectal cancer, gave written consent for IMAT treatment. All patients had a planning CT in prone position. The delineation of the clinical target volume was done after fusion of CT and MRI, with the help of a radiologist. For the IMAT plan, arcs were generated using an anatomy-based segmentation tool. The optimization of the arcs was done by weight optimization (WO) and leaf position optimization (LPO), both of which were adapted for IMAT purposes. The 3D plans used one posterior and two lateral wedged beams, of which the outlines were shaped to the beam's-eye view projection of the planning target volume (PTV). Beam WO was done by constrained matrix inversion. For dose-volume histogram analysis, all plans were normalized to 45 Gy as median PTV dose. Polymer gel dosimetry (PGD) on a humanoid phantom was used for the validation of the total chain (planning to delivery). IMAT treatments were delivered by an Elekta SliPlus linear accelerator using prototype software with the same interlock class as in clinical mode. RESULTS: The IMAT plan resulted in 3 to 6 arcs, with a mean delivery time of 6.3 min and a mean of 456 monitor units (MU) for a 180 cGy fraction. The minimal dose in the PTV was not significantly different between 3D and IMAT plans. Inhomogeneity was highest for the IMAT plans (14.1%) and lowest for the 3D plans (9.9%). Mean dose to the SB was significantly lower for the IMAT plans (12.4 Gy) than for the 3D plans (17.0 Gy). The volume of SB receiving less than any dose level was lower for the IMAT plans than for 3D plans. Integral dose was lower in the IMAT plans than for the 3D plans (respectively 244 J and 262 J to deliver 45 Gy). Differences between the PGD measured dose and the calculated dose were as small for IMAT as for 3D treatments. CONCLUSION: IMAT plans are deliverable within a 5-10-minute time slot, and result in a lower dose to the SB than 3D plans, without creating significant underdosages in the PTV. PGD showed that IMAT delivery is as accurate as 3D delivery.

Whole abdominopelvic radiotherapy (WAPRT) using intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT): first clinical experience.

PURPOSE: Whole abdominopelvic radiation therapy (WAPRT) is a treatment option in the palliation of patients with relapsed ovarian cancer. With conventional techniques, kidneys and liver are the dose- and homogeneity-limiting organs. We developed a planning strategy for intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) and report on the treatment plans of the first 5 treated patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Five consecutive patients with histologically proven relapsed ovarian cancer were sent to our department for WAPRT. The target volumes and organs at risk (OAR) were delineated on 0.5-cm-thick CT slices. The clinical target volume (CTV) was defined as the total peritoneal cavity. CTV and kidneys were expanded with 0.5 cm. In a preset range of 8 degrees interspaced gantry angles, machine states were generated with an anatomy-based segmentation tool. Machine states of the same class were stratified in arcs. The optimization of IMAT was done in several steps, using a biophysical objective function. These steps included weight optimization of machine states, leaf position optimization adapted to meet the maximal leaf speed constraint, and planner-interactive optimization of the start and stop angles. The final control points (machine states plus associated cumulative monitor unit counts) were calculated using a collapsed cone convolution/superposition algorithm. For comparison, two conventional plans (CONV) were made, one with two fields (CONV2), and one with four fields (CONV4). In these CONV plans, dose to the kidneys was limited by cerrobend blocks. The IMAT and the CONV plans were normalized to a median dose of 33 Gy to the planning target volume (PTV). Monomer/polymer gel dosimetry was used to assess the dosimetric accuracy of the IMAT planning and delivery method. RESULTS: The median volume of the PTV was 8306 cc. The mean treatment delivery time over 4 patients was 13.8 min. A mean of 444 monitor units was needed for a fraction dose of 150 cGy. The fraction of the PTV volume receiving more than 90% of the prescribed dose (V(90)) was 9% higher for the IMAT plan than for the CONV4 plan (89.9% vs. 82.5%). Outside a build-up region of 0.8 cm and 1 cm away from both kidneys, the inhomogeneity in the PTV was 15.1% for the IMAT plans and 24.9% for the CONV4 plans (for CONV2 plans, this was 34.9%). The median dose to the kidneys in the IMAT plans was lower for all patients. The 95th percentile dose for the kidneys was significantly higher for the IMAT plans than for the CONV4 and CONV2 plans (28.2 Gy vs. 22.2 Gy and 22.6 Gy for left kidney, respectively). No relevant differences were found for liver. The gel-measured dose was within clinical planning constraints. CONCLUSION: IMAT was shown to be deliverable in an acceptable time slot and to produce dose distributions that are more homogeneous than those obtained with a CONV plan, with at least equal sparing of the OARs.

Application of monomer/polymer gel dosimetry to study the effects of tissue inhomogeneities on intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dose distributions.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: When planning an intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment in a heterogeneous region (e.g. the thorax), the dose computation algorithm of a treatment planning system may need to account for these inhomogeneities in order to obtain a reliable prediction of the dose distribution. An accurate dose verification technique such as monomer/polymer gel dosimetry is suggested to verify the outcome of the planning system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The effects of low-density structures: (a) on narrow high-energy (18 MV) photon beams; and (b) on a class-solution IMRT treatment delivered to a thorax phantom have been examined using gel dosimetry. The used phantom contained air cavities that could be filled with water to simulate a homogeneous or heterogeneous configuration. The IMRT treatment for centrally located lung tumors was delivered on both cases, and gel derived dose maps were compared with computations by both the GRATIS and Helax-TMS planning system. RESULTS: Dose rebuildup due to electronic disequilibrium in a narrow photon beam is demonstrated. The gel measurements showed good agreement with diamond detector measurements. Agreement between measured IMRT dose maps and dose computations was demonstrated by several quantitative techniques. An underdosage of the planning target volume (PTV) was revealed. The homogeneity of the phantom had only a minor influence on the dose distribution in the PTV. An expansion of low-level isodoses in the lung volume was predicted by collapsed cone computations in the heterogeneous case. CONCLUSIONS: For the class-solution described, the dose in centrally located mediastinal tumors can be computed with sufficient accuracy, even when neglecting the lower lung density. Polymer gel dosimetry proved to be a valuable technique to verify dose calculation algorithms for IMRT in 3D in heterogeneous configurations.