Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eye (Lond) ; 30(3): 426-30, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26611849

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To report outcome of eyes with recalcitrant and naive eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with intravitreal dexamethasone implants (Ozurdex) injection. METHODS: Retrospective multicenter data analysis of eyes with DME treated with Ozurdex implant and with minimum follow-up of at least one year after the first implant. Data collected included demographic details, history of presenting illness, past treatment history, clinical examination details including visual acuity at presentation, and follow-up with imaging and treatment details. Paired sample t-test was used to measure mean differences between pre- and post-implant values obtained at baseline and last follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 79 eyes (62 subjects) were included. Sixty-four eyes had been previously treated; 15 eyes were naive. Among the previously treated eyes, mean interval between first Ozurdex injection and any previous treatment was 7.69±8.2 months. In naive eyes, the visual acuity improved from baseline 0.58±0.25 to 0.44±0.33 logMAR at last follow-up (P=0.05). In eyes that had been previously treated, the improvement was from 0.65±0.34 at baseline to 0.48±0.35 logMAR (P=0.01). Mean treatment-free interval was 6.5±4.5 months. Nine eyes were steroid responder with controlled intraocular pressure (IOP), none showed any spike in IOP during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Ozurdex implant could be a good alternative for recalcitrant as well as naive eyes with DME. The visual gain after initial implant injection was fairly maintained, with additional treatment usually after 6 months in naive eyes. Ozurdex appeared safe even in steroid responders with good control of IOP with antiglaucoma medications.


Assuntos
Dexametasona/administração & dosagem , Retinopatia Diabética/tratamento farmacológico , Implantes de Medicamento , Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem , Edema Macular/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Retinopatia Diabética/diagnóstico , Retinopatia Diabética/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Angiofluoresceinografia , Seguimentos , Humanos , Pressão Intraocular , Injeções Intravítreas , Edema Macular/diagnóstico , Edema Macular/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Acuidade Visual/efeitos dos fármacos
2.
Eur J Ophthalmol ; 18(6): 934-40, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18988165

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To verify the efficacy of nonvisible micropulse diode laser irradiation in the treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). METHODS: Twenty-two patients with CSC for a total of 24 eyes with a disease duration longer than 3 months were included in a prospective study. Patients underwent Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuity (VA) examination, dilated ophthalmoscopy, fluorescein angiography, and optical coherence tomography before treatment and during follow- up. Treatment with a micropulse diode laser was given with a duty cycle of 15%. Multiple spots were placed over and adjacent to the area of retinal pigment epithelium leak or decompensation. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 14 months (range 3-36 months). Powers used ranged from 1 to 2 W (mean 1.35 W). Mean number of spots was 215 (range 90-400). Fourteen eyes were treated once, nine eyes received two to three treatments, and one eye had five treatments during a follow-up of 3 years. Subretinal fluid was resolved or improved in two third of cases 1 month after laser treatment, and in three-quarters at the end of follow-up. Mean retinal thickness was 328 microm, 197 microm, and 168 microm before, 1 month after irradiation, and at the end of follow-up, respectively. No evidence of RPE or retinal changes due to laser treatment were discernible in most of the eyes. Median VA was 20/32 (range 20/100-20/20) before treatment and 20/25 (range 20/200-20/20) at the end of the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Nonvisible micropulse diode laser may have efficacy in the treatment of CSC. A randomized study with larger series is needed.


Assuntos
Doenças da Coroide/cirurgia , Fotocoagulação a Laser/métodos , Lasers Semicondutores/uso terapêutico , Doenças Retinianas/cirurgia , Adulto , Permeabilidade Capilar , Doenças da Coroide/diagnóstico , Doenças da Coroide/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Angiofluoresceinografia , Seguimentos , Humanos , Raios Infravermelhos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oftalmoscopia , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Doenças Retinianas/diagnóstico , Doenças Retinianas/fisiopatologia , Epitélio Pigmentado da Retina/patologia , Epitélio Pigmentado da Retina/cirurgia , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Resultado do Tratamento , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...