Term pregnant patients have similar gastric volume to non-pregnant females: a single-centre cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The physiological changes of pregnancy can increase the risk of peri-partum pulmonary aspiration. There is limited objective information regarding gastric volumes in pregnant patients. The aim of this cohort study was to characterise prospectively the range of gastric-fluid volume in term non-labouring pregnant patients compared with a historical cohort of non-pregnant females. METHODS: Fasted non-labouring term pregnant patients scheduled for elective Caesarean delivery underwent a standardised gastric ultrasound examination. Gastric content was evaluated qualitatively (type of content), semi-quantitatively (Perlas grades), and quantitatively (volume). The antral cross-sectional area and volume were compared with those of a retrospective cohort of non-pregnant females from the same institution. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the central tendency through mean and median values. Dispersion was evaluated with standard deviation and inter-quartile range, and the higher end of the distribution as 95th percentile. RESULTS: Non-labouring pregnant (59) and non-pregnant (81) subjects were studied. The range of estimated total gastric-fluid volume (P=0.96) and volume per body weight (P=0.78) was not significantly different between cohorts. An estimated volume of 115 ml (102-143) vs 136 ml (106-149) and volume per body weight of 1.4 ml kg-1 (1.2-2.8) vs 2.0 ml kg-1 (1.5-2.7) corresponded to the 95th percentile (95% confidence interval) values in the pregnant and non-pregnant cohort, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline gastric volume of non-labouring pregnant patients at term is not significantly different from that of non-pregnant females. This information will be helpful to interpreting findings of gastric point-of-care ultrasound in obstetric patients.

When fasted is not empty: a retrospective cohort study of gastric content in fasted surgical patients†.

Background: Perioperative aspiration leads to significant morbidity and mortality. Point-of-care gastric ultrasound is an emerging tool to assess gastric content at the bedside. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of baseline gastric content on fasted elective surgical patients. The primary outcome was the incidence of full stomach (solid content or >1.5 ml kg−1 of clear fluid). Secondary outcomes included: gastric volume distribution (entire cohort, each antral grade); the association between gastric fullness, fasting intervals, and co-morbidities; anaesthetic management changes and incidence of aspiration. Results: We identified 538 patients. Thirty-two patients (6.2%) presented with a full stomach. Nine of these (1.7%) had solid content and 23 (4.5%) had clear fluid >1.5 ml kg−1. An empty stomach was documented in 480 (89.8%) patients. The examination was inconclusive in the remaining 20 patients (5.0%). As expected, increasing antral grade was correlated with larger antral cross-sectional area and higher gastric volume (P<0.001). Of the 32 patients with a full stomach, only six had a documented risk factor for prolonged gastric emptying. The anaesthetic management was changed in all nine patients with solid content. No aspiration was reported. Conclusions: This retrospective cohort study suggests that a small proportion of elective surgical patients may present with a full stomach despite the recommended duration of fasting. Further research is needed to establish the clinical implications of these findings in the elective setting. At present, the clinical role of gastric ultrasound continues to be for the evaluation of gastric contents to guide management when the risk of aspiration is uncertain or unknown.