Odontogenic Cutaneous Fistula: A Zombie Diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Odontogenic cutaneous fistula (OCF) is a pathologic communication between the cutaneous surface of the face and oral cavity. Majority of oral cutaneous fistulas are reported to arise from chronic dental infection. Delay in treatment may result in chronic tissue injury as well as cosmetic deformities. Lesions are often misdiagnosed, leading to delayed management. Misdiagnosis may be the result of the variability of clinical morphological presentation and location of lesions compounded by the lack of knowledge that these lesions can have dental etiology. It is estimated that half of patients with OCF undergo multiple dermatologic surgical operations, antibiotic regimens, and other excisions and biopsies before a correct diagnosis is made. Herein, we present a systematic review to detail cases of odontogenic cutaneous lesions that had been previously misdiagnosed or managed inappropriately. In addition, we include a case report from our own institution. The aims are to demonstrate various presentations of OCF, increase awareness of plastic surgeons and oral maxillofacial surgeons to this pathological condition, and reinforce the importance of prompt diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: The study was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases from January 1, 2013 to July 24, 2023. The following search terms were utilized: "odontogenic cutaneous fistula" OR "odontogenic cutaneous sinus." RESULTS: Twenty-three articles published between 2013 and 2023 were included in this review. In addition, we report a case from our own institution. A total of 28 cases were included in the review. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis of OCF is challenging for numerous reasons. Misdiagnosis can lead to multiple trials of antibiotics and surgical procedures as well as reoccurrence of the lesion. Cases summarized highlight the importance of communication between oral maxillofacial surgery, plastic surgery, other medical subspecialists, and dentists in the evaluation of patients with head and neck lesions. Physicians should consider dental etiology in the differential diagnosis of orofacial skin lesions, even if teeth appear normal on oral examination.

A Cost Analysis of Mohs and Total Surgical Excision: A Retrospective Review of Skin Cancer Treatments.

PURPOSE: Skin cancer risk is elevated in veterans, Whites, and males older than 50 years, who comprise the majority of patients at the Miami VA healthcare system.Treatments include total surgical excision (TSE) with frozen section or permanent pathology, and Mohs surgery. Our protocol consists of Mohs procedures performed offsite followed by reconstruction at the VA. This retrospective study examines the cost difference between TSE and Mohs surgery. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of VA patients who underwent TSE or Mohs surgery between 2017 and 2019. Patients younger than 18 or those without malignancy on final pathology were excluded. Patients were subdivided into TSE versus Mohs. Cost per operating room minute was determined using published data for similar institutions. Pathology costs were estimated using institution specific Medicare data. T test was performed using SPSS. RESULTS: Of 130 patients identified, 82 underwent TSE and 48 underwent Mohs with reconstruction. Cost per operating room minute for inpatient government-owned facilities was $37.94. A flat fee of $1400 for the Mohs surgery was the contracted rate with the offsite institution. Average cost of Mohs surgery with reconstruction was $3534.12. Average cost of TSE with pathology was $2643.85. Total surgical excision was significantly more cost efficient than Mohs with reconstruction (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: At our institution, TSE seems more cost effective than Mohs with subsequent reconstruction. While these are generalized costs, and data specific to our institution, cost efficiency is an important consideration in improving the value of care for VA patients.