Prevalence and management of delirium in intensive care units in the Netherlands: An observational multicentre study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the prevalence, risk factors of delirium and current practice of delirium management in intensive care units of various levels of care. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY/DESIGN: Prospective multicentre cohort study. SETTING: In all adult patients admitted to one of the participating intensive care units on World Delirium Awareness Day 2018, delirium point and period prevalence rates were measured between ICU admission and seven days after the index day. RESULTS: In total, 28 (33%) Dutch intensive care units participated in this study. Point-prevalence was 23% (range 41), and period-prevalence was 42% (range 70). University intensive care units had a significantly higher delirium point-prevalence compared with non-university units (26% vs.15%, p = 0.02). No significant difference were found in period prevalence (50% vs. 39%, p = 0.09). Precipitating risk factors, infection and mechanical ventilation differed significantly between delirium and non-delirium patients. No differences were observed for predisposing risk factors. A delirium protocol was present in 89% of the ICUs. Mean delirium assessment compliance measured was 84% (±19) in 14 units and estimated 59% (±29) in the other 14. CONCLUSION: Delirium prevalence in Dutch intensive care units is substantial and occurs with a large variation, with the highest prevalence in university units. Precipitating risk factors were more frequent in patients with delirium. In the majority of units a delirium management protocol is in place.

Patients suffering from psychological impairments following critical illness are in need of information.

BACKGROUND: Because critical illness survivors frequently experience several long-term psychological impairments altering quality of life after ICU, there is a trend towards increasing follow-up care, mainly via ICU follow-up clinics. Despite these and other initiatives, understanding of patient's post-ICU needs to help them cope with their problems and subsequently improve quality of life is largely lacking. Our aim was therefore to assess the needs, expectations and wishes in ICU survivors to receive information with the purpose to help them better grasp ICU treatment. In addition, we assessed the perceived burden of psychological trauma after ICU treatment and the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) up to 2.5 years after ICU discharge. METHODS: In a multicentre, retrospective cross-sectional cohort study, the needs and preferred intervention methods were assessed using a self-composed inventory in adult mechanically ventilated ICU survivors (n = 43). Additionally, the Impact of Event Scale Revised, the Beck Depression Inventory, the EuroQol-5D-5L, and the Short-Form 12 were used to assess psychological burden and HRQoL. RESULTS: A substantial proportion of all ICU survivors (59%, 95% CI 44% to 74%) suffered from psychological impairments after ICU treatment. Seventy-five percent of these patients expressed a wish to receive information, but only 36% desired to receive this information using a commonly used information brochure. In contrast, 71% of these patients had a wish to receive information using a video film/VR. Furthermore, only 33% of these patients was satisfied with the information provided by their treating hospital. Patients with psychological PICS reported a worse HRQoL as compared to a normative Dutch sample (P < 0.001) and as compared to patients without psychological PICS (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In a Dutch cohort of critical illness survivors, a substantial part of ICU survivors suffer from psychological impairments, such as PTSD and depression, which was associated with a worse HRQoL. These patients are in need of information, have no desire using an information brochure, but are willing to receive information using a video film/virtual reality module. These results support the exploration of such an intervention.

Withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in a mixed intensive care unit: most common in patients with catastropic brain injury.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in various groups of patients in a mixed intensive care unit (ICU). DESIGN: Observational retrospective. SETTING: University hospital mixed medical, neurological, neurosurgical and surgical ICU. PATIENTS: All patients admitted to the ICU between 1 November 2006, and 31 October 2007. RESULTS: 1,353 Patients were admitted to our ICU between 1 November 2006, and 31 October 2007. During this period, 218 (16.1%) patients died in the ICU, 10 of which were excluded for further analysis. In 174 (83.7%) of the remaining 208 patients, life-sustaining treatment was withdrawn. Severe CNS injury was in 86 patients (49.4%) being the reason for withdrawal of treatment, followed by MODS in 67 patients (38.5%). Notably, treatment was withdrawn in almost all patients (95%) who died of CNS failure. Patients who died in the ICU were significantly older, more often admitted for medical than surgical reasons, and had higher SOFA and APACHE II scores compared with those who survived their ICU stay. Also, SOFA scores before discharge/death were significantly different from admission scores. Of the 1,135 patients who survived their ICU stay, only 51 patients (4.5%) died within 28 days after ICU discharge. CONCLUSIONS: In 83, 7% of patients who die in the mixed ICU life-sustaining treatment is withdrawn. Severe cerebral damage was the leading reason to withdraw life-sustaining treatment.

Functional impairment of monocyte-derived dendritic cells in patients with severe chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Dendritic cells (DCs) are antigen-presenting cells that are pivotal for the initiation of the primary immune response. Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) with or without chronic intermittent haemodialysis (CIHD) show an impaired immune response. Dysfunction of DCs may underlie this phenomenon. METHODS: In this study, several different functions of monocyte-derived DCs (moDC) of patients with CKD class IV-V (glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min) and patients on CIHD were studied in vitro and compared with age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers. RESULTS: We demonstrate that, independent of the maturation stimulus used, mature moDC from both groups of patients did not acquire the same level of terminal differentiation as moDC from controls, as shown by analysis of cell surface markers and the relative high macropinocytosis activity of moDC. The stimulation of allogeneic T-cells by immature moDC and mature moDC did not differ between patients and controls. However, in the presence of immature moDC or antigen-loaded maturated moDC from patients, less proliferation of autologous T-cells was observed in response to recall antigens. There was no difference between moDC from controls and patients in their ability to activate naive T-cells and to differentiate them into Th1 and Th2 cells. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that the terminal differentiation of moDC in patients with severe CKD is impaired. This impairment is not restricted to one maturation stimulus and is independent of treatment with haemodialysis.

The effects of chronic kidney disease and renal replacement therapy on circulating dendritic cells.

BACKGROUND: The mechanisms underlying the immunodeficiency of chronic kidney disease (CKD) are incompletely understood. Recently, we described decreased numbers of myeloid (m) and plasmacytoid (p) dendritic cells (DCs), considered the most important antigen-presenting cells, in peripheral blood of patients on chronic intermittent haemodialysis (CIHD). In this study, we analysed whether this reduction resulted from CKD or from renal replacement therapy (RRT). METHODS: Using flowcytometry, we quantified mDCs and pDCs in peripheral blood of patients maintained on CIHD (n = 37), continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD; n = 29), and patients with CKD not receiving RRT (n = 37). Twenty-nine healthy volunteers served as controls. RESULTS: Patients with CKD (n = 103) had lower pDC and mDC counts compared with volunteers: 4.2 vs 8.3 and 10.0 vs 13.8 x 10(6) cells/l, respectively (P < or = 0.001). Within the CKD group, pDC counts did not differ between patients on CIHD, CAPD and those not receiving RRT (3.6 vs 5.0 vs 4.9 x 10(6) cells/l, respectively). In the latter group, pDC numbers correlated with the glomerular filtration rate (GFR; Spearman's r = 0.49; P<0.01). In contrast, mDC counts of patients on CIHD were lower compared with patients on CAPD (7.5 vs 10.1 x 10(6) cells/l; P = 0.039) and patients not receiving RRT (13.7 x 10(6) cells/l; P<0.001). Among non-dialyzing patients, no correlation existed between GFR and mDC numbers, which were comparable to those of volunteers, even when only non-dialyzing patients with a GFR below 15 ml/min were analysed. CONCLUSIONS: Circulating DC counts are decreased in patients with CKD; for pDCs, this reduction is primarily related to the loss of GFR, whereas the dialysis treatment appears to affect mDC numbers.

Peripheral blood dendritic cells and GM-CSF as an adjuvant for hepatitis B vaccination in hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Dysfunctional antigen presentation may underlie the impaired antibody response to hepatitis B vaccination in hemodialysis patients. Dendritic cells are considered to be the most important antigen presenting cells, but their presence and function in hemodialysis patients is unclear. Granulocyte-monocyte-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) has been given successfully to hemodialysis patients to increase the proportion of responders to hepatitis B vaccination. Although GM-CSF acts on both monocytes and dendritic cells, the mechanisms underlying its adjuvant quality are largely unknown. METHODS: In this study we analyzed monocytes and dendritic cells in the peripheral blood of hemodialysis patient that had responded to a standard hepatitis B vaccination procedure (responders), patients who had not responded (nonresponders), and healthy controls. The nonresponders were given two additional booster vaccines, both preceded by administration of GM-CSF the day before. RESULTS: After two booster vaccinations with GM-CSF, six out of seven patients developed a protective antibody response to hepatitis B. The memory T-cell response to tetanus toxoid was significantly lower in nonresponders compared to controls. The monocytes of dialysis patients and healthy controls showed a similar expression of relevant cell surface molecules. However, the numbers of circulating dendritic cells were on average 50% reduced compared to healthy controls, with a further reduction after GM-CSF administration. This was accompanied by a decrease of T-cell proliferation in antigen presentation assays. Monocytes showed increased major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II, CD54, and CD40 expression, while their antigen-presenting capacity remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: GM-CSF is an effective adjuvant for hepatitis B vaccination in primary nonresponding hemodialysis patients, but paradoxically decreases the antigen presenting capacity of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and the number of circulating dendritic cells.