Multicentre phase II study and pharmacokinetic analysis of irinotecan in chemotherapy-naïve patients with glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: To assess the antitumour activity and safety profile of irinotecan and its pharmacokinetic interactions with anticonvulsants in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicentre phase II and pharmacokinetic study investigated the effects of irinotecan 350 mg/m(2) given as a 90-min infusion every 3 weeks either prior to (group A) or after relapse following radiotherapy (group B) in chemotherapy-naïve patients with glioblastoma. Preferred concomitant medication for seizure prevention was valproic acid. Pharmacokinetic analysis of irinotecan and its main metabolites (SN-38, SN-38-G, APC and NPC) was performed during cycle 1. An independent panel of experts reviewed the activity data. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients (25 patients in group A and 27 patients in group B) received a total of 191 cycles of irinotecan. Forty-six patients (22 patients in group A and 24 patients in group B) were evaluable and externally reviewed for activity. According to external review, one partial response (group B), seven minor responses (three in group A and four in group B), 12 disease stabilisations (seven in group A and five in group B) were observed. This resulted in an overall response rate of only 2.2% (95% confidence interval 0.2% to 6.5%). The median time to tumour progression was 9 weeks in group A and 14.4 weeks in group B. Six-month progression-free survival rates were 26% in group A and 43% in group B. Grade 3-4 toxicities (percentage of patients in groups A and B) consisted of neutropenia (12.5% and 25.9%), diarrhoea (8.3% and 7.4%), asthenia (12.5% and 7.4%) and vomiting (0% and 7.4%). The clearance of irinotecan was 12.4 and 14.4 l/h/m(2) in two patients who received no anticonvulsant. In patients receiving valproic acid, the clearance of irinotecan was 17.2 +/- 4.4 l/h/m(2). CONCLUSIONS: Irinotecan given at the dose of 350 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks has limited clinical activity as a single agent in patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma after radiotherapy. The toxicity profile and plasma disposition of irinotecan and SN-38 were not strongly influenced by anticonvulsant valproic acid therapy. Although the response rate of irinotecan as a single agent was limited, it remains an attractive drug for combination studies in patients with glioblastoma.

Phase I study of docetaxel in combination with cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

This phase I was study conducted to establish the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicity, and recommended dose of docetaxel in combination with cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Twenty-six patients were treated with cyclophosphamide (600 mg m(-2), intravenous bolus) followed by docetaxel (60, 75 or 85 mg m(-2), 1-h intravenous infusion) every 3 weeks. The maximum tolerated dose was docetaxel 85 mg m(-2) with cyclophosphamide 600 mg m(-2), the dose-limiting toxicity being febrile neutropenia. Grade 4 neutropenia was experienced by all patients, but was generally brief. Otherwise, the combination was well tolerated with few acute and no chronic non-haematological toxicities of grade 3/4. Activity was observed at all dose levels and disease sites, and the overall response rate was 42% (95% confidence interval 22-61%). The pharmacokinetics of docetaxel were not modified by cyclophosphamide coadministration. These findings establish a recommended dose of docetaxel 75 mg m(-2) in combination with cyclophosphamide 600 mg m(-2) every three weeks for phase II evaluation.

Phase I dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study of docetaxel and vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Anthracycline-containing regimens are widely used in advanced breast cancer. However, there is a need for new, non-anthracycline regimens that are active in patients for whom anthracyclines are contraindicated. The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and recommended doses of docetaxel and vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The pharmacokinetics of both drugs was also evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four women with first-line metastatic breast cancer were treated with docetaxel, 60-100 mg/m2 (day 1), and vinorelbine, 20-22.5 mg/m2 (days 1 and 5), repeated every three weeks and administered on an outpatient basis. RESULTS: Two MTDs were determined: MTD1 was defined at the dose level using docetaxel 75 mg/m2, and vinorelbine 22.5 mg/m2 DLT being a grade 3 stomatitis that was more related to the dose of vinorelbine than that of docetaxel. Therefore, the study continued with a fixed dose of vinorelbine, 20 mg/m2, and docetaxel 85-100 mg/m2. MTD2 was defined at the dose level combining docetaxel, 100 mg/m2, and vinorelbine, 20 mg/m2; DLTs were grade 3 stomatitis and severe asthenia. Fluid retention was observed in 41% of patients but was never severe or a reason for patient discontinuation. In comparison with historical experience, Daflon 500 did not seem to increase the efficacy of the three-day corticosteroid premedication by further reducing the incidence or severity of fluid retention. No significant neurotoxicity was observed and no patient discontinued the study due to this site effect. Activity was observed at all dose levels and at all metastatic sites, with an overall response rate of 71% (95% CI: 52.0%-85.8%). The median time to progression was 31.4 weeks (95% CI: 12-48 weeks) and median survival was 15.6 months (95% CI: 2.6-26.6 months). The pharmacokinetics of docetaxel and vinorelbine were not modified between day 1 and day 3 when the two drugs were combined with the day 1 administration schedule used in this study. CONCLUSION: The recommended doses for phase II studies are docetaxel, 75 mg/m2 (day 1), plus vinorelbine, 20 mg/m2 (days 1 and 5), repeated every three weeks. At these doses, the combination was found to be active and well tolerated.

Phase I dose-finding study of a new taxane, RPR 109881A, administered as a one-hour intravenous infusion days 1 and 8 to patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To define the maximum-tolerated dose, recommended phase II dose (RD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and pharmacokinetics of a novel taxane, RPR 109881A, administered on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients were enrolled and treated according to a modified continual reassessment method from a starting dose of 7.5 mg/m(2) to 52.5 mg/m(2). Detailed pharmacokinetic analyses of blood and urine were performed on days 1 and 8 of the first cycle. Toxicity was monitored weekly. RESULTS: DLT consisting of grade 3 or 4 diarrhea was seen in three of six patients at 52.5 mg/m(2). Grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia was also seen in five of six patients treated at this dose (four of six in the first cycle). At the next lower dose level, 45 mg/m(2) toxicity was moderate, with only one of 12 patients experiencing severe diarrhea and grade 4 granulocytopenia with associated infection. Drug concentrations were consistent with a three-compartment open model. The total-body clearance suggests a linear dose-concentration relationship. RPR 109881A has a high clearance (mean, 42.6 L/h/m(2)), a large volume of distribution (mean, 952 L/m(2)), and a long terminal half-life (mean, 24 hours). There was no drug accumulation between days 1 and 8. One partial response was seen in a patient with renal cell carcinoma. CONCLUSION: The RD of RPR 109881A given as a 1-hour infusion on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle is 45 mg/m(2). At this dose the drug is well tolerated and should be further studied.

Docetaxel in combination with 5-fluorouracil in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy: a phase I, dose-finding study.

This phase I study evaluated the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicity and recommended dose of docetaxel in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy. 32 patients received docetaxel at 60, 75, 85 or 100 mg/m(2) by 1-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion, followed, after a 1-h interval, by 5-FU at 250, 350, 500 or 750 mg/m(2)/day by continuous infusion over 5 days every 3 weeks. Dose-limiting stomatitis defined the maximum tolerated dose at a docetaxel dose of 100 mg/m(2) with 5-FU 750 mg/m(2)/day. None of 5 patients treated at the previous dose level (docetaxel 85 mg/m(2) with 5-FU 750 mg/m(2)/day) had a dose-limiting toxicity in the first cycle, and this was, therefore, considered the recommended dose. The combination was generally well tolerated. Grade 4 neutropenia was common (29 patients; 91%), but no patient experienced febrile neutropenia of duration >3 days requiring i.v. antibiotics. An objective response was achieved by 18 patients overall (56%), and in 4 out of 5 patients treated with the determined recommended dose. No pharmacokinetic interaction between docetaxel and 5-fluorouracil was apparent. The activity of docetaxel 85 mg/m(2) with 5-fluorouracil 750 mg/m(2)/day will be explored more extensively in phase II studies of patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy.

Phase I study of irinotecan and raltitrexed in patients with advanced gastrointestinal tract adenocarcinoma.

To determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of irinotecan and raltitrexed given as sequential short infusions every 3 weeks, 33 patients with pretreated gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma (31 colorectal, 2 oesophagogastric) entered this open label dose-escalation study. For the first five dose levels patients received irinotecan 175-350 mg m(-2) followed by raltitrexed 2.6 mg m(-2). Level VI was irinotecan 350 mg m(-2) plus raltitrexed 3.0 mg m(-2), level VII was irinotecan 400 mg m(-2) plus raltitrexed 2.6 mg m(-2); 261 courses were administered. Only one patient at dose levels I-V experienced DLT. At level VI, 5/12 patients experienced DLT: one had grade 3 diarrhoea and lethargy, one had grade 4 diarrhoea and one had lethargy alone. Two others had lethargy caused by disease progression. There was no first-cycle neutropenia. At level VII, 3/6 patients experienced dose-limiting lethargy, one also had grade 3 diarrhoea. Dose intensity fell from over 90% for both drugs at level VI to 83% for irinotecan and 66% for raltitrexed at level VII. Lethargy was therefore the DLT, and level VII the MTD. Pharmacokinetic data showed no measurable drug interaction; 6/30 patients (20%) had objective responses. This combination is active with manageable toxicity. Recommended doses for further evaluation are irinotecan 350 mg m(-2) and raltitrexed 3.0 mg m(-2).

In vitro binding and partitioning of irinotecan (CPT-11) and its metabolite, SN-38, in human blood.

The binding of CPT-11 and SN-38 to human plasma proteins was studied by ultrafiltration at 37 degrees C and pH 7.4. In plasma, CPT-11 was 66-60% bound in the range 100-4000 ng/ml and SN-38 was 94-96% bound in the range 50-200 ng/ml. At these concentrations the plasma binding of CPT-11 was slightly saturable, but the plasma binding of SN-38 was concentration-independent. Albumin was the main carrier of CPT-11 and SN-38 in plasma. In blood, the binding of CPT-11 was moderate (80%), mainly to plasma proteins (47%) and erythrocytes (33%). The binding of SN-38 was high (99%) and most of SN-38 in blood was located in blood cells (approximately 66%) The simulation of a grade 3 hematotoxicity (according to National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria grading) on the SN-38 blood distribution yielded an increase in fu (free fraction of drug in plasma) from 1.05 to 2.08 and a decrease in C(Bl)/C(P) from 1.66 to 1.14 (both resulting from a decreased cell binding).

Metabolism of irinotecan (CPT-11) by CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 in humans.

7-Ethyl-10[4-(1-piperidino)-1-piperidino] carbonyloxy-camptothecin (CPT-11), a DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor, undergoes several metabolic pathways to generate conjugated and unconjugated derivatives that could be excreted from the body. The objective of this study was to determine the oxidative metabolites of CPT-11 recovered in human urine samples and to identify cytochrome P450 (CYP) involved in their formation. In addition to the already known metabolites of CPT-11 [SN-38, SN-38-G, 7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(5-aminopentanoic acid)-1-piperidino]carbonyloxycamptothecin (APC), and 7-ethyl-10-(4-amino-1-piperidino) carbonyloxycamptothecin (NPC)], we isolated three oxidized metabolites from the urine of two children and two adults given CPT-11. M1 and M2 (molecular weight, 602) were hydroxylated, respectively, on the CPT moiety and on the terminal piperidine ring of CPT-11. M3 had a molecular mass of 602, but its urine concentration in patients was too low to establish its chemical structure by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. In vitro incubations with cells expressing CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP1A1, CYP1A2, or CYP3A7 did not produce any detectable metabolites. Only CYP3A4 produced both APC and NPC, resulting from the oxidation of the piperidinylpiperidine side chain of CPT-11 along with metabolite M2. The metabolism of CPT-11 by CYP3A5 was markedly different because neither APC or NPC nor M2 was produced, whereas only one new metabolite, M4 (molecular weight, 558), was generated by de-ethylation of the CPT moiety. No previous study has reported the presence of the M4 metabolite. Production of APC, NPC, M2, and M4 was prevented by ketoconazole, a specific CYP3A inhibitor. The parameters of CPT-11 biotransformation into M2 and M4 were examined using cell lines expressing, respectively, with CYP3A4 and CYP3A5, indicating that CPT-11 is preferentially metabolized by CYP3A4. In conclusion, CYP3A plays a major role in the metabolism of CPT-11, with some differences of the metabolic profile exhibited by 3A4 and 3A5.

Pharmacokinetic, metabolic, and pharmacodynamic profiles in a dose-escalating study of irinotecan and cisplatin.

PURPOSE: To investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irinotecan and cisplatin administered once every 3 weeks in a dose-escalating study in patients with solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two cancer patients were treated with irinotecan administered as a 90-minute infusion at doses ranging from 175 to 300 mg/m(2) followed by cisplatin administered as a 3-hour intravenous infusion at doses ranging from 60 to 80 mg/m(2). After reaching the maximum-tolerated dose, the sequence of drug administration was revised. For pharmacokinetic analysis, serial plasma samples were obtained on days 1 through 3 of the first cycle. Forty-five patients were assessable for irinotecan pharmacokinetics, and 46 were assessable for cisplatin pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: Irinotecan and cisplatin demonstrated linear pharmacokinetics comparable to that observed with single-agent administration, which suggests an absence of pharmacokinetic interaction. SN-38G constituted the major plasma metabolite of irinotecan, whereas 7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(1-piperidino)1-amino]-carbonyloxycamptothecine (NPC) was only a minor metabolite in plasma, possibly indicating a rapid conversion of NPC to SN-38. The terminal elimination phases of SN-38 and SN-38G were similar and relatively delayed when compared with the elimination of irinotecan. Maximal DNA adduct formation did not significantly differ from that observed with single-agent administration. The percentage decrease in WBC was significantly related to the areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUCs) of the lactone form of irinotecan (P =.0245) and SN-38 (P =. 0123). The severity of diarrhea was not significantly related to the AUCs of irinotecan and SN-38, nor to the systemic glucuronidation rate of SN-38. CONCLUSION: There was no apparent pharmacokinetic interaction between irinotecan and cisplatin in this study. Reversion of the administration sequence of the drugs did not seem to have any influence on the pharmacokinetics. The incidence and severity of delayed-type diarrhea was not related to any of the studied parameters.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan administered as a low-dose, continuous intravenous infusion over 14 days in patients with malignant solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of administering irinotecan as a continuous intravenous infusion for 14 to 21 days. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with solid tumors refractory to standard therapy received continuous infusions of irinotecan by means of an ambulatory infusion pump. The starting dosage was 12.5 mg/m(2)/d for 14 days every 3 weeks. After identification of the maximum-tolerated dose for the 14-day infusion schedule, the protocol was amended to prolong the infusion duration to 17 and 21 days. Pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and SN-38 and its glucuronide were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography and noncompartmental modeling. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients received 85+ courses. At the first dose level (12.5 mg/m(2)/d), cumulative grade 3 or 4 diarrhea and grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in three of five patients. At a dosage of 10 mg/m(2)/d, 14-day administration resulted in grade 4 diarrhea in two of six patients and one episode of grade 4 vomiting occurred, whereas with 17-day administration, one episode of grade 3 nausea and two episodes of grade 3 or 4 diarrhea were observed in six patients. Increasing the number of days of infusion to 21 days was not feasible because of cumulative diarrhea. Hematologic toxicity was rare. The mean metabolic SN-38 area under the curve/irinotecan area under the curve ratio was 16% +/- 6% compared with 3% to 5% after short infusion schedules involving therapeutic dosages. Partial responses were observed in two patients with extraovarian and colorectal cancer. CONCLUSION: The recommended dosage is 10 mg/m(2)/d for 14 days, repeated every 3 weeks. Enhanced metabolism of irinotecan to SN-38 may explain in part the low recommended dose for this schedule.

Drug-administration sequence does not change pharmacodynamics and kinetics of irinotecan and cisplatin.

In this study, 11 patients with solid tumors were randomized to receive irinotecan (CPT-11; 200 mg/m2) as a 90-min i.v. infusion, immediately followed by cisplatin (CDDP; 80 mg/m2) as a 3-h i.v. infusion in the first course and the reversed sequence in the second course or vice versa. No significant differences in any toxicity were observed between the treatment schedules (decrease in absolute neutrophil count, 74.7 +/- 18.3 versus 80.3 +/- 18.0%; P = 0.41). CPT-11 lactone clearance was similar to single agent data and not significantly different between study courses (60.4 +/- 17.1 versus 65.5 +/- 16.3 liter/h/m2; P = 0.66). The kinetic profiles of the major CPT-11 metabolites SN-38, SN-38 glucuronide, 7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(5-aminopentanoic acid)-1-piperidinolcarbonyloxycamptothecine (APC), and 7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(1-piperidino)-1-amino]carbonyloxycamptothecine (NPC) were also sequence independent (P > or = 0.20). In addition, CPT-11 had no influence on the clearance of nonprotein-bound CDDP (40.8 +/- 16.7 versus 50.3 +/- 18.6 liter/h/m2; P = 0.08) and the platinum DNA-adduct formation in peripheral leukocytes in either sequence (1.94 +/- 2.20 versus 2.42 +/- 1.62 pg Pt/microg DNA; P = 0.41). These data indicate that the toxicity of the combination CPT-11 and CDDP is schedule independent and that there is no mutual pharmacokinetic interaction.

Sparse-data set analysis for irinotecan and SN-38 pharmacokinetics in cancer patients co-treated with cisplatin.

The clinical pharmacokinetics of the antineoplastic agent irinotecan (CPT-11) are associated with substantial interpatient variability. The degree to which this variability in CPT-11 exposure impacts upon the response and toxicity of the drug has not yet been properly determined. In general, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) is an appropriate indicator of exposure, but requires collection of up to 17 timed blood samples. This presents difficulties if large-scale population samplings are required. The present study involved the development and validation of a strategy to estimate the AUCs of the lactone and total (i.e. lactone plus carboxylate) forms of CPT-11 and its active metabolite SN-38 from a limited number of blood samples in patients co-treated with cisplatin. Using data from 24 patients, univariate and multivariate regression analyses were employed to generate the models. The best predictive models for simultaneous estimation of CPT-11 and SN-38 AUCs were obtained with three time points at 0.5, 1.67 and 5.50 h after start of the 90 min i.v. infusion of CPT-11. The models were tested separately in another group of 24 patients receiving the same combination treatment. This validation set demonstrated that CPT-11 and SN-38 AUCs after standard dose administration could be predicted sufficiently unbiased and precisely with three timed samples to warrant clinical application.

Simultaneous determination of the lactone and carboxylate forms of the camptothecin derivative CPT-11 and its metabolite SN-38 in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography.

CPT-11 (irinotecan) and mainly its metabolite SN-38 are potent antitumor derivatives of camptothecin. As the active lactone forms of both CPT-11 and SN-38 exist in pH-dependent equilibrium with their respective less potent open-ring hydroxy acid species, the simultaneous monitoring of both forms of both compounds is relevant. CPT-11 and SN-38 derivatives have quite different fluorescence responses. In order to avoid any compromise on the wavelength setting, we developed chromatographic conditions allowing simple automated wavelength setting changes which have been prevented using existing methods involving conventional C18 columns. This was achieved by means of a Symmetry C18 column combined to a gradient elution program using acetonitrile and 75 mM ammonium acetate plus 7.5 mM tetrabutylammonium bromide at pH 6.4. The developed conditions allowed an elution order suitable for a simple automated wavelength change in respect to reliable peak integration. CPT-11 and SN-38 derivatives were detected at lambda ex=362 nm/lambda em=425 nm and lambda ex=375 nm/lambda em =560 nm, respectively. The developed method allowed the detection of amounts less than 3 pg of each derivative injected on column. The method was successfully applied to pharmacokinetic and toxicokinetic studies in rat and dog.

A rapid reversed phase high performance liquid chromatographic method for the determination of docetaxel (Taxotere) in human plasma using a column switching technique.

A rapid, simple and sensitive isocratic high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method was developed to measure the concentration of docetaxel in plasma samples with UV detection at 227 nm. The method uses a column switching technique with an Ultrasphere C18 column (75 x 4.6 mm ID, 3 mu, Altex, USA) as clean-up column and a CSC-nucleosil C8 column (150 x 4.6 mm ID, 5 mu, CSC, Montreal, Canada) as the analytical column. The mobile phase consisted of Phosphate buffer (30 mM, pH = 3)-acetonitrile (47:53, v/v) with the flow rates of 1.1 and 1.3 ml min-1 for clean-up and analytical columns, respectively. Paclitaxel was used as an internal standard. The plasma samples were extracted using a solid phase extraction method with Ammonium acetate (30 mM, pH = 5)-acetonitrile (50:50, v/v) as final eluent. The extraction method showed a recovery of 92% for docetaxel. In this system, the retention times of docetaxel and Paclitaxel were 7.2 and 8.5 min, respectively. The detection limit of docetaxel in plasma is 2.5 ng ml-1. This analytical method has a very good reproducibility (7.2% between-day variability at a concentration of 10 ng ml-1). It is applicable in clinical and pharmacokinetic studies.

Metabolism of irinotecan (CPT-11) by human hepatic microsomes: participation of cytochrome P-450 3A and drug interactions.

Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a water-soluble analogue of camptothecin showing activity in colon cancer. Recently, we identified a major metabolite of CPT-11 in patients' plasma, 7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(5-aminopentanoic acid)-1-piperidino] carbonyloxycamptothecin (APC), which is produced by the oxidation of the distal piperidine ring (P. Rivory et al, Cancer Res., 56: 3689-3694, 1996). As with all active camptothecin derivatives, CPT-11 is subject to spontaneous interconversion between a lactone and a carboxylate form in aqueous media. The kinetics of biotransformation of the two forms of CPT-11 into APC was studied using pooled human liver microsomes. The formation of APC was characterized by the following parameters: Km = 18.4 +/- 1.4 and 39.7 +/- 11.6 microM; and Vmax = 26.0 +/- 0.6 and 13.4 +/- 1.7 pmol/min/mg protein for the lactone and carboxylate forms of CPT-11, respectively. This reaction was found to be catalyzed principally by cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 3A because of three key results: (a) the CYP 3A-selective inhibitors ketoconazole (1 microM) and troleandomycin (100 microM) inhibited APC formation by 98 and 100%, respectively, mostly in a competitive way; (b) using microsomes from transfected lymphoblastoid cells expressing specific CYPs, we found that only those from CYP 3A4 cDNA-transfected cells transformed CPT-11 into APC; and (c) using 15 individual preparations of human liver microsomes, we observed highly significant correlations between the activity of CPT-11 metabolism into APC and both immunoreactivity with anti-CYP 3A antibodies and testosterone 6beta hydroxylation, an activity specifically mediated by CYP 3A. The effect on this metabolism of 11 drugs used at 100 microM was studied with CPT-11 lactone at 25 microM. Amikacin, Bactrim, ciprofloxacin, rocephine, 5-fluorouracil, metoclopramide, morphine, and paracetamol had no effect, but ondansetron, loperamide, and racecadotril inhibited this pathway by 25, 50, and 50%, respectively. These concentrations exceed those expected in vivo. APC formation in patients may thus be influenced by coadministered ketoconazole therapy and may decline after administration of CPT-11 because of the lactonolysis of the latter.

Noninterchangeability of specific radioimmunoassay and monoclonal antibody fluorescent polarization immunoassay in cyclosporine measurements.

This study compares cyclosporine (CsA) concentrations in whole blood from patients receiving bone marrow (n = 10), renal (n = 48), heart (n = 50) or liver (n = 50) transplants, as measured by monoclonal antibody flurorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) and specific 125I-radioimmunoassay (RIA). The FPIA overestimated CsA by an average of 25%. Results were higher for all indications: FPIA/RIA ratios were 1.17 for bone marrow, 1.23 for renal and 1.27 for both heart and liver transplants, and these values were significantly different from 1.0. The percentage of overestimation was higher at low CsA concentrations (< or = 100 micrograms/L) than at high CsA concentrations (> or = 400 micrograms/L). In all indications, results by both methods correlated well (r > 0.96) but slopes and intercepts were different from 1.0 and 0.0, respectively, and these parameters varied greatly between the grafted populations. These findings obtained with the two methods could not be attributed to matrix effect because the mean FPIA/RIA ratio for spiked control samples was 1.0. The discrepancy between the FPIA and RIA could be explained by the lower specificity of the monoclonal antibody contained in the FPIA kit. These results suggest that FPIA is not as accurate as RIA and that the two methods are not interchangeable in CsA level measurement.

Cyclosporine disposition and metabolite profiles in renal transplant patients receiving a microemulsion formulation.

Several lines of evidence suggest that cyclosporine may undergo prehepatic metabolism, the possible contribution of which to the overall biotransformation of the drug is, however, unclear. A recently developed oral formulation of cyclosporine, Sandimmune Neoral, which incorporates the drug in a microemulsion preconcentrate, exhibits a faster rate of absorption and a shorter residence time in the gastrointestinal tract compared to the currently marketed formulation, Sandimmune. If prehepatic metabolism plays an important role, this could, theoretically, have an impact on the metabolite profile from the microemulsion formulation. Therefore, the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine and its major metabolites were assessed in 13 clinically stable renal transplant patients receiving the commercial and the new formulations at steady state. Whole blood samples were collected over a dosing interval and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Model-fitting of the concentration-time profiles of the parent compound indicated that while the systemic disposition was similar between formulations, absorption-related pharmacokinetic differences were evident. This was manifested in patients at steady state as shorter lag time and faster rate of absorption of the parent compound from the microemulsion formulation. The metabolite-to-parent area under the curve (AUC) ratios for the major metabolites AM1, AM4N, and AM9 were comparable between formulations. Specifically for metabolites AM1 and AM9, which predominated in whole blood and could, therefore, be fully characterized, the area ratios were bioequivalent when comparing the two formulations. Hence, absorption-related differences between the two oral formulations does not affect the systemic metabolite profile during steady-state administration in patients.

Effects of plasma lipid levels on blood distribution and pharmacokinetics of cyclosporin A.

The present study attempted to characterize the distribution of cyclosporin A (CsA) among the lipoprotein fractions, very-low-, intermediate-, low-, and high-density (VLDL, IDL, LDL, and HDL, respectively) in the plasma of patients awaiting heart transplantation and the influence of plasma lipid constituents on the pharmacokinetics of CsA. Major fractions of a therapeutic concentration of CsA were found in HDL and in LDL. In addition, plasma lipid concentrations (total cholesterol, triglycerides, phospholipids, VLDL-cholesterol--TC, TG, PL, VLDLc, respectively) are positively correlated with the CsA distribution within the LDL fraction, and negatively correlated with the CsA distribution within the HDL fraction. Thus, the percentage of CsA in each type of lipoproteins was shown to vary with the lipid levels among individuals. A significant negative correlation was found between apparent distribution volume at steady state (Vss) in plasma and TC, PL, and LDLc and between the area under the curve measured in blood (AUCB) for whole blood and PL.

Trials of the bronchodilator activity of the xanthine analogue SDZ MKS 492 in healthy volunteers during a methacholine challenge test.

An approximately steady-state reduction of specific airway conductance was induced in healthy human subjects by means of an individualized inhaled methacholine loading dose followed by a maintenance dose regime. Tested against this background bronchoconstriction, the xanthine analogue SDZ MKS 492, when administered as a single oral dose of 40 mg, showed a significant bronchodilator action, which lasted for up to 5.5 h. Bronchodilatation was not seen after administration of 10 or 20 mg doses. SDZ MKS 492 inhaled as a dry powder had a bronchodilator action that was small, most evident with the 12 mg dose and transient. The peak relief of imposed bronchoconstriction was 29% and the apparent half-time of removal of SDZ MKS 492 from its site of action was 5-6 min. Inhaled SDZ 492 had a bitter taste that was not masked by inclusion of menthol and aspartame in the formulation. The bronchodilatation seen in laboratory animals can also be produced by SDZ MKS 492 in man when administered orally or by inhalation. Its magnitude correlates better with the plasma concentration of parent drug than with that of either of the identified metabolites. Dispositional processes in the lung abbreviate its action after administration by inhalation.