The Effect of the Time Interval Between Radiation and Hyperthermia on Clinical Outcome in 400 Locally Advanced Cervical Carcinoma Patients.

Background: Addition of deep hyperthermia to radiotherapy results in improved local control (LC) and overall survival compared to radiotherapy alone in cervical carcinoma patients. Based on preclinical data, the time interval between radiotherapy, and hyperthermia is expected to influence treatment outcome. Clinical studies addressing the effect of time interval are sparse. The repercussions for clinical applications are substantial, as the time between radiotherapy and hyperthermia should be kept as short as possible. In this study, we therefore investigated the effect of the time interval between radiotherapy and hyperthermia on treatment outcome. Methods: We analyzed all primary cervical carcinoma patients treated between 1996 and 2016 with thermoradiotherapy at our institute. Data on patients, tumors and treatments were collected, including the thermal dose parameters TRISE and CEM43T90. Follow-up data on tumor status and survival as well as late toxicity were collected. Data was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards analysis and Kaplan Meier analysis. Results: 400 patients were included. Kaplan Meier and univariate Cox analysis showed no effect of the time interval (range 30-230 min) on any clinical outcome measure. Besides known prognostic factors, thermal dose parameters TRISE and CEM43T90 had a significant effect on LC. In multivariate analysis, the thermal dose parameter TRISE (HR 0.649; 95% CI 0.501-0.840) and the use of image guided brachytherapy (HR 0.432; 95% CI 0.214-0.972), but not the time interval, were significant predictors of LC and disease specific survival. Conclusions: The time interval between radiotherapy and hyperthermia, up to 4 h, has no effect on clinical outcome. These results are re-ensuring for our current practice of delivering hyperthermia within maximal 4 h after radiotherapy.

Prognostic value and kinetics of circulating endothelial cells in patients with recurrent glioblastoma randomised to bevacizumab plus lomustine, bevacizumab single agent or lomustine single agent. A report from the Dutch Neuro-Oncology Group BELOB trial.

BACKGROUND: Angiogenesis is crucial for glioblastoma growth, and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents are widely used in recurrent glioblastoma patients. The number of circulating endothelial cells (CECs) is a surrogate marker for endothelial damage. We assessed their kinetics and explored their prognostic value in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. METHODS: In this side study of the BELOB trial, 141 patients with recurrent glioblastoma were randomised to receive single-agent bevacizumab or lomustine, or bevacizumab plus lomustine. Before treatment, after 4 weeks and after 6 weeks of treatment, CECs were enumerated. RESULTS: The number of CECs increased during treatment with bevacizumab plus lomustine, but not during treatment in the single-agent arms. In patients treated with lomustine single agent, higher absolute CEC numbers after 4 weeks (log10CEC hazard ratio (HR) 0.41, 95% CI 0.18-0.91) and 6 weeks (log10CEC HR 0.16, 95% CI 0.05-0.56) of treatment were associated with improved overall survival (OS). Absolute CEC numbers in patients receiving bevacizumab plus lomustine or bevacizumab single agent were not associated with OS. CONCLUSION: CEC numbers increased during treatment with bevacizumab plus lomustine but not during treatment with either agent alone, suggesting that this combination induced the greatest vascular damage. Although the absolute number of CECs was not associated with OS in patients treated with bevacizumab either alone or in combination, they could serve as a marker in glioblastoma patients receiving lomustine single agent.

A randomized phase II study comparing two schedules of the 21-day regimen of gemcitabine and carboplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 5 ml/min on day 1 with gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) on day 1 and day 8 is a widely used regimen in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia are frequent. The aim of this study is to investigate whether toxicity of gemcitabine/carboplatin could be reduced by administering carboplatin on day 8 instead of day 1 without a decrease in response rate (RR). METHODS: Patients received gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, carboplatin AUC 5 on day 1 (arm A) or day 8 (arm B). Drugs were administered over a 21-day cycle. Toxicity and RR were evaluated weekly and every second cycle, respectively. RESULTS: 71 patients were enrolled into the study. We found 79% (95% CI 61-91%) grade 3-4 toxicity (neutropenia and thrombocytopenia) in arm A and 50% (95% CI 32-68%) in arm B; 66% grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in arm A and 26% in arm B. We observed 30% grade 4 hematological toxicity in arm A and 3% in arm B. In arm A an overall RR of 20% (95% CI 7.7-38.6%) was seen, and 18.2% (95% CI 7-35.5%) in arm B. CONCLUSIONS: Although the study was prematurely closed, the current data are of interest. The schedule with carboplatin on day 8 is associated with substantially lower grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia with comparable dose intensity and RR.

Pemetrexed and cisplatin with concurrent radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell and limited disease small cell lung cancer: results from 2 phase I studies.

BACKGROUND: The objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of pemetrexed and cisplatin with concurrent radiotherapy. Secondary objectives include incidence and nature of acute and late toxicities, tumor response and overall survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Treatment naïve patients received 1 cycle of cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) in study I (stage III NSCLC), 75 mg/m(2) in study II (LD-SCLC) and pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) before the phase I part. In study I, patients were treated in cohorts with escalating cisplatin doses (60-80 mg/m(2)), pemetrexed doses (400-500 mg/m(2)) and concurrent escalating radiotherapy doses (66 Gy in 33-27 fractions). In study II, patients were treated with cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) and escalating pemetrexed doses (400-500 mg/m(2)) with concurrent escalating radiotherapy doses (50-62 Gy). RESULTS: The trials closed prematurely: study I because of poor accrual, study II because of sponsor decision. Thirteen patients were treated: 4 with NSCLC, 9 with LD-SCLC. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed. There was no grade 4 toxicity, grade 3 hematological toxicity was mild. One patient developed grade 3 acute esophagitis, but was able to complete radiotherapy without delay. Two patients experienced grade 2 late pulmonary toxicity, 1 complete response, 6 partial responses and 1 progressive disease were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Although the studies stopped too early to assess MTD, we have demonstrated that the combination of cisplatin and pemetrexed with concurrent radiotherapy up to 66 Gy (33 x 2 Gy) is well tolerated and this new combination shows activity in NSCLC. Pemetrexed is the first 3rd generation cytotoxic found to be tolerable at full dose with concurrent radiotherapy.

Non-Cross Resistant Sequential Single Agent Chemotherapy in First-Line Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Results of a Phase II Study.

Background. sequential chemotherapy can maintain dose intensity and preclude cumulative toxicity by increasing drug diversity. Purpose. to investigate the toxicity and efficacy of the sequential regimen of gemcitabine followed by paclitaxel in first line advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with good performance status (PS). Patients and methods. gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) was administered on day 1 and 8 of course 1 and 2; Paclitaxel 150 mg/m(2) on day 1 and 8 of course 3 and 4. Primary endpoint was response rate (RR), secondary endpoints toxicity and time to progression (TTP). Results. Of the 21 patients (median age 56, range 38-80 years; 62% males, 38% females) 10% (2/21) had stage IIIB, 90% (19/21) stage IV, 15% PS 0, 85% PS 1. 20% of patients had a partial response, 30% stable disease, 50% progressive disease. Median TTP was 12 weeks (range 6-52 weeks), median overall survival (OS) 8 months (range 1-27 months), 1-year survival was 33%. One patient had grade 3 hematological toxicity, 2 patients a grade 3 peripheral neuropathy. Conclusions. sequential administration of gemcitabine followed by paclitaxel in first line treatment of advanced NSCLC had a favourable toxicity profile, a median TTP and OS comparable with other sequential trials and might, therefore, be a treatment option for NSCLC patients with high ERCC1 expression.

Oral UFT, etoposide and leucovorin in recurrent non-small cell lung cancer: a non-randomized phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Oral treatment regimens with few side effects are appealing in the 2nd or 3rd line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. PURPOSE: The aim was to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of the oral combination etoposide, Uracil-Tegafur (UFT) and leucovorin in 2nd or 3rd line in Caucasian patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Etoposide 50 mg/m(2), UFT 250 mg/m(2) and leucovorin 90 mg (fixed dose) were dosed in 3 gifts approximately 8h apart for 14 days followed by 1 week rest every 3 weeks until progressive disease (PD). Primary endpoint was response rate (RR), secondary endpoints toxicity and time to progression (TTP). RESULTS: The median number of cycles was 3.5 (95% CI 2-5); 9 patients received > or =6 cycles, 4>10 cycles. The median dose intensities for etoposide and UFT were 223 mg/m(2)/week (95% CI 213-232) and 1092 mg/m(2)/week (95% CI 1032-1167), the relative dose intensities 92% and 90%, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 12% (4/32), grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in 15% (5/32), without febrile neutropenia. Non-hematological toxicity grade 3 included hepatic toxicity (6%), lethargy (15%), diarrhea (3%) and nausea (3%). One patient developed grade 4 arterial ischemia. Fourteen percent (95% CI 4-33%) (4/28) had a confirmed partial response, 57% (95% CI 44-81%) (16/28) stable disease and 28% (95% CI 19-56%) (8/28) progressive disease. The median TTP was 3 months (95% CI 1.3-4.4), the median overall survival 6.7 months (95% CI 4.0-9.3). CONCLUSION: The combination of UFT, etoposide and leucovorin is active in 2nd or 3rd line therapy of Caucasian NSCLC patients and because of its favourable toxicity profile this treatment warrants further investigation.

A phase II study of induction therapy with carboplatin and gemcitabine among patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The objectives of this trial were to evaluate the activity and safety of gemcitabine carboplatin as induction therapy in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer METHODS: Patients received two cycles of gemcitabine (1250 mg/m on day 1 and 8), plus carboplatin (area under the curve = 5 on day 1), after which response was established. Patients received a third course only in the case of an objective response (OR). Non-responding patients were directly irradiated. Toxicity was assessed according to the NCI-CTC version 2, radiation toxicity was assessed according to RTOG criteria. Response evaluation was performed according to RECIST criteria. RESULTS: We identified 42 patients, of whom 37 were eligible. Of these, 51% (95% CI, 34%-68%) achieved an OR, all partial responses. No disease progression on therapy was established. Toxicity was mostly hematological: 35% trombocytopenia grade 3 and 4, and 40% neutropenia grade 3 and 4. No severe bleeding or hospitalization because of febrile neutropenia occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Gemcitabine and carboplatin administered according to a 3-week schedule is an active and safe induction regimen. Pending the results of a phase III study, we believe that it is a reasonable alternative among patients for whom cisplatin-based chemotherapy is contraindicated.

Endovascular brachytherapy for the prevention of restenosis after femoropopliteal angioplasty. Results of the VARA Trial.

AIM: Endovascular brachytherapy (EBT) has been proposed as a method to prevent restenosis. We performed a prospective randomised multicenter study to determine its efficacy for prophylaxis of restenosis after femoropopliteal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). METHODS: Patients with symptomatic stenotic or totally occluding lesions in the femoropopliteal artery were randomised to be treated with PTA plus EBT or PTA alone. In case of EBT, 14 Gy was applied by an 192Ir source to the vessel wall. Clinical examination, ankle-brachial pressure index (ABPI) and duplex ultrasound were planned after 6 and 12 months. The primary endpoint was significant restenosis of the treated segment at duplex ultrasound after 12 months. RESULTS: Fifty-three of the 60 patients who eventually met the inclusion criteria could be studied. After 12 months, restenosis rates were 44% (12/27) in the PTA group versus 35% (8/23) in the PTA + EBT group (c2 test, P=0.51). There was no difference in mandatory reintervention between the 2 groups. Overall, EBT resulted in an absolute risk reduction of significant restenosis of 9%, yet in patients with totally occlusive disease this reduction was 32%. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests an effect of EBT on the occurrence of restenosis only after PTA of occluded femoropopliteal lesions. Due to a too small number of patients analysed this difference is not statistically significant.