Pediatric total fractionated metanephrines: age-related reference intervals in spot urine.

BACKGROUND: Sparse metanephrines reference intervals in pediatric populations are available and different study designs and technologies/ assays used in these studies lead to hardly transferable data from a laboratory to another. The aim of this study was to update pediatric reference intervals of total fractionated metanephrines in spot urine samples, using a commercial extraction kit run on a specific high-pressure liquid chromatograph coupled with an electrochemical detector. METHODS: Four hundred and fifty-two spot pediatric urinary samples previously submitted to urinalysis were consecutively included in the study with the exclusion of children's samples with diagnosis or clinical suspicion of paraganglioma/pheochromocytoma, kidney diseases and arterial hypertension. Urinary metanephrine, normetanephrine and 3-methoxytyramine were extracted with ClinRep® HPLC Complete kit and run on HPLC Prominence liquid chromatograph LC-20AT (Shimadzu Italia S.r.l. Milan, Italy) coupled with Decade II electrochemical detector (Antec Scientific, Zoeterwoude, the Nederlands, provided by Alfatech S.r.l., Genoa, Italy). Results were expressed as the ratio analyte-to-creatinine. RESULTS: Any of the three analytes required a repartition by gender (metanephrine P=0.27; normetanephrine P=0.90 and 3-methoxytyramine P=0.18). A significant statistically inversely proportional relation with age was found for metanephrine (P<0.0001; ρ=-0.72), normetanephrine (P<0.0001; ρ=-0.75) and 3-methoxytyramine (P<0.0001; ρ=-0.83). Reference intervals were calculated as function of age. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides pediatric reference intervals for urinary fractionated total metanephrines in spot urine calibrated on a specific instrumentation and extraction commercial kit.

Total Value of Ownership and Overall Equipment Effectiveness analysis to evaluate the impact of automation on time and costs of therapeutic drug monitoring.

Total Value of Ownership (TVO) and Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) analysis are novel tools capable of monitoring and analyzing industrial processes by assessing the efficiency of the entire instrumental equipment and calculating instrument capacity utilization. Such integrated analysis, measuring quality indicators of the testing process, could also provide new perspectives and methodologies for the workflow organization of clinical laboratories. In this study, TVO and OEE were employed for the evaluation of two different configurations of a therapeutic drug monitoring sector, comparing the results obtained for immunosuppressant (ISD) and anti-epileptic drugs (AED) analysis as well as checking their quantitative performance in terms of limit of quantification, accuracy and precision. TVO analysis was performed for ISDs, including the Total Direct Labor Time, Total Cycle Time and Turnaround Time as well as cost of testing. Instruments' performance and workload were assessed using OEE indicator, studying Availability, Performance and Quality factors. Total Cycle Time for a batch was 3.55 h, decreasing of 1.5 h in the new setting where personnel are engaged for 0.98 h, 25% of total testing time. The calculated cost per sample was 6.60 euro. Availability values were significantly higher for automated sample-handling system and ISDs analysis by LC-MS. Higher Performance values were obtained for LC-MS system for AED and other TDM. Quality values were >0.94 for all instruments. TVO and OEE proved to be applicable to clinical laboratory environment, quantifying benefits and costs of newly developed semi-automated therapeutic drug monitoring sector. This novel approach based on an integrated analysis may help activity planning and quality improvement and could be used in the future for benchmarking progress as a product/process comparison tool in other laboratory fields.

Carbohydrate-deficient transferrin: utility of HPLC in handling atypical samples uninterpretable by capillary electrophoresis.

AIMS: Carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) is a marker of chronic alcohol abuse. Uninterpretable (atypical) CDT patterns have been detected by both capillary electrophoresis (CE) and HPLC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of HPLC as a second-line test for the interpretation of most frequent atypical CDT profiles detected by CE. METHODS: CDT was analyzed by CE (Capillarys 2, Sebia) on 9120 consecutive samples in a routine laboratory setting during a 2-year period. A commercial method (ClinRep CDT kit, Recipe) was employed to retest 123 (1.4%) samples with atypical CDT patterns on a Prominence LC-20AT HPLC (Shimadzu). RESULTS: CE-uninterpretable samples were categorized as having low transferrin (Tf) concentration (LT; n = 42, 0.5%), di-trisialotransferrin bridging (D-TB; n = 63, 0.7%) or atypical peak profile (APP; n = 18, 0.2%). CDT was detectable by HPLC in 58 of 123 (47%) samples including 21of 42 (50%) with LT, 27 of 63 (43%) with D-TB and 10 of 18 (56%) with APP. CONCLUSIONS: Second-line HPLC testing reduced uninterpretable samples by 47%, with similar rates of improvement regardless of the type of CDT pattern. The usefulness of HPLC as a second-line test for CDT should be evaluated according to cost-benefit considerations in the context of each laboratory.

Use of carboxyhemoglobin as a biomarker of environmental CO exposure: critical evaluation of the literature.

Carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning is the primary cause for access to emergency department (ED) services for more than 50,000 persons in Europe and the USA every year. CO poisoning diagnosis is based on multiple factors and is usually confirmed by high carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) levels in the blood. We conducted a systematic evaluation of literature to investigate the usefulness of COHb as a biomarker of environmental CO exposure. We conducted an electronic search in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases. We selected studies reporting high or low environmental CO concentrations, as well as COHb levels in exposed subjects presenting in ED or staying at home. We included 19 studies, but only 7 studies reported environmental CO concentration and proved a correlation between COHb and CO exposure in healthy and non-smoker subjects only. However, confounding factors were often incompletely assessed. The main symptoms reported were headache, nausea, vertigo and vomiting. COHb data stored in healthcare databases were used in six studies and provided useful information about symptoms, CO sources and patient characteristics. Most studies were classified at risk of bias. This review indicates that COHb is the most commonly used biomarker to assess CO exposure and seems to be useful. Further studies are needed to establish the reliability of COHb as a biomarker and/or explore other possible biomarkers. Surveillance systems of the general population, correlated with geographical locations and other confounding factors, could be important for CO exposure monitoring and the development of focused prevention programs.

Carbohydrate-Deficient Transferrin Determination in a Clinical Setting: Consistency Between Capillary Electrophoresis Assays and Utility of HPLC as a Confirmatory Test.

BACKGROUND: Carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) is used to assess chronic alcohol consumption in administrative and forensic context. The aim of the present study was the optimization of the diagnostic strategy for CDT determination in a clinical laboratory setting. METHODS: Two capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) assays, the CEofix CDT (Analis, Suarlée, Belgium) run on single capillary MDQ instrument and the muticapillary (Sebia, Lisses, France), were compared as screening methods and a commercial high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay (Recipe, Munich, Germany) was used for confirmation. RESULTS: In total, 367 serum samples were analyzed by both CZE assays with concordant classification in 92% of cases. All discordant samples were classified as negative by HPLC, as did 2/3 of those that could not be classified by either CZE assay. Classification of samples with CDT values close to cut-off by CZE was confirmed by HPLC in 95-100% of negative samples but only in 28.6-33.3% of positive samples. CONCLUSIONS: Both CZE assays proved suitable for CDT screening. HPLC was useful for discriminating CDT value in most of samples that could not be interpreted by CZE due to analytical interferences. Considering the implication of CDT testing, HPLC assay may also be helpful for the confirmation of positive results close to the cut-off value of CZE assays.