Recommendations for Diagnosis and Treatment of Odontoid Fractures in Geriatric Patients. / Empfehlungen zu Diagnostik und Behandlung von Frakturen des Dens axis bei geriatrischen Patienten.

BACKGROUND: Odontoid fractures in geriatric patients represent an entity of increasing incidence with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. The optimal diagnostic and therapeutic management is being controversially discussed in the literature. METHODS: In a consensus process and based on the current literature, the members of the working groups "Osteoporotic Fractures" and "Upper Cervical Spine" of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery (DGOU) defined recommendations for the diagnostics and treatment of odontoid fractures in geriatric patients. RESULTS: For the diagnosis of odontoid fractures in symptomatic patients, computed tomography represents the gold standard, along with conventional radiographs. Magnetic resonance and dynamic imaging can be used as ancillary imaging modalities. With regard to fracture classification, the systems described by Anderson/D'Alonzo and by Eysel/Roosen have proved to be of value. A treatment algorithm was developed based on these classifications. Anderson/D'Alonzo type 1, type 3, and non-displaced type 2 fractures usually can be treated non-operatively. However, a close clinical and radiological follow-up is essential. In Anderson/D'Alonzo type 2 fractures, operative treatment is associated with better fracture healing. Displaced type 2 and type 3 fractures should be stabilized operatively. Type 2 fractures with suitable fracture patterns (Eysel/Roosen 2A/B) can be stabilized anteriorly. Posterior C I/II-stabilization procedures are well established and suitable for all fracture patterns.

Treatment of Fractures of the Thoracolumbar Spine: Recommendations of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma (DGOU).

STUDY DESIGN: consensus paper with systematic literature review. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to establish recommendations for treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures based on systematic review of current literature and consensus of several spine surgery experts. METHODS: The project was initiated in September 2008 and published in Germany in 2011. It was redone in 2017 based on systematic literature review, including new AOSpine classification. Members of the expert group were recruited from all over Germany working in hospitals of all levels of care. In total, the consensus process included 9 meetings and 20 hours of video conferences. RESULTS: As regards existing studies with highest level of evidence, a clear recommendation regarding treatment (operative vs conservative) or regarding type of surgery (posterior vs anterior vs combined anterior-posterior) cannot be given. Treatment has to be indicated individually based on clinical presentation, general condition of the patient, and radiological parameters. The following specific parameters have to be regarded and are proposed as morphological modifiers in addition to AOSpine classification: sagittal and coronal alignment of spine, degree of vertebral body destruction, stenosis of spinal canal, and intervertebral disc lesion. Meanwhile, the recommendations are used as standard algorithm in many German spine clinics and trauma centers. CONCLUSION: Clinical presentation and general condition of the patient are basic requirements for decision making. Additionally, treatment recommendations offer the physician a standardized, reproducible, and in Germany commonly accepted algorithm based on AOSpine classification and 4 morphological modifiers.

The endoscopically assisted simultaneous posteroanterior reconstruction of the thoracolumbar spine in prone position.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The reconstruction of the anterior column of the thoracolumbar spine has become more common in the last few years, due largely to the unfavorable results of exclusively posterior surgical treatment, which has been associated with a lack of about 10 degrees of kyphosis correction after removal of the instrumentation. The minimally invasive anterior techniques have reduced the morbidity of the anterior approach significantly. PURPOSE: A minimally invasive technique for anterior stabilization of the spine may reduce the morbidity of the open approach. Irrespective of an anterior open or an endoscopic approach, the posteroanterior instrumentation of thoracolumbar fractures requires time-consuming intraoperative maneuvers to change the patient position from prone to lateral. We describe here a standardized anterior endoscopically assisted approach for the segments T4 to L4. This approach allows the patient to remain in prone position. A 4- to 5-cm incision combined with a retractor system is used. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: In a prospective study, all patients of our clinic who underwent surgery of the thoracolumbar spine between July 1999 and May 2001 were registered. Study criteria were duration of surgery, duration of anesthesia, intra- and postoperative complications. PATIENT SAMPLE: Between July 1999 and May 2001, 42 patients (25 male, 17 female, average age of 41.9 years), who presented with 55 injured spinal levels and underwent surgery of the thoracolumbar spine in prone position, were included. OUTCOME MEASURES: Duration of surgery (posterior/anterior/total), duration of anesthesia, method of instrumentation, intra- and postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay and radiographs were evaluated. METHODS: Surgery was performed in prone position. A thoracic approach was used for instrumentation of T9 to L2. A retroperitoneal approach was used for stabilization of L1 to L5. Both procedures were endoscopically assisted with a new retractor system (Synframe; Synthes GmbH, Umkirch, Germany). In this manner, only an incision 4 to 5 cm long and a stab incision for the endoscope were required. The whole procedure was performed in prone position without a change of position during surgery. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients underwent surgery following this technique: 14 isolated anterior procedures (median duration of surgery, 181 minutes); 13 simultaneous one-stage procedures (median duration of surgery: 210 minutes) and 15 combined two-stage procedures (median duration of surgery: 90 minutes posterior, 120 minutes anterior, 240 minutes posterior+anterior). In the simultaneous posteroanterior procedures, the anterior instrumentation was performed 20 times using one rod, twice using two rods and in six patients simply by bone grafting. No intraoperative complications were observed. In the postoperative course, one case of pneumothorax, one case of hemothorax and one case of transient intercostal neuralgia occurred. CONCLUSION: The approach to the anterior spine in prone position is feasible by using a self-holding retractor system for the region between T4 and L4. The duration of anesthesia for the one-stage simultaneous procedure was reduced by about 40 minutes, because changing the position of the patient is no longer necessary. The minimal incision, in combination with the retractor system, significantly reduces cost by allowing the use of less expensive instruments and implants. The advantages of the open and the endoscopic techniques are combined, while their disadvantages are minimized. The main advantage of the prone position is the opportunity to access the anterior and posterior spine simultaneously, which is especially helpful in reduction maneuvers.