How to Support Communication Between Nurses and Residents During Shift Work: A Mixed-Methods Study Into Local Practices and Perceptions.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore local practices and perceptions of effective nurse-resident communication during shifts. Subsequently, effective communication was sought to be reinforced by implementing an initiative for improvement. DESIGN: A mixed-methods study was performed, combining a questionnaire with focus groups. Following qualitative analysis, 3 initiatives for improvement of nurse-resident communication were scrutinized, after which 1 initiative was implemented. Overall contentment with the implementation and effectiveness of communication was reassessed through a questionnaire at 3 months postimplementation. SETTING: This study took place between 2022 and 2023 at the Department of Surgery of the Leiden University Medical Center, a tertiary center in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: All surgical nurses (n = 150) and residents (n = 20) were invited to participate, by responding to the questionnaire and take part in the focus groups. A total of 38 nurses (response rate 25.3%) and 12 residents (60%) completed the questionnaire, and 31 nurses and 13 residents participated in the focus groups. RESULTS: The themes "clarity," "mutual respect," "accessibility" and "approach" were critical for effective communication, in which there were interdisciplinary differences in the interpretation and needs regarding "clarity." In response, structured moments for interdisciplinary consultation during shifts were implemented, which were foremostly useful according to nurses (73.9%), compared to residents (40.0%). A majority of the nurses agreed that communication during shifts improved through fixed moments (60.9%). CONCLUSION: Differences in the perception of critical elements for efficient nurse-resident communication during shifts can be found, which could possibly be explained by differences in training and culture. Mutual awareness for each other's tasks, responsibilities and background seems vital for the ability to deliver good patient care during shifts. To improve interprofessional practice and overcome concerns of quality of care, attention for local practices is imperative. Practical arrangements, such as fixed moments for peer communication, can strengthen partnership during shift work.

Increased Aortic Exclusion in Endovascular Treatment of Complex Aortic Aneurysms.

PURPOSE: Perioperative risk assessments for complex aneurysms are based on the anatomical extent of the aneurysm and do not take the length of the aortic exclusion into account, as it was developed for open repair. Nevertheless, in the endovascular repair (ER) of complex aortic aneurysms, additional segments of healthy aorta are excluded compared with open repair (OR). The aim of this study was to assess differences in aortic exclusion between the ER and OR of complex aortic aneurysms, to subsequently assess the current classification for complex aneurysm repair. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included patients that underwent complex endovascular aortic aneurysm repair by means of fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR), fenestrated and branched EVAR (FBEVAR), or branched EVAR (BEVAR). The length of aortic exclusion and the number of patent segmental arteries were determined and compared per case in ER and hypothetical OR, using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: A total of 71 patients were included, who were treated with FEVAR (n = 44), FBEVAR (n = 8), or BEVAR (n = 19) for Crawford types I (n = 5), II (n = 7), III (n = 6), IV (n = 7), and V (n = 2) thoracoabdominal or juxtarenal (n = 44) aneurysms. There was a significant increase in the median exclusion of types I, II, III, IV, and juxtarenal aneurysms (p < 0.05) in ER, compared with hypothetical OR. The number of patent segmental arteries in the ER of type I-IV and juxtarenal aneurysms was significantly lower than in hypothetical OR (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: There are significant differences in the length of aortic exclusion between ER and hypothetical OR, with the increased exclusion in ER resulting in a lower number of patent segmental arteries. The ER and OR of complex aortic aneurysms should be regarded as distinct modalities, and as each approach deserves a particular risk assessment, future efforts should focus on reporting on the extent of exclusion per treatment modality, to allow for appropriate comparison.

The Morbidity and Mortality Conference: A Century-Old Practice with Ongoing Potential for Future Improvement.

OBJECTIVE: To discuss practical strategies to consider for morbidity and mortality conferences (M&M). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This article reflects on (i) insights that can be drawn from the M&M literature, (ii) practical aspects to consider when organizing M&M, and (iii) possible future directions for development for this long-standing practice for routine reflection. RESULTS: M&M offers the opportunity to learn from past cases in order to improve the care delivered to future patients, thereby serving both educational and quality improvement purposes. For departments seeking to implement or improve local M&M practice, it is difficult that a golden standard or best practice for M&M is nonexistent. This is partly because comparative research on different formats is hampered by the lack of objective outcome measures to evaluate the effectiveness of M&M. Common practical suggestions include the use of (i) a skillful and active moderator; (ii) structured formats for case presentation and discussion; and (iii) a dedicated committee to guide improvement plans that ensue from the meeting. M&M practice is affected by various sociological factors, for which qualitative research methods seem most suitable, but in the M&M literature these are sparsely used. Moreover, aspects influencing an open and blame-free atmosphere underline how local teams should tailor the format to best fit the local context and culture. CONCLUSION: This article presents practice guidance on how to organize and carry out M&M This practice for routine reflection needs to be tailored to the local setting, with attention for various sociological factors that are at play.

Measuring What Matters at Morbidity and Mortality Conferences: A Scoping Review of Effectiveness Measures.

OBJECTIVE: Efforts to study morbidity and mortality conferences (M&MC) are hampered by the lack of rigorous instruments to assess the effectiveness of the conferences for the purpose of quality improvement and medical education. This might limit further advancement of the practice. The aim of this scoping review was to determine commonly used effectiveness measures of M&MC in the literature. METHOD: A scoping review was performed of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies of M&MC, using databases from PubMed, Emcare, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library. Studies were included if an outcome was described after a general evaluation or an intervention to M&MC. Study quality was assessed with the Quality Assessment Tool for Studies with Diverse Designs. RESULTS: A total of 43 articles were included in the review. The majority used a quantitative (n = 23) or mixed (n = 17) design, with surveys as the most frequent method used for data collection (n = 29). The overall Quality Assessment Tool for Studies with Diverse Designs scores were modest (64%). Outcome measures used to evaluate the effectiveness of M&MC were clustered in the following categories: "participant experiences," "characteristics of the meeting," "medical knowledge," "actions for improvement," and "clinical outcomes." CONCLUSIONS: This review found a wide variety of effectiveness measures for M&MC. Rather than using isolated measures, approaches that combine multiple effectiveness measures could offer a more comprehensive assessment of M&MC. Although there was a preference for quantitative metrics, this fails to seize the opportunity of qualitative methods to yield insights into sociological purposes of M&MC, such as building professional identities and safety culture.

Rupture of a Median Sacral Artery Aneurysm in a Patient with Vascular Ehlers Danlos Syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Vascular Ehlers Danlos syndrome is a rare connective tissue disease that is associated with various arterial complications. REPORT: A 25 year old man with vascular Ehlers Danlos syndrome presented with acute lower back pain as a result of a ruptured aneurysm of the median sacral artery (MSA). Prior medical history included several vascular events resulting in a right iliac occlusion. The unusual location of aneurysmal disease of the MSA might be explained by extensive collateral flow recruitment due to this occlusion. CONCLUSION: Previous vascular events inducing collateral recruitment might justify a more frequent follow up in patients with connective tissue disorders.

Taking Morbidity and Mortality Conferences to a Next Level: The Resilience Engineering Concept.

OBJECTIVE: To explore possibilities to improve morbidity and mortality conferences using advancing insights in safety science. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Mortality and Morbidity conferences (M&M) are the golden practice for case-based learning. While learning from complications is useful, M&M does not meet expectations for system-wide improvement. Resilience engineering principles may be used to improve M&M. METHODS: After a review of the shortcomings of traditional M&M, resilience engineering principles are explored as a new way to evaluate performance. This led to the development of a new M&M format that also reviews successful outcomes, rather than only complications. This "quality assessment meeting" (QAM) is presented and the first experiences are evaluated using local observations and a survey. RESULTS: During the QAM teams evaluate all discharged patients, addressing team resilience in terms of surgeons' ability to respond to irregularities and to monitor and learn from experiences. The meeting was feasible to implement and well received by the surgical team. Observations reveal that reflection on both complicated and uncomplicated cases strengthened team morale but also triggered reflection on the entire clinical course. The QAM serves as a tool to identify how adapting behavior led to success despite challenging conditions, so that this resilient performance can be supported. CONCLUSIONS: The resilience engineering concept can be used to adjust M&M, in which learning is focused not only on complications but also on how successful outcomes were achieved despite ever-present challenges. This reveals the actual ratio between successful and unsuccessful outcomes, allowing to learn from both to reinforce safety-enhancing behavior.

Safety and Outcome of Endovascular Treatment in Prestroke-Dependent Patients.

Background and Purpose- Prestroke dependence is an exclusion criterion in most trials of endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke. Little is known about outcomes after EVT in these patients. We compared outcome and safety of EVT between prestroke-dependent and prestroke-independent patients. Methods- We report patients with an anterior circulation occlusion who were included between March 2014 and June 2016 in the MR CLEAN registry (Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke)-a prospective, multicenter, observational study for stroke intervention centers in the Netherlands. Prestroke dependence was defined as modified Rankin Scale score of 3 to 5 before onset of current stroke. Primary outcome was favorable outcome at 90 days, defined as modified Rankin Scale of 0 to 2 or not worsening of the modified Rankin Scale score. Secondary outcomes included National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score post-intervention, reperfusion grade, and safety outcomes. Logistic regression analyses (adjusted for age, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, collaterals, time to EVT, and intravenous thrombolysis before EVT) were used to assess the association between prestroke dependence and outcomes. Results- One thousand four hundred forty-one patients were included in the present study, of whom 157 (11%) were prestroke dependent. Favorable outcome was seen in 27% prestroke-dependent patients, compared with 42% prestroke-independent patients ( P<0.05). After adjustment, prestroke dependence was not associated with less-favorable outcome (ORadjusted, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.58-1.39). The occurrence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and ischemic stroke progression was similar in both groups. Conclusions- A substantial proportion of prestroke-dependent patients will reach prestroke modified Rankin Scale scores after EVT, and complication rates are comparable with prestroke-independent patients. Therefore, prestroke-dependent patients should not be routinely excluded from EVT.

Successful mechanical thrombectomy in a comatose patient with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: A case report.

Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis is a rare cause of stroke, which is routinely treated with systemic heparin. Unfavourable outcome is often seen in severe cases. Therefore alternative treatment methods should be explored in these patients. Due to the risk of haemorrhagic complications, treatment without administration of thrombolytics is of particular interest. This report presents a case of successful mechanical thrombectomy, without the use of thrombolytics, in a comatose patient with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis.

The Value of PDRI and P-PASS as Predictors of Outcome After Pancreas Transplantation in a Large European Pancreas Transplantation Center.

OBJECTIVE: In 2008, the preprocurement pancreas suitability score (P-PASS) was introduced within Eurotransplant to predict suitability of pancreas donors. A P-PASS of 17 or higher would have lower graft survival compared with pancreatic grafts from donors with a P-PASS lower than 17. In 2010, a continuous model, the pancreas donor risk index (PDRI), was designed. Before using this model in the European donor population, it has to be validated in the European setting. METHODS: In this study, P-PASS and PDRI were validated using the results of all pancreas transplants performed at our center. The P-PASS and PDRI were compared as both continuous and dichotomous values. The original cutoff point of 17 divided P-PASS groups. Median PDRI (1.24) divided PDRI groups. RESULTS: In total, 349 pancreas transplantations were performed. The P-PASS of 17 or higher was not associated with graft survival (P = 0.448). The PDRI of 1.24 or higher was associated with reduced graft survival in univariate analysis (P = 0.007) and multivariate analysis (P = 0.002). The PDRI concordance index was 0.69. CONCLUSIONS: The P-PASS has no predictive value for pancreas graft survival and should not be used in clinical decision making. The PDRI is a significant predictor of pancreas graft survival but should be used carefully, because good results can be achieved with grafts from high-PDRI donors.

Thirty Years of Pancreas Transplantation at Leiden University Medical Center: Long-term Follow-up in a Large Eurotransplant Center.

BACKGROUND: An overview of 30 years of pancreas transplantation at a high volume center. Analysis of patient survival- and graft survival-associated risk factors. METHODS: All pancreas transplantations performed in our center from January 1, 1984, till December 31, 2012, were evaluated. Covariates influencing pancreas graft survival were analyzed using both univariate and multivariate analysis and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: In the study period, 349 pancreas transplantations were performed. With the introduction of modern induction therapy in 1999, 5-year patient survival improved to 92.0% (P = 0.003). Five-year pancreas graft survival improved to 80.3% (P = 0.026). Pancreas graft survival was influenced by left or right donor kidney, transplant type, local origin of procurement team, pancreas cold ischemia time, recipient cerebrovascular disease. Pancreas donor risk index increased to 1.39 over the years and pancreas donor risk index 1.24 or higher is a risk factor for graft survival (P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown excellent results in patient and pancreas graft survivals after 30 years of pancreas transplantation in a high volume center. Different donor, transplant, and recipient related risk factors influence pancreas graft survival. Even with higher risk pancreas donors, good results can be achieved.